[sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 27: Jan 7 - 13, 2011

2010-11-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Hello, Sage Days are being organised at Orsay on 17-18 January 2011. I saw announcements for Sage Days 26 and 27: days26 (December 7-11, 2010, Seattle) days27 (Jan 7-13 2011, almost certainly in Seattle) Can we book number 28? Should Sage Days 27 be added to the upcoming workshops on http

[sage-devel] Sage days 28, Orsay, France, 17-19 January 2011

2010-12-12 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Chers collègues, Vous avez probablement entendu parler de Sage, un logiciel libre de mathématiques qui combine la puissance de nombreux programmes libres dans une interface commune, et qui s'est donné pour mission de créer une alternative viable, libre et open source, à Magma, Maple, Mathematica e

[sage-devel] Sage days 28, Orsay, France, 17-19 Jan 2011

2011-01-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Chers collègues, Vous avez probablement entendu parler de Sage, un logiciel libre de mathématiques qui combine la puissance de nombreux programmes libres dans une interface commune, et qui s'est donné pour mission de créer une alternative viable, libre et open source, à Magma, Maple, Mathematica e

[sage-devel] Re: Fernando Perez's talk today at Sage Days 29

2011-03-26 Thread Samuel Lelievre
On Mar 25, 6:16 am, William Stein wrote: > Today Fernando Perez gave a very inspiring and enthusiastic > talk today at Sage Days 29 on Scientific Computing using Python, > including a historical introduction with a story about how he accidentally > unplugged the internet for the entire country of C

[sage-devel] Re: new group sage-trac-account for managing trac accounts

2011-04-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
On 16 avr, 16:20, Jason Grout wrote: > On 4/16/11 8:40 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > > Quite honestly, when have a bug to report, if I can't finish the > > transaction right away then it's unlikely I'll go through the hoops > > and report the bug later (unless the bug is really important). This

[sage-devel] build timing

2011-04-17 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Hello, Is it possible to get a timing indication at the end of "make", similar to the one at the end of "make ptestlong", which looks something like Total time for all tests: 31931.8 seconds What about a translation into days hours minutes seconds, like Total time for all tests: 31931.8 sec

[sage-devel] Re: SVD fails on certain Macs

2011-04-26 Thread Samuel Lelievre
On Apr 26, 6:14 am, Francois Bissey: > Actually do we know what version of > ATLAS/BLAS/LAPACK is shipped with OSX? Here are a few excerpts from the sage install log file /Applications/sage-4.7.alpha5/install.log on my mac. ATLAS=atlas-3.8.3.p16 LAPACK=lapack-20071123.p2 BLAS=blas-20070724 (ti

[sage-devel] Re: SVD fails on certain Macs

2011-04-28 Thread Samuel Lelievre
On Apr 26, 6:14 am, Francois Bissey wrote: > Actually do we know what version of > ATLAS/BLAS/LAPACK is shipped with OSX? I couldn't figure out how to check that... All I found are a few posts on macresearch.org, which I didn't find helpful four our problem, http://www.macresearch.org/tutorial-u

[sage-devel] Re: upcoming Sage Days

2014-01-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sage Days 57 are now April 5-12, 2014 and have a webpage at http://wiki.sagemath.org/days57 Samuel Lelièvre William Stein wrote: > > Here are some upcoming Sage Days workshops, which I just added numbers > for. The dates of some are tentative. If *you're* interested in > going to one, let m

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Stack Exchange Site

2014-09-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
And just to link with a similar discussion on ask-sage: http://ask.sagemath.org/question/24175/please-join-sage-in-stack-exchange-to-make-it-a-formal-community/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and st

[sage-devel] Re: Regina 3-manifold software

2014-09-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
kcrisman: > > I think we have a SnapPy (or whatever it is called now) interface, but do > we have one for this? (Well, no. But *should* we?) > > http://regina.sourceforge.net/ > > It uses Python for scripting... and has been around for quite a while. > Just curious. Feel free to open a ticket

[sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Hi all, I am using OS X 10.10 Yosemite. I was beta-testing it since July, and failing to build Sage. (Strangely I never thought about using the OSX-10.9 version. I just tried and it works! Thanks Stefan for asking the question, and Volker for answering it works!) About building Sage on Yosemite

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Yosemite

2014-10-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
William Stein wrote: > This pattern has happened with literally every single OS X release: So true! Searching sage lists for '_scproxy' reveals that the failure to build the _scproxy module happened before on new releases of OS X. See the search results for sage-release [0] and sage-devel [1], wi

[sage-devel] Re: NumberField comparison?!?

