Hi Nils,
On 2018-05-31, Nils Bruin wrote:
> I am not sure this is the case. For instance, numerical in-place LU
> decomposition algorithms tend to use the lower triangular half of the
> matrix to keep track of the transformations that lead to echelon form, so
> there may be good reasons to onl
Suggestion:
(1) Use unique representation for "ambient" objects ( GL(n,k), O(n,k,e),
QQ^n).
(2) Do not use unique representation for subobjects.
(3) Give the .subobject(self, gens) method a (weak?) cache.
(4) Modify == to test equality as subobjects/subsets.
--
You received this message because
Hi all,
I've been aware for a while that some libraries are not happy that their
package is not explicitly mentioned by name on the sagemath.org home page
and that you have to click through to the "and many more" to see their
package credited.
I have a suggestion how this could be made more eq
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 8:46:52 AM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been aware for a while that some libraries are not happy that their
> package is not explicitly mentioned by name on the sagemath.org home page
> and that you have to click through to the "and many more" to see t
In trying to upgrade (via git pull from trac, the develop branch) from
8.2.beta5 to current develop, I am having difficulty early on, while
building pkgconf. Honestly, I'm not even sure why pkgconf instead of
pkgconfig is being installed (I missed that whole discussion), but anyway
here is the
Done. [1]
[1] https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/133
On Friday, 1 June 2018 15:12:31 UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 8:46:52 AM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been aware for a while that some libraries are not happy that their
>> package is not
On Friday, 1 June 2018 15:12:31 UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> This seems very reasonable; the list probably dates to a much earlier time
> when there were some "main" dependencies but now there are SO many ... Can
> you make a ticket on http://github.com/sagemath/website so that Harald
> (and
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:22 AM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 1 June 2018 15:12:31 UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> This seems very reasonable; the list probably dates to a much earlier time
>> when there were some "main" dependencies but now there are SO many ... Can
>> you m
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
wrote:
> I have a suggestion how this could be made more equitable for the many
> dependencies of Sage.
Regarding revamping the main landing page, i think it should be done
in a way in which all design decisions are focused around maximiz
Le vendredi 1 juin 2018 16:52:27 UTC+2, William a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
> E.g., there should be a much more
> prominent link to Gregory Bard's book "Sage for undergrads", and for
> the French (and soon English) book that Paul Z. started -- since many,
> many potential users of Sage are lost
On Friday, 1 June 2018 16:48:14 UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> >
> > As I say, I don't think it is justifiable, except on technical and
> > historical grounds. The work of all of those people is obviously, and
> has
> > obviously always been highly regarded and valued.
>
> PR's are very, very wel
On Friday, 1 June 2018 18:02:35 UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> hence my suggestion to randomise the shortlist or remove it.
>
Another technical solution, if the list is retained in any form on the
front page, would be to have a scrolling list. This might reduce the
technical task to the inserti
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 10:23 AM 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 1 June 2018 18:02:35 UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> hence my suggestion to randomise the shortlist or remove it.
>>
>
> Another technical solution, if the list is retained in any form o
On 01/06/18 17:51, William Stein wrote:
But further, linking to dependencies should be done much more, but in
a way that provides clear value to users:
- being able to read the original upstreams docs and source code more easily
One idea in this direction: I usually use `function?` or `func
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:15 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> In trying to upgrade (via git pull from trac, the develop branch) from
> 8.2.beta5 to current develop, I am having difficulty early on, while
> building pkgconf. Honestly, I'm not even sure why pkgconf instead of
> pkgconfig is being installed (I
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:15 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>> In trying to upgrade (via git pull from trac, the develop branch) from
>> 8.2.beta5 to current develop, I am having difficulty early on, while
>> building pkgconf. Honestly, I'm not even sure w
This morning, the trac server seems to be down with
ERR_TIMED_OUT
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
17 matches
Mail list logo
