AFAIK, the normalizer of a group is not yet implemented.
If you type
sage: s6.normalizer?
you'll see the synax for that command. My guess is that normalizer_of_group
would be an easy function to implement (and I can do that if no one
else wants to).
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Hy Ginsberg <[
A point of clarification: AFAIK, no newlines were used originally in the
tutorial or construction docs. They were introduced only to increase
the readability
of the pdf versions. Even as it is, in the 2008.01.18 version of the tutorial
sold on lulu, there are 10 pages or so which have lines cut of
wanted to do so for a while, but too many other projects
intervened. I'll try to chip in a bit.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
sage: from sage.groups.abelian_group.lattice import Lattice
or
sage: from sage.cominat.lattice import Lattice
depending on which Lattice you wanted to work with.
I think the debate going on in this thread is more about which is the
default one in the global namespace. I hate the global names
I'll add my 2 cents, since I just read a post by William where he suggested he
might remove the command kernel, leaving left_kernel and right_kernel (and
I hope, adding kernel_left and kernel_right for tab completion).
I'm not strongly in favor of Lattice (alone) for either the poset or the
finit
matter, but the problem isn't quite as extensive as might be feared.
:-)
David
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:00 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Sage just uses the mainstream language Python; we are
> >not in the language design business. It's an interesting
>
I'm going. Robert Miller and I are doing a poster on SAGE and coding theory.
I'll submit it tomorrow or Monday.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Emil Volcheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, William,
> >
> >
This looks really awesome Dan. It's really great you are working on this.
Is there any functionality planned for products of GL(1)'s (for example)?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have implemented some tools for working with characters of Lie
> gr
Yes, that's the direction I was going but was also wondering about
characters of tori.
Also, has induction/restriction been implemented?
On 4/26/08, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > This looks really awesome Dan. It's really great you are working on this.
> > Is there any functiona
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SEP
>
> Implement Lattices over ZZ, with pairings into QQ or ZZ
>
> 0. (Maybe) Implement a FreeModule_ZZ_quotient class. This would also
> allow for constructing abelian groups in the sort of canonical way
> (someth
elianGroup instances are not
completely implemented. If the plan is to fix AbelianGroup first, then
I vote +1.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:29 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, I don't think you understood my suggestion. We are talking
> about groups A which
I am in fact planning on reimplementing finitely generated abelian
groups soon, so my vote would be to have the quotient of lattices L/L'
(with L' a full sublattice or not) be an abelian group A with a
canonical map L -> A.
David
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:33 PM, William Stein <
ses
for quadratic forms.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou
I like it but perhaps I am prejudiced:-) IMHO, SAGE would be dead (or at least
a very lonely research project) if it weren't for the fact that it is
free and open source.
But also, design is an important factor.
Some ideas (I hesitate to call them suggestions since it seems fine as is):
1. replac
...
>
> I think my project makes a good use of Sage:
> - Output of Gap is used as input for the C-programs written by David
> Green.
> - Output of the C-programs is input for methods of Cython classes
> (these classes are resolutions, cochains, chain maps etc). The classes
> al
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if that is of any interest but someone around here might care
> about the fact that Sage was probably the most mentioned (and cited)
> mathematics software at the "First Conference for Symboli
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:35 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> I don't know if that is of any interest but someone around here might
> care
> >> about the fact that Sage was probably the most mentioned (and cited)
> >> mathematics software at the "First Conference for Symbo
nd
hence is more useful LATER). I can't see any way around this
tradeoff. The only thing I can see that will stop a project like Sage
from dying is to keep building a steady inflow of users and
contributors, so that the knowledge you refer to remains as alive as
possible.
david
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:38 PM, root wrote:
>
> David,
>
>>> But we've already had this discussion and it is clear that I'm
>>> completely out-in-the-weeds, talking-nonsense, and obviously have
>>> no idea how REAL-open-source-projects are done. So l
t;do it all over again"
> without some fundamental gain. I may be wrong that the literate
> documentation is the key. And I admit I'm a knuth-boy fanatic about
> it.