2014-10-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
There is a workaround which is to use (a-b).is_real_positive() The comparison should be fixed to use that. Samuel Le mercredi 22 octobre 2014 19:13:15 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > The number field comparison returns ">" for any two non-equal numbers. > Surely there is a good reason fo

[sage-devel] Re: OT: Sage notebook as a interface for python

2014-10-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
[cc-ing to sage-support, please answer on sage-support rather than sage-devel] You can also use one of the following tricks. - you can make a cell python by typing %python in the first line of the cell. - towards the top of every notebook worksheet, there are four drop-dow

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

2014-10-24 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Volker Braun wrote: > > I think the mirroring is currently broken either due to the website > relayout or the boxen move. > Things seem to be back in order now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poset/lattice, join and join_matrix

2014-10-27 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Yo ! > > > This is good argument to support (only) []-style argument for several > > elements. Be consistent within same program. Or in Sage terms, "Build a > car, > > don't let it look like bicycle combined to tractor." :=) > > > > Btw, why gcd([]) returns zero? At l

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on OSX 10.10

2014-10-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Hi, Under OS X 10.10 Yosemite, with then without homebrew's gcc 4.9.1, I tried and failed to build Sage. 1. With homebrew's gcc 4.9.1 installed. Starting from Sage 6.4.beta6 I merged #17176 u/vbraun/gdb_on_yosemite #17169 u/vbraun/upgrade_to_gcc_4_9_1 #17204 u/vbraun/osx_yosemite_libtool_ve

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on OSX 10.10

2014-10-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sorry, the last 6 lines in my last post are there twice, please ignore the repetition. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poset/lattice, join and join_matrix

2014-10-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
By coincidence I just found that the function GCD_list in sage.rings.integer was coded to return one for an empty list. Fix (needs review!) at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17257 Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To u

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on OSX 10.10

2014-10-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
hing with homebrew installed there. > > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:57:19 AM UTC, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> Under OS X 10.10 Yosemite, with then without homebrew's gcc 4.9.1, >> I tried and failed to build Sage. >> >> -- You received this message beca

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

2014-11-02 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2014-11-02 08:35:25 UTC, tdumont: > > Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq > > packages are new and need to be compiled. > > > > > > On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: [GitHub] Subscribed to sagemath/docker notifications

2014-11-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Could this be in a readme.md in the project's repo at github? 2014-11-03 09:22:16 Z, Volker Braun: > > Minimal instructions (assuming you have docker installled): > > docker run -t -i sagemath/sage > > automatically downloads the Sage container and starts a Sage command line. > If you start the c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The Misfortunes of a Trio of Mathematicians Using Computer Algebra Systems

2014-11-13 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2014-11-12 21:18:56 UTC+1, Ursula Whitcher wrote: All I can see from trac is that everything happened 22 months ago. How > do I find how long it took to go from positive review to stable release? > Once logged into sage's trac, follow the top-right link to "Preferences" then go to the "Date an

Re: [sage-devel] vote: include pip with sage

2014-11-17 Thread Samuel Lelievre
vdelecroix wrote: > The pip ticket (#16479) is now positively reviewed. Should I open a > new one to make it standard? > Yes! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s

[sage-devel] Re: How to include a module depending on an optional package into the reference manual?

2014-11-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Volker Braun wrote: > > How about making arb a standard package, we should probably think about > that sooner or later anyways. > +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: code of conduct - ends Monday at midnight, PST.

2014-11-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
[x ] No -- do not adopt the code of conduct stated below -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Sage.app binary problems

2014-12-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2014-12-01 17:20:19 UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > I, just downloaded the Sage.app (OSX 10.9) from 2 different server and the >> resulting downloads didn't give the Sage.app, but simply the src >> Maybe theres a problems? >> > > It's conceivable that the mirrors were still updating, though in

[sage-devel] Re: coeffs() & coefficients()

2014-12-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2014-12-03 10:27:53 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Sorry, a bit late. I also agree with removing *coeffs* and referring to > *list *in the documentation of *coefficients*. > > What's more, the issue comes up with symbolic expressions too, where > *coeffs *is an alias of* coefficients*, and ther

