On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:13:50AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 30/01/2012 03:10, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> >Working on the ARM port (kudos to Snark), which has, unlike x86,
> >unsigned char, we stumbled upon several places in Sage library (in
> >Cython code) where char type was used for (essen
On Monday 30 January 2012, you wrote:
> Dear Martin,
Hi Benjamin, (CC [sage-devel] where I think this discussion belongs),
> I do know C - and I've dowloaded the M4RI library. I was considering
> writing up
> some C code (and use ctypes to tie back to python/sage)
> which would wrap M4RI more d
On Monday 30 January 2012, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 30/01/2012 03:10, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > Working on the ARM port (kudos to Snark), which has, unlike x86,
> > unsigned char, we stumbled upon several places in Sage library (in
> > Cython code) where char type was used for (essentially) oper
Le 30/01/2012 09:43, Martin Albrecht a écrit :
Did you by any chance test whether switching to unsigned char in the
matrix_mod2 reduce function indeed fixes the issue? I don't have an ARM box
here to test?
I will try that as soon as Dima will have confirmed I'm not stepping on
his toes doing s
As a code sample:
from libc.stdint cimport *
cdef int8_t ok_int8 = 127
cdef int8_t bad_int8 = 128
cdef uint8_t ok_uint8 = 255
cdef uint8_t bad_uint8 = 256
print "127 ==", ok_int8 # output is 127 == 127
print "127 !=", bad_int8 # output is 127 != -128
print "255 ==", ok_uint8 # o
Le 30/01/2012 04:12, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I will try that as soon as Dima will have confirmed I'm not stepping on
his toes doing so.
He did, I tried, it worked :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12386
One more ARM problem down *g*
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send
On 1/29/12 7:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Monday, 30 January 2012 03:49:45 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote:
Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later
you found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find
something even better than three.js? :P As to
On 1/30/12 2:36 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Dear Martin,
Hi Benjamin, (CC [sage-devel] where I think this discussion belongs),
Of course, an implementation that uses the library routines directly
will be the fastest. However, this is still pretty sad for the standard
code. I looked into it
Dear developers,
I downloaded a sage-4.8 .dmg installer for OS X (10.6.8 in my case).
On the first launch it tells me about relocation, after that Sage
works OK.
Now I am trying to upgrade some of my spkg and Distutils doesn't seem
to find the proper include and lib paths. Therefore gcc and gfort
Hello everybody !!!
I wondered why we still had .py files in our library. Some time ago
this made sense as there were Python features that were not available
in Cython -- like the yield keyword -- but now that they are, what is
the point ? I'm asking this because we have in the Graph classes which
Hi Maximillian,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:27:45 +0100
Maximilian Trescher wrote:
> I'm very new to the developers list.
> About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using
> sage regularly for some physical calculations.
>
> Three days ago I wondered if there is any possibility t
On Jan 30, 2012 5:12 AM, "Nathann Cohen" wrote:
>
> Hello everybody !!!
>
> I wondered why we still had .py files in our library. Some time ago
> this made sense as there were Python features that were not available
> in Cython -- like the yield keyword -- but now that they are, what is
> the poin
Hell !!
> If you ever change a filebfrom Python to Cython for no clear good reason,
I
> will be very annoyed.
Well, the point's always to be able to rewrite code more efficiently :-p
> One should always use Python instead of Cython unless
> there is a clear compelling reason not to.
Rea
On Jan 30, 2012 8:09 AM, "Nathann Cohen" wrote:
>
> Hell !!
>
>
> > If you ever change a filebfrom Python to Cython for no clear good
reason, I
> > will be very annoyed.
>
> Well, the point's always to be able to rewrite code more efficiently :-p
>
>
> > One should always use Python instea
> I would even add this to the review checklist.
Well... O_o
> It takes nearly an hour on one cpu to build the sage library now right?
> If you change all .py to .pyx, it might take 2 hours. That .5 seconds
you site can be longer for bigger files and adds up.
Well, that's mostly libraries, isn
Le 30/01/2012 17:16, William Stein a écrit :
On Jan 30, 2012 8:09 AM, "Nathann Cohen" mailto:nathann.co...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Come ooon ! Half a second when you rebuild Sage !!! How bad can
that be ?
>
It takes nearly an hour on one cpu to build the sage library now right?
If you change
> Spoiled, both of you.
>
> If I touch devel/sage/sage/graph/graph_decompositions/vertex_separation.pyx,
> then run sage -b, it takes already more than 30s on my little ARM box.
THIS file takes 30 seconds ? O_O
How long did it take to build Sage on this machine ? And how fast is
that machine by
Le 30/01/2012 17:28, Nathann Cohen a écrit :
Spoiled, both of you.
If I touch devel/sage/sage/graph/graph_decompositions/vertex_separation.pyx,
then run sage -b, it takes already more than 30s on my little ARM box.
THIS file takes 30 seconds ? O_O
How long did it take to build Sage on this m
Hi,
thanks for the hint.
i looked into it (shortly), this seems the way to go,
but again my question is:
is there interest in it?
I could/would rewrite it using this infrastructure, but only if there
are people interested in it...
thanks
Maximilian
>
> You should use the infrastructure (written
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> I would even add this to the review checklist.