> My question is, what can you suggest that will make it live when
> others
7;s a bit weird.
I hate to think what happens if we implement, e.g. the ring of
continuous functions on the interval [0, 1]. I suppose then "gens"
needs to return some kind of uncountable generator object perhaps
(excuse the pun)?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
hat the probabilities are such that it
> is vastly more likely that there is something wrong with your input to
> Mathematica or your understanding of what is happening than with the
> internal code of the Mathematica system itself.''
Arrrgggh, I ju
Very good!
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:51 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a new version of my ISSAC talk abstract. What do you think:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract.pdf
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> U
; #3066: Didier Deshommes: empty matrices: gram_schmidt() throws
>a NameError
> #3067: Didier Deshommes: matrices: numeric_array() is missing
>an import
>
> Merged in alpha0:
>
> #783: Alex Ghitza: dilog is lame
> #1187: Alex Ghitza: bug in G.conjugacy_
Looks good to me. I think Python is actually in the top 5 languages
now, isn't it?
Maybe Perl is 5 and Python is 6?
In any case, my only suggestion is to emphasize the point that *you*
needed an alternative
to the M's by pointing out somehow that (a) the others are propritary
and therefore not
su
are not that badly off as is.
But what about the asymptotics? I tried 10^5 and 2*10^5 and 4*10^5
and it wasn't pretty.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
7;ll see in a week ..
I hope you did:
sage: x = bernoulli(10^7 + 2)
and not
sage: bernoulli(10^7 + 2)
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rnoulli(6)
Wall time: 3.79
sage: time x = bernoulli(12)
Wall time: 16.97
sage: time x = bernoulli(24)
Wall time: 118.24
sage: time x = bernoulli(48)
Wall time: 540.25
and I'll report back with 960000 hopefully within an hour.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---
me(50)
sage: bernoulli_mod_p_single(p, 24)
498812
sage: x % p
498812
sage: p = next_prime(10^6)
sage: bernoulli_mod_p_single(p, 24)
841174
sage: x % p
841174
So I would say the answer is correct.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send em
umptions, it should take 5.1 days. I've attached the
> plots that show the curves I fit to some runtime data (x-axis is log
> (n,1.5) y-axis is seconds).
Sorry, could you please say more precisely what the two axes are? I'm
seeing negative time the way I inte
ic. Does anyone know what the
theoretical complexity is supposed to be?
Anyway, extrapolating gives about 4.5 days, pretty much the same as
what Tom estimates. I'm going to start it running now.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
I think this is interesting too but was unable to compile it nor get
the binary to work.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Very interestingly, somebody posted
Possibly strange results on an ubuntu 7.10amd64 machine. (It is a
rather old machine
though, so many this is not something to worry about.)
export SAGE_PBUILD=yes
export SAGE_BUILD_THREADS=2
make
Build went fine. However, sage -testall started messing up almost immediately.
Here is some of it:
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 3, 6:33 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> > Possibly strange results on an ubuntu 7.10amd64 machine. (It is a
> > rather old m
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:19 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 3, 7:14 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
se_ring.
Tensor products of polynomial rings and their quotients would be the
first
natural cases to implement.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PRO
GPLv2.
- David Joyner
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs:
I'm not going to be able to work much more on coercion until next
week, and I don't get the impression that Robert has much time this
week either. It's probably best to put coercion off until after
3.0.2.
David
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:44 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
_single function that I mentioned a few days ago on
this thread.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> ourselves on the back too much.
>>
>>
>
> David Harvey's congruence tests would be pretty good. Just choose
> *any* prime p > 10^7 + 10
> say and compute B_{10^7+4} modulo it using David Harvey's function;
>
> sage: p = next_prime(10^7+10)
> sa
On May 6, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> I think a blog post with PARI timings and then timings for a modular
> dsage approach would be cool.