[sage-devel] Re: sage server and test_notebook

2016-08-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
cc-ing sage-notebook 2016-08-14 17:01:04 UTC+2, Mike Zabrocki: > > Hi, > > I was trying to get a sage server running on a computer at work and I kept > finding that it would not connect. I then started debugging and ran into > further issues. > > When I execute the documentation > > http://do

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Multiple versions of SageMath's documentation online

2016-08-22 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le lundi 22 août 2016 16:53:56 UTC+2, Nicolas M. Thiery a écrit : > >Dear Samuel, Frédéric, Harald, > > Sorry for the slow answer; I am just back from vacations. > > Thanks Sam, Frédéric for the pings! > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:46:08PM +0200, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > >This po

[sage-devel] Re: How to use Sage's doc builder off the source tree

2016-08-27 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le samedi 27 août 2016 14:40:26 UTC+2, Simon King a écrit : > > Hi! > > It has been a long time since I was considering Sage's doc builder. So, > please allow me to ask, since it is conceivable that I missed recent > developments: > > - Assume you have bunch of cython and python files sitting

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

2016-09-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-09-06 11:08:25 UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd): > PS, I found this page > https://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/DebianSage > last updated in 2009. Unless someone is willing to update it, I suggest it > might be better removed. > Thanks for this suggestion. I updated the page.

[sage-devel] Re: bernoulli(250408) incorrect

2016-09-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-09-06 17:37:20 UTC+2, Alexander Weisse: > > > Dear Sage developers, > > the current version 2.5.2 of the flint library doesn't use enough > floating point precision in _arith_bernoulli_number_zeta(). This causes > bernoulli(250408) to be incorrect. > > Since Sage uses flint as the defaul

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

2016-09-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-09-06 18:02:33 UTC+2, leif: > > Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > 2016-09-06 11:08:25 UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd): > > > > > > PS, I found this page > > https://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/DebianSage > >

Re: [sage-devel] ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

2016-09-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-09-06 17:39:38 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer: > > General comment to all people complaining about Sphinx: reviewing > existing Sphinx-related tickets such as #20577 will show that you > actually care and will encourage other Sage developers to continue > working on Sphinx. > For instance https:

[sage-devel] Re: 404 in Sage Installation Guide

2016-09-09 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Fri 2016-09-09 00:16:36 UTC+2, leif: > > The link to README.txt ("Be sure to read the file ..." [!]) > > http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/win/README.txt > > referenced in > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/binary.html#microsoft-windows > > gives a 404, for whatever reason.

[sage-devel] Re: State of Sage Wiki and Support

2016-09-09 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thu 2016-09-01 01:45:19 UTC+2, saad khalid wrote on sage-support: > Hey everyone: Hey! Thanks for raising these points. I thought this discussion could get more contributions on sage-devel, so I moved it here. All please reply only on sage-devel to keep the discussion in one place. > It's seeme

[sage-devel] Re: memory management issue: deleted variables not released

2016-09-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sat 2016-09-10 08:56:04 UTC+2, Denis on sage-devel: > As far as I am concerned, development of Sage stopped at 7.0 - I tried > 7.3 yesterday, and could not do a mid-level benchmark calculation, which > I have been repeating since at least 6.4. The problem is a memory fault. > 7.0 is the last versi

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-10-20 00:24:17 UTC+2, Paul Masson: > doc.sagemath.org is now showing up in Google searches, > including the link that initiated this thread. Hoorray! This is great news for all SageMath users. Thanks Paul and Harald for your efforts to make it happen. And thanks to anyone else involved (eg

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jsmol.js

2016-11-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Note that Jmol and Jsmol were also discussed recently on debian-science-sagemath: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-sagemath/Week-of-Mon-20161010/000258.html http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-sagemath/Week-of-Mon-20161017/000306.html http://lists.alioth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: R 3.3.1 depends on a SSL/TLS implementation

2016-11-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Fri 2016-10-28 17:03:26 UTC+2, William: >- Python stats have come a *LONG* way in the last 10 years, with > libraries like Pandas. Why use rpy2 when you can much more > effectively use pandas and statsmodels and so on. > > In my opinion, it would be way, way better to completely remov

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with figures in doc.sagemath.org

2016-11-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Wed 2016-11-02 13:43:27 UTC+1, Harald Schilly: > > Thanks for reporting that, I'll check what's going on. > It's probably some issue with symlinks ... > Thanks Harald for looking into it, it would be nice to have the pictures showing up in the documentation. NB. These pictures were added in Sag

Re: [sage-devel] OpenSSL as a new systemwide Sage dependency ?