>
> Well... O_o
>
>
>> It takes nearly an hour on one cpu to build the sage library now right?
>> If you change all .py to .pyx, it might take 2 hours. That .5 seconds
>> you site can be longe
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 7:42:4
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:16 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2012 8:09 AM, "Nathann Cohen" wrote:
>>
>> Hell !!
>>
>>
>> > If you ever change a filebfrom Python to Cython for no clear good
>> > reason, I
>> > will be very annoyed.
>>
>> Well, the point's always to be able to rewri
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:20:50 Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I jut tried to compile Sage 4.8 and 5.0.beta1 on a OS X 10.6.8 (Snow
> Leopard) without success.
>
> I just did:
> export MAKE="make -j8"
> make
>
> Even after R fails the compilation goes a bit further and stops. Please
This is really helpful Martin!
Thank you very much.
I shall have a thorough look at this.
And I would be very happy to contribute too.
Regards,
Ermis
On Jan 29, 8:41 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2012, Ermis wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am focusing on the LLL algori
Hi Bill,
I will have a look at this p^2+p+1 algorithm.
I haven't tried flint to be honest. This might be an alternative
solution.
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Ermis
On Jan 29, 9:55 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> There's an LLL in flint 1.5, called ULLL which is very fast for large
> lattice entries.
For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is in
the app store:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
I would love any feedback, big or small. Be warned, interacts are supported
yet.
-Ivan
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage
On 1/30/12 4:39 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is in
the app store:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
I would love any feedback, big or small. Be warned, interacts are supported
yet.
For those th
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is
> in the app store:
>
> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
I don't see it in an itunes search for "sage math"
>
> I would love any feedba
On Jan 30, 2012, at 14:39 , Ivan Andrus wrote:
> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is
> in the app store:
>
> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
>
> I would love any feedback, big or small. Be warned, interacts are supported
On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is
>> in the app store:
>>
>> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
>
> I don't see it in
On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 14:39 , Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is
>> in the app store:
>>
>> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8
>>
>> I would love an
On 1/29/12 1:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you
found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something
even better than three.js? :P As to who would be a good community to ask
about this stuff, though, I have no idea.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is
>>> in the app store:
>>>
>>> http://itunes.apple.com/us/
Just to make sure this is found by anyone searching this thread:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12399
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12400
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12401
are followup tickets with some of the stuff from the "port" attached
or copied.
--
To
On 1/29/12 9:41 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:52 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Ivan's iPhone app is cool. However, when it links to sagenb or
sagemath.org, it looks ... unhelpful. Perhaps this is possible to fix
easily - exchange below. Is there someone for whom this would be only
epsi
On Jan 30, 2012 5:27 PM, "David Joyner" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
> >>> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone
app is
On Jan 30, 2012 8:17 PM, "William Stein" wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2012 5:27 PM, "David Joyner" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
> > > On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
> > >>> For those w
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2012 8:17 PM, "William Stein" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2012 5:27 PM, "David Joyner" wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Andrus
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> > >> O
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2012 8:17 PM, "William Stein" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2012 5:27 PM, "David Joyner" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Andrus
>>> > w
On my patch, the patchbot shows a red swirling symbol with the following log:
...
--
sage: Building and installing modified Sage library files.
Installing c_lib
gcc -o src/convert.os -c -fPIC
-I/levi/scratch/robertwb/buildbot/sage-4.8/lo
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2012 8:17 PM, "William Stein" wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012 5:27 PM, "David Joyner"
Hi Kwankyu,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> src/convert.c:56: fatal error: error closing /tmp/ccj9Gz6N.s: No space left
> on device
> compilation terminated.
> scons: *** [src/convert.os] Error 1
> ERROR: There was an error building c_lib.
> ...
>
> This does not seem a faul
Thanks for explaining me. 16G seems small, considering the (huge, I think)
amount of loads on the patchbot.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
Hi, Ifti,
On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
[snip]
>>
>> I think I figured it out. I first have to upgrade my iTunes on my Mac
>> and then upgrade iOS o
On 01/30/2012 08:27 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Just to make sure this is found by anyone searching this thread:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12399
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12400
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12401
are followup tickets with some of the stuff fr
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Thanks for explaining me. 16G seems small, considering the (huge, I think)
> amount of loads on the patchbot.
No, 16GB should be fine. Unfortunately, the problem is that the
patchbot keeps "crashing" and dumping some sort of massive output fi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> Hi, Ifti,
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
> [snip]
>>>
>>> I think I figured it out.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 22:51 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> Hi, Ifti,
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
[snip]
>> In order to run the "sage math " app, you need to have iOS 5.x installed on
>> your iDevice. In o
How about setting "ulimit -c 0" (coredumpsize) for the patch bot?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/s
Done. Now if only I could figure out why the doctests keep crashing...
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> How about setting "ulimit -c 0" (coredumpsize) for the patch bot?
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this
Hi folks,
When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance
nohup sage test.sage > out.txt &
the process is listed in the 'top' command display as 'python'. How do
I give user-generated names to this 'python' process for the purpose
of identification?
Regards,
Ifti
[1] h
51 matches
Mail list logo