Probably not so cool, since it would be like 50 machines vs one machine.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
he economics just don't work out. Even 80 processors is a
pathetically small number, given a 50x serial slowdown in the
algorithm. You would need thousands of cpus to even consider this
approach. And even then, it would only be worthwhile if each cpu had
very limited memory.
david
--~--~-
the choice of the 2 or n
maps A -> C can not be decided by without specification of
the map.
> C would probably be implemented one of David Roe's wrapper
> classes, so Q tensor Z[x] would be Q[x], but would still know its
> factors.
A good design is very important.
In fact this
ay and finally these is something
> to put out. We are still mostly on bug fix only mode, so no big
> surprises. "sage -sdist" seems to have been broken by David
> Joyner's #3046, so sage-banner is emtpy [see #3161]. I fixed
> this in the tarball and it will be fixed in Sa
(sceduled for on Jan 2nd, in the
afternoon). Possibly there will be a booth as well, as there was last year.
If you are a SAGE developer, could you please reply to this list (or just
to me, if you prefer) if you are thinking of attending this meeting?
- David Joyner
Good idea! I added that to the wiki: http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you are a SAGE developer, could you please reply to this list (or just
> > to me, if you prefer) if you are thinking of attending this meeting?
n ordered field (it's actually not even a field at all!).
Anyway, I'd be happy to help think about ways to make infinity in Sage
more mathematically rigorous while keeping it useful. But this
evening I have a take home final to finish. :-)
David
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:23 PM, J
I cannot find the code browser or wiki links, both of which I use a lot.
Maybe that is because it is so slow, I give up looking. For me, each page takes
30 seconds. I guess sagemath.org is just slow this morning
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> H
ly interested,
so an introductory level talk would go down well.
Here's their Call for Papers: http://www.pyconuk.org/callforpapers.html
David Jones
http://drj11.wordpress.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroup
his faster one
very soon.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Here is some "non-fan mail" about codes in Sage from Africa. Any
> comments?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Khumbo Kum
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, your wording implies that there was one leak. Robert Miller and I sat
> down for an hour a day every day for about 2 weeks, and fixed a number of
> leaks every time. We eventually lost steam, because
eason for it to be the default base ring.
David
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -1. While I agree that defaulting to matrices over QQ rather than over
> ZZ would lead to more expected behaviour for most users, I don't see
> how the
I'm not disagreeing but want to point out one difference.
RR is an ordered field and this fact is used to differentiate between
i and -i. However, a finite field such as GF(5) is not, so there is
some ambiguity to i. It seems to me that this should be resolved somehow.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 7:0
peed.
>> Are there any benchmarks on that?
>>
>> Since GAP is standard in Sage, presumably adding toric would be pretty
>> easy, yes?
>>
>> -M. Hampton
>>
>> On Mar 29, 4:17 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
On May 17, 2008, at 8:38 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Of course one can go too crazy with optimisation.
No surely that never happens around here.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
> #3121: Jason Grout, William Stein: @interact grid control
> #3125: Robert Miller: chromatic_polynomial incorrectly blocks
> control-c
> #3126: Robert Bradshaw: Cython annotation has unicode errors
> (e.g. from the notebook)
> #3129: Bjarke Hammersholt Roune: The si
Wow!
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The author of this
>
> http://www.davidson.edu/math/chartier/Starwars/
>
> project wanted code to render a 3d model of yoda for a demonstration
> of rotation matrices.
>
> A worksheet that does this can be found a
Builds fine on an amd phenom machine running hardy heron but sage -testall
freezes at
sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/__init__.py (skipping) -- nodoctest.py
file in directory
sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
+
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:4
I agree with Nick and John.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> During the last bug day, I found several tickets related to
> inconsistencies in abelian groups. I think I've fixed the circular
> logic, etc. causing the problems in the patch in
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 23, 6:44 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All tests passed! with rc0 + the dsage fix manually applied.