2016-11-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Emmanuel Charpentier: > Dima Pasechnik: > > > I was referring to the fact that > > https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg > > does not work on OSX 10.12, due to this SSL blues. > > > > Unless I misunderstand, we currently aren't able > > to build distributable Sage binaries on OSX 10.12. > > OK. T

[sage-devel] Re: Sage for Windows installer (take 2)

2016-12-07 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Wed 2016-12-07 16:39:25 UTC+1, Erik Bray: > TL;DR: if you have a 64-bit Windows (Windows 7 and up should work) > please demo and give me your thoughts on the new build of Sage for > Windows using the installer at [1]. > > Thanks, > Erik > > [1] > https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/rel

[sage-devel] Re: Python3-compatible syntax

2016-12-11 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sun 2016-12-11 09:14:01 UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo: > Latest beta is now almost Python3-compatible at syntax level, that is > > find src/sage -name '*.py' | xargs -n 1 python3 -m py_compile > > outputs almost nothing. However, there is now a lambda-line in > src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py th

[sage-devel] Re: search in sage docs says "[Object object]"

2016-12-14 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-12-14 00:09:50 UTC+1, William: > search in Sage docs says "[object Object]" Not sure what is causing that. Regarding "algebraic_dependency", search for "algdep". https://www.google.fr/search?q=algdep+sagemath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-devel] Re: Our current git doesn't build anymore with recent (>=1.1) openSSL

2016-12-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Emmanuel Charpentier: the solution was an SOT to the relevant R package author, > For the acronym-unexperts here, could you spell out SOT in full? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin

Re: [sage-devel] Python's _ssl module wont't compile correctly against OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Upgrade to Python 2.7.12 is done at #19735. Upgrade to Python 2.7.13 is in progress at #22037. #19735 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19735 #22037 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22037 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubsc

[sage-devel] Re: R fails to compile

2017-01-18 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Tue 2017-01-17 02:24:54 UTC, Rob Gross: > I tried to upgrade to 7.5.1 on several different Macs which I thought had identical software. > > However, on one of them, R failed to compile, with the error: > > installing 'sysdata.rda' > dyld: Symbol not found: __libiconv_version > Referenced fr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage for Windows installer

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Hi all, when I advertise the SageMath installer for Windows, I tell people to use the .exe installer from the top item at https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/releases/ These instructions stay valid, pointing to the latest version, even when a new version is released. Best, Samuel Le lun

[sage-devel] Re: Problem building GSL in cygwin64

2017-01-24 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Apparently there are two posts with the same subject, one on sage-support and one on sage-devel. The two messages you mention are on sage-support at https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-support/m6tGTnuirqY/discussion Le mardi 24 janvier 2017 09:29:51 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > I tried t

[sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

2017-02-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sun 2017-02-05 13:27:02 UTC+1, Isuru Fernando: > I've packaged sage 7.5.1 for conda for linux and have uploaded it to anaconda.org. > > To try it out you can do on linux with miniconda3, (Downloads about 1 GB) > > conda create -n sage sage sage-spkg-sources -c isuruf -c conda-forge > > This w

Re: [sage-devel] For the record : the lil' Win10 notebook that (almost) could (barely).

2017-03-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thu 2017-02-16 16:33:56 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier: > Dear Erik, > > Le jeudi 16 février 2017 11:09:00 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : > >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >> >> > This is a followup on the threads dedicated to the alternatives existing to >> > use Sage

Re: [sage-devel] A strange bug I cant't reproduce in any simpler way (LaurentPolynomialRing)

2017-03-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Daniel Krenn [2017-02-20 20:47:03]: >On 2017-02-20 19:24, VulK wrote: >> Dear All, >> I just found a bug I can't really reproduce in any simpler way than the >> one I have here. I did not open a ticket yet on this because I would >> like to have a simpler way to explain the issue first. Any i

[sage-devel] Re: How do I handle a bug I do not have time to fix?