>>
>> John
>
> Cool, I have released
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-
had a couple small issues left ;)
> In addition there is one pbuild issue fix that Jaap encountered
> and that in the past was also hit by David Joyner. Sources are
> at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.2/sage-3.0.2.rc3.tar
>
> Unless somethin
]
--
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 9.6 seconds
A bit odd, but I guess this is good news.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 24, 2:17 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On a
Yeah, I arrive in Seattle on June 9.
David
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 26-May-08, at 9:40 PM, David Roe wrote:
>>
>> I've gotten distracted by trying to do work that my advisor gave me.
>> I suspec
Algebraic topology.
David
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:32 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dynamical systems - I think this now might be Sage's weakest area of
> mathematics. Getting AUTO/pydstool and other more specialized code in
> Sage is necessary if its goin
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Surely the problem is (and it will get worse not better as Sage
> improves ;)) that users just may not know which constituents
> (3rd-party packages, i.e.spkgs) their Sage session has used. Are we
> asking that our us
Hi David, Nick, et al.,
I will also be arriving for SAGE Devel Days, on the 12th (with
jetlag).
I am interested on focusing on p-adic arithmetic and related
constructions.
A GaloisRing class is essentially an finite quotient of an unramified
p-adic
local ring; if a separate class is created, it
I found the tone of this email a little inappropriate but will try to reply in
a polite and I hope civil way. IMHO, it is very important to place a high value
on this email list as a space which one can find encouraging and
inspiring discussion
of the development of mathematical algorithms. Perhap
At first, sage -testall repoted a failure, in twist.py, but on
retesting it passed:
...
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
Total time for all tests: 5024.1 seconds
Please see /home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/tmp/test.log for the
complete log
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm working on rewriting the tutorial. Section 2.5.1 of the tutorial
> is about Dirichlet characters, and I have some questions:
>
> The introductory sentence discusses "Dirichlet characters", and then
> the first exa
I would like to learn a bit about Blender too. If you have a book you'd
recommend, please let me know.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a small grant this summer to work on 3D visualization of
> geometric-algebraic objects (e.g. Groebner fans)
is an object
of a concrete category", i.e. a category C with a faithful functor
f : C -> Set, such that the "elements" (as understood by Sage) of the
parent P are exactly the elements of f(P)?
> though in the context
> of coercion one usually assumes one can some kind
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Boltzmann_methods
the packages
http://www.lbmethod.org/openlb/
and
http://www.physics.ndsu.nodak.edu/people/wagner/LB.html
are GPL'd. The first is GPLv2 but SAGE is licensed GPLv2+,
and the second is licenced under the "GPL" but doesn't say which
v
On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Bill Page wrote:
> Ok (and thanks also for the clarification, David). There are of course
> two different uses of "object" here: 1) object of some category, 2)
> Python object. All Python objects have a 'type', i.e. belong to some
> Py
Everyone keeps saying they don't like the blue.
Well, I *do* like the blue!
Just my 2 cents :-)
david
On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Clement Pernet wrote:
>
> First, I really think this web site looks much better, and mature.
> Great
> job!
> I asked my roomate, Alan,
mercurial repository." can be simplified. How
about just: "It ships with all dependencies including Python and the
complete changelog in a Mercurial repository."
"read the installation guide" => "read the installation guide."
"a copy of Sage on DVD" => "a copy of Sage on DVD."
Going back up to the Linux section, for consistency, the first line
should be a link "download Linux binaries".
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
upport" => "Financial and
infrastructure support". I'm not sure if infrastructure is the right
word. Can't quite think of the right word now. Maybe "material". Not
sure.
Map:
"Sage Developers around the World" => "Sage Developers around th
s that use Sage, or tools built on top of Sage, or
something along those lines?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this
#x27;m not completely sure why. It's just one of those weird
things.
("Workings" is much much worse.)
>
> What I mean is written (digital) text that has been done for, about
> and with Sage excluding development (howto's, papers, examples, ...) -
> that ends up in a co
different
objects.
"Should be" means when someone finds the need and time to implement
such structures.
Record appears not to fit in a (mathematical) category framework, but
an equivalent functionality may be provided by some existing Python
structu
Built fine and all tests passed (hardy heon amd64, phenom processor).