2017-03-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2017-02-27 10:02:50 UTC-6, Salvatore Stella: > Dear all, > some time ago I reported a bug in the implementation of `ClusterQuiver` > which yields wrong answers. The relevant ticket is #22381. To give you > an idea things like this happen: > > {{{ > sage: B = Matrix([[0,1,0],[-1,0,1],

[sage-devel] Re: OpenSSL relicensed! (Licensing Update - OpenSSL Blog )

2017-03-26 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Fri 2017-03-24 05:44:58 UTC+1, William: > Licensing Update - OpenSSL Blog > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/20/license/ > Apparently this has now moved to: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/22/license/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: [sage-devel] When install SAGE, it says: 'gmp.h' and 'libgmp' have different versions

2017-04-07 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Is there a specific reason why you were trying to install Sage 5.7? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To pos

Re: [sage-devel] Re: help needed to debug a systematically killed Sage

2017-04-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Sat 2017-04-08 15:14:57 UTC+2, vdelecroix: > > On 07/04/2017 23:52, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 12:35:13 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > >> > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I have trouble building Sage for the patchbot. My procedure consists > >> just in launching

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

2017-04-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Not sure if this is related, but one thing that goes wrong with the upgrade to IPython 5.0 is that multiline output gets an extraneous blank line, for example instead of sage: identity_matrix(2) [1 0] [0 1] we get sage: identity_matrix(2) [1 0] [0 1] This is solved in I

[sage-devel] Re: different output of latex of crystal graph on Sage 7.6 and Cloud

2017-05-01 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Tue 2017-05-02 06:15:50 UTC+2, Jianping Pan: > So my understanding that Sage 7.6 is not the one > that is running on sagemath cloud. And I don't know > how I can fix it. Would getting the beta version > solve this problem? Or do I need to install/update > anything on my computer? The default Sage

Re: [sage-devel] First Joint GAP-​Sage Days (St Andrews, January 2016)

2015-10-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2015-10-12 22:45:08 UTC+2, Snark: > > Le lundi 12 oct. 2015 à 13:02:38 (-0700), Volker Braun a écrit : > > On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:46:29 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: > > > > > > Does that mean that the libgap in sagemath will get part of upstream > GAP? > > > > > > > A better interop bet

[sage-devel] Re: package csdp: experimental -> optional

2015-10-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
For those who don't know about CSDP (like me 5 min ago), CSDP is a "C Library for Semidefinite Programming". Homepage: https://projects.coin-or.org/Csdp/ Added as an experimental package for Sage two years ago, see SageMath trac ticket #14505: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14505 Used b

Re: [sage-devel] source code comments: doctesting instructions

2015-11-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
We could also have something like # test yearly and just make sure to test those at least yearly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 6.9 Ubuntu PPA: Error typesetting mathematics

2015-11-07 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thanks! the suggested steps fixed the MathJax problem for the PPA install at our department. Other computer rooms at our university (outside our department, and with a different maintainer) also have SageMath 6.6 installed. Would you recommend to first uninstall 6.6 there, and then install 6.9, to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

2015-11-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Please everyone write Jupyter with "y" when talking about Project Jupyter and the Jupyter Notebook. Read "Where does the name come from" at: https://github.com/jupyter/design/wiki/Jupyter-Logo#where-does-the-name-come-from : ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800 (PST), Volker Braun: > Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new > binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched > automatically on first run, no more relocation after that. Thank you for that. On a MacBook Air running OS X 10.10.5, I downloaded

[sage-devel] Re: sage called from texmacs will not start

2015-12-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Alkis Akritas wrote: > My apologies for the very late response; I was expecting > to get notified by e-mail of any answers. > There are two ways to obtain such notification. - In your Google Groups settings for sage-devel, you can ask to get email updates for all threads you post in. - Or t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-7.0 ?

2015-12-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2015-12-19 10:23:58 -0800 (PST), kcrisman: > [Volker Braun wrote:] >> The switch [to Jupyter notebook as a default in SageMath] >> is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19740 (needs review) > > uh, that is a pretty big change. Is there any obvious/easy way > for people to migrate sws notebooks t

Re: [sage-devel] Sage & pip

2016-01-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-01-05 13:25:40 +, John Cremona: So I reinstalled openssl-dev using the package manager, then did what > you suggest above (without the ssl), and am now rebuilding all the > things which depend on python2. > > I would prefer it if the build process would not proceed without > openssl

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath developer manual

2016-01-18 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 10:18:54 UTC, Harald Schilly a écrit : > > the hosting is on github, and if a subdirectory matches a project, > it's a "sub-page" > > So, the second link is pointing here: > https://github.com/sagemath/git-developer-guide > > I don't know anything about this repositor

[sage-devel] Re: Sage GSOC 2016

2016-01-18 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon, 2016-01-18 06:07:04 -0800 (PST), kcrisman: See last year's Sage GSOC wiki page >> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2016 >> >> > For the record (especially newbies), that's > http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2015 > > >> for inspiration and formatting (copy-paste and adapt from there).

Re: [sage-devel] https on the wiki

2016-01-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
+1 to letsencrypt, which was already discussed in this sage-devel discussion https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/l9zS4IPioPE/discussion related link https://vincent.composieux.fr/article/install-configure-and-automatically-renew-let-s-encrypt-ssl-certificate Who can give mmarco the appro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Torrent file downloads from http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/torrents.html fails with HTTP error 404

2016-01-22 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Thanks Karl-Philip Richter for reporting these broken links. Harald, could we set up a redirection from http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/* to http://files.sagemath.org/* Note that we already have a redirection from http://www.sagemath.org/src-old/ to http://old.files.sagemath.org/sr

[sage-devel] Re: Matrix unicode output

2016-01-25 Thread Samuel Lelievre
When starting the Sage REPL, we currently display the following advice: Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. Type "help()" for help. We could add a few more hints that answer frequently asked questions: Type "%display unicode_art" for a nicer display of some ou

[sage-devel] Re: Getting Started

2016-01-26 Thread Samuel Lelievre
I second that. In addition, the "Ticket reports" page at http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/TicketReports has a link to "beginner" tickets which are good tickets to get started with our development process. The content of these tickets is easy (sometimes just a typo), so you focus on the developme

Re: [sage-devel] Hacker news thread about math software ("Announcing Wolfram Programming Lab")

2016-01-29 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2016 20:15:59 UTC+1, bluescarni a écrit : > > Ah thanks for the pointer, it took some google fu > to get finally to his website. In case anyone is interested: > > http://www.cas-testing.org/ > ... from where one gets more: http://www.cas-testing.org/ http://www.cas-testing.o

Re: [sage-devel] Trac detected an internal error: OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: ...

2016-02-02 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le vendredi 29 janvier 2016 08:29:05 UTC+1, Justin C. Walker a écrit : > > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 22:35, Samuel Lelièvre > wrote: > > > > Trying to connect to > > > >http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11517 > > > > I get this error > > > >Trac detected an internal error: > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: How to develop SAGE CRM?

2016-02-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-02-03 10:54:56 Z, Amol Ghadage: > How to develop SAGE CRM? > > means Which programming language used to develop SAGE CRM? > Which IDE used to develop SAGE CRM? > Please give solution in steps. > Thank you in advance. > This list is about the development of SageMath, the Sage Mathemat

[sage-devel] Re: Sage developers days on packaging, portability, documentation tools

2016-02-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
The upcoming Sage developer days at Cernay on packaging, portability, documentation tools are now numbered "Sage Days 77". https://wiki.sagemath.org/days77 The dates should be decided by next week-end, it's still time to indicate your preferred dates at https://framadate.org/HSPRcUBuWDFn

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cannot post comments on trac #19984

2016-02-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-02-04 03:53:43 UTC, William: > > So far only you and Thierry have stepped up. If you send Thierry > (sa...@lma.metelu.net ) your public key, he can make an > account for you > on wiki.sagemath.org and trac.sagemath.org. > I'm interested in joining too. I'll send Thierry my public key.

Re: [sage-devel] Getting reminders for tickets in needs_work

2016-02-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-02-05 10:13:28 Z, Jori Mäntysalo: > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > 1. The e-mail goes only to the author(s) of the ticket, not to all > people > > cc'ed in that ticket. > > To all cc'ed people would not be too much, assuming we could have real > un-cc -possibility. Bu

[sage-devel] Re: will Sage apply for GSoC 2016?