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oops, pressed return by accident.
>
> This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day
> since I wanted to use it internally to test r
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So we're going to switch li
gp version?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Jun 9, 2008, at 1:19 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 10:05 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi David,
>
>> This is on an 8-core 2GHz xeon running debian. (Tom Boothby's
>> machine.)
>>
>> In a c
eed of long integer
multiplication and division. I am not a GP expert --- how does one
generate large random integers in GP? I could try multiplying them to
see how long that takes.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email t
hat lets you know that Jason's GMP patch was actually applied.
In which version of sage did we switch to gmp 4.2.2? I will try
building the previous version on this machine and compare results.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send emai
; CPU times: user 1.50 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 1.50 s
> Wall time: 1.50
>
> It looks like the conversion from sage.lib.pari.gen.gen to
> sage.rings.rational.Rational just converts y to a string and then
> parses
> the resulting string, which is why this takes so long.
Th
I think the person involved with coordinating the
modular q-expansion code is William Stein himself,
so I'm cc'ing the sage-devel list for others interested
in this info. My guess is that, if William doesn't
know about this Pari code already then he will want
to know what license it is released u
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:43 PM, David Harvey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if we are just building GMP incorrectly. That bernf
On Jun 10, 2008, at 10:34 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Problem/question 2: looking at the code in ell_generic.py I find that
> there are now *3* different implementations of division polys of
> various kinds.
>
> (1) E.division_pol = E.torsion_pol is by David Kohel (2005-04-25)
Not-a-Number)."
What does it mean for a floating point number to be of the form
1251#175? Is that supposed to be a reference to an image file? I
looked at the HTML source and didn't quite understand it.
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gr
; expired
> #3040: William Stein, Craig Citro: make it so magma(A) works for
> matrices over cyclotomic number fields
> #3042: William Stein, Craig Citro, Robert Bradshaw: cyclolinalg --
> make a new type for cyclotomic linear algebra
> #3130: David Joyner: permgps: added normal_subgr
value. This means that
only the function name is pickled, along with the name of module the
function is defined in. Neither the function's code, nor any of its
function attributes are pickled. Thus the defining module must be
importable in the unpickling environment, and the module must cont
One way to get around this limitation in python is to use callable
classes instead of functions.
David
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:42 AM, David Harvey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
>
> Some code that has been proposed by Nico
On Jun 18, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> [1]: http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/02/27/the-cost-of-monoculture/
> [2]: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=412
> [3]: http://www.korealawblog.com/entry/
> why_you_cant_buy_anything_on_line_in_korea_mr_foreigner
Holy
sage.math seems to be back up. At least, I'm logged in to it. ;-)
David
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:47 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sage.math is down and I don't have physical access to the machine right now.
> Reminder: a backup from y
test Sage on those suites you
suggest. It's just a question of someone offering to come forward and
do the work!
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [E
I think the extra links "Try Sage online!" and "Try it online!" look
a bit weird. Maybe it would be better if they were somehow part of
the main menu thing in the middle of the screen.
On the downloads page, there is a space missing before "additional
instructions
+1
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:00 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose adding pyprocessing as a standard spkg to Sage.
> http://pyprocessing.berlios.de/
>
> This is *by far* the best tool I've ever seen for making use of multiple
> processors on a
n]
> #3341: Mike Hansen: fix minor issue with creating skew partitions by
> dividing partitions [Reviewed by Martin Albrecht]
> #3347: John Palmieri: lots of changes to the tutorial [Reviewed by
> Mike Hansen]
> #3371: Francis Clarke, Craig Citro: bug in uniformiSer for p-adic
> rin
I'm with William. I was pretty happy when Francois reported (or more
precisely reminded me, since I think I knew and forgot) that xmaxima was
available. This means that openmath plotter (like jmol, but using tcl.tk
instead of java) is available too, whenever tcl/tk is installed.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2
301 - 400 of 6542 matches
Mail list logo