2016-02-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
The Google-summer-of-code page on the SageMath wiki is https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC and the first link there is to the 2016 page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

[sage-devel] Re: RedHat/opensource.com -- article about Sage

2016-03-09 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mardi 8 mars 2016 18:46:29 UTC+1, William a écrit : > > Hi Sage Devs, > > See > > https://opensource.com/education/16/3/sagemath > > and > > http://lwn.net/ > > Don't expect anything interesting to *you* -- it's just basically the > transcript of that video my brother made, which has no

[sage-devel] Re: log(8) == 3*log(2)

2016-03-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le jeudi 10 mars 2016 03:41:08 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit : > > Hello, > > In the current beta I have > > sage: bool(log(8) == 3*log(2)) > False > > Why Sage is not able to check this simple relation directly? Hopefully, > > sage: bool((log(8) == 3*log(2)).simplify_log()) > True > > But not

[sage-devel] memory leak with SR equality test

2016-03-31 Thread Samuel Lelievre
See the report at http://ask.sagemath.org/question/32920/memory-saturation-when-i-test-equalities-in-symbolic-ring/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email t

[sage-devel] Re: Request to extend the binomial function by the reflection formula

2016-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error while building Sage 7.1

2016-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-04-04 00:25:22 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:47:37 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 9:30:41 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> On the contrary, I believe requiring someone to build an entirely >>> separate compiler toolchain

[sage-devel] Re: On development workflows for sharing (experimental) code

2016-05-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-05-03 09:59:05 UTC-5, Nicolas M. Thiéry: > Tangentially to the recent discussion about modularity of the Sage > library and support for packages on top of Sage, I have started > writing some notes about the different workflows that have been used > to develop and share code, either "on

[sage-devel] Should we close all tickets with milestone "sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix"?

2016-05-19 Thread Samuel Lelievre
I'm wondering if we should close all trac tickets whose milestone has been set to "sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix"? Review them first? Some already have "positive review". http://trac.sagemath.org/milestone/sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=positive_review&statu

[sage-devel] Re: using infinite recursion productively

2016-05-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-05-19 16:49:24 UTC+2, Nils Bruin: > > You can use infinite recursion productively in python. It even evaluates > pretty quickly: > > We've used it in the sage library in at least two places (although > one was rewritten a while ago to use a different mechanism). > Could you tell which two

Re: [sage-devel] print to python3

2016-05-28 Thread Samuel Lelievre
I am in favour of any of the suggested approaches which would let users transition at their own pace. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+un

Re: [sage-devel] Users can permanently modify GF(5).list()

2016-06-02 Thread Samuel Lelievre
See also http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10927 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: PEP idea: unary division

2016-06-02 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-06-02 14:01:16 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer: > > Summary: Python should have a unary division operator (a.k.a. > reciprocal), written "/x", analogous to unary subtraction (a.k.a. > negation), written "-x". And then "~x" should be what is intended by > Python, namely bitwise negation. > > Rationa

[sage-devel] Re: PEP idea: unary division

2016-06-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le jeudi 2 juin 2016 22:33:45 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > I'm guessing that this won't fly with upstream ;-) > > Is it really faster? A new __unary_div__ method everywhere? Is it really > faster than special-casing the 1/x case in __div__? > By analogy to __neg__ the new unary method migh

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Please someone switch the DNS to point to the resurrected sage wiki. (cc-ing Harald in case he can do it). Thanks Thierry! Samuel Le lundi 6 juin 2016 19:08:44 UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) a écrit : > > Hi, > > the wiki is back online at University Paris North : > http://sagewiki.lip

Re: [sage-devel] Re: http://trac.sagemath.org vs https://trac.sagemath.org

2016-06-08 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mercredi 8 juin 2016 12:53:38 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:34 AM, mmarco > > wrote: > > I volunteered some time ago to set up a letsencrypt certificate in the > wiki. > > I didn't include trac server in that move because there was already the > > option for http

[sage-devel] Fwd: [gdr-im] Announcing Sollya 5.0

2016-06-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Forwarding this announcement of the release of Sollya 5.0. See in particular the last point: * Additional functions in the Sollya library intended to further open Sollya to dynamical extension with bindings such as for Python and Sage. -- Forwarded message -- From: Chr

[sage-devel] Re: more tests in sage (not doctests)

2016-06-22 Thread Samuel Lelievre
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit

[sage-devel] Re: Git repository should have Sage versions as branches not tags

2016-07-18 Thread Samuel Lelievre
There is a bot (called sageb0t) that turns pull requests on GitHub into trac tickets. It might be that the bot also closes pull requests when the corresponding tickets have been closed on trac and a new public release of Sage happens (github pull requests are typically against the master branch

  1   2   3   4   5   >