On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/2010 8:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/14/10 07:00 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
I find it amusing that mathematicians are being told that
a math-sp
hi list,
On Sunday started to install all experimental packages by
sage -experimental | grep --color -vE 'INSTALLED|NOT|Type' | xargs sage -i
and it's still building.
Is this normal, or did i run into a endless loop?
my configuration:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz
2GB Ram
Linux n
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2010-11-15 17:23, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> But surely if a bug is found, it should be on trac.
>
> Should a PARI bug be on the Sage Trac? What's the point if it already
> was reported to PARI?
I think the point is that another Sage u
>
>>
>> If Mathematica does use a pseudo prime test, it is not documented.
>>
>> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/RandomPrime.html
>
> It is completely clear from the documentation above Mathematica *only* uses
> a pseudo prime test. It says right there "gives a pseudorandom prime numb
On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed two issues with random_prime() in Sage.
>>
>> 1) Whilst Sage's random_prime() looks as though it will work for numbers
>> to at least 10^1, if one specifies
On 16 November 2010 09:31, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>> What version of Sage are you using, and on what computer?
>
> 4.6.1.alpha1 with the two patches at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10112
>
> which are both related to random_prime().
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've noticed two issues with random_prime() in Sage.
>>>
>>> 1) Whilst Sage's random_prime() looks as though it will w
Hi,
A developer of R attempted to pull the part of the Bash source code
responsible for the "operate-and-get-next" feature into R interface.
See the following link:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/readline-operate-and-get-next-td2317208.html
I want to do the same thing for Sage. As I am ignorant o
It is surely a bug, Sage does not compute the right factorization.
This is now #10279
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://gro
On 16 November 2010 09:43, William Stein wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>>> It is completely clear from the documentation above Mathematica *only* uses
>>> a pseudo prime test. It says right there "gives a pseudora
Hi,
I would like to compute the gcd of two bi-variate polynomials over a number
field:
sage: R = PolynomialRing( QQ, var( 't' ), order = 'lex' )
sage: t = R.gens()[0]
sage: T = NumberFieldTower( [t ** 2 - t + 1], 'a0' )
sage: a0 = T.gens()[0]
sage: R = R.change_ring( T )
sage:
On Nov 16, 12:28 pm, Niels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to compute the gcd of two bi-variate polynomials over a number
> field:
>
> sage: R = PolynomialRing( QQ, var( 't' ), order = 'lex' )
> sage: t = R.gens()[0]
> sage: T = NumberFieldTower( [t ** 2 - t + 1], 'a0' )
> sage: a0
Hi,
Just realized that gcd( [( a0 + 1 ) * x , ( a0 + 1 ) * x * y] )=x is
correct.
This makes me wonder whether to exception of the second gcd
(after adjoining a1) is a bug, or whether my construction of the numberfield
is
incorrect.
Maybe i should have asked this question at sage-support
Kind
Thanks :-)
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:02 PM, luisfe wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 16, 12:28 pm, Niels wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to compute the gcd of two bi-variate polynomials over a
> number
> > field:
> >
> > sage: R = PolynomialRing( QQ, var( 't' ), order = 'lex' )
> > sage: t = R.ge
There are some pretty big experimental packages, so perhaps its
"normal". But it doesn't seem like a good idea; some of those
packages have overlaps (vtk-related ones for example), and are hard to
build, so I think there's a good chance you'll get a bunch of broken
pieces.
-M.Hampton
On Nov 16,
> > Eg, how would you
> > interpret the docs for PrimeQ?
> >http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/PrimeQ.html
>
> I would interpret that as Mathematica's PrimeQ[] tests with 100%
> certainty if the number is prime or not.
Mma probably uses the fast "psuedo-primality tests" in the range wher
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:18 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> On 16 November 2010 09:43, William Stein wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, David Kirkby wrote:
> >> On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>
> >>> It is completely clear from the documentation above Mathematica *only*
>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Johannes wrote:
> hi list,
> On Sunday started to install all experimental packages by
Read the message at the top of the page about experimental packages:
http://sagemath.org/packages/experimental/
"These are EXPERIMENTAL! They probably won't work at all for yo
On 14 November 2010 20:52, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
>> In the developer documentation, in the section "Headings of Sage library
>> code files", there is an example heading stating
>> #*
Hello,
Does anybody get the same kind of error as below and manage to solve
it ? Otherwise, I will send a mail to the mercurial team to figure out
what's up.
Best,
Vincent
pushing to http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/
searching for changes
** unknown exception encountered, details follow
** r
On 2010-11-16 19:33, David Kirkby wrote:
> " Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL).
> You may use any version of the GPL you want. "
This would be a change in policy which I explicitly did not want to do.
It is already stated in other places that Sage is licenced und
On Nov 16, 10:22 am, William Stein wrote:
> [...]
> They mention that Mathematica does have a "proof = True" version of
> PrimeQ called ProvablePrimeQ that one can optionally load. I just
> tried it on a 200-digit number and it took 22 seconds as compared to 3
> seconds in PARI (hence Sage).
T
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:18 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> On 16 November 2010 09:43, William Stein wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, David Kirkby
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 16 November 2010 06:57, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> >>> It i
On 16 November 2010 03:06, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Nov 15, 3:06 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> The newer compression algorithms make a huge difference. I know on Solaris, a
>> binary is 500 MB with gz, but drops to 300 MB with .7z.
>
> How does bzip2 fare?
I don't have any numbers with me. bzip2
The problem may come from incompatibility between mercurial on my
laptop (hg 1.3.1 distributed with Sage) and mercurial on the server at
combinat.sagemath.org. Does anybody knows its version (or how obtain
it) ?
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c
On 16 November 2010 18:22, William Stein wrote:
> I'm idly curious about how all of Mathematica's interpreter level
> source code of functions is encrypted..
> William Stein
http://www.mathematica-users.org/webMathematica/wiki/wiki.jsp?pageName=FAQ_Writing_Packages
will probably give you a pre
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:14 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 16 November 2010 18:22, William Stein wrote:
>
>> I'm idly curious about how all of Mathematica's interpreter level
>> source code of functions is encrypted..
>
>> William Stein
>
> http://www.mathematica-users.org/webMathematica/wiki/wiki
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2010-11-16 19:33, David Kirkby wrote:
>> " Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL).
>> You may use any version of the GPL you want. "
-1, since most people contributed under the GPLv2+ condition, and the
perm
On 11/16/2010 02:19 PM, Vincent D wrote:
> The problem may come from incompatibility between mercurial on my
> laptop (hg 1.3.1 distributed with Sage) and mercurial on the server at
> combinat.sagemath.org. Does anybody knows its version (or how obtain
> it) ?
I see
s...@sagemath:~$ which hg
/usr
those hints helped me:
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/107/building-atlas
greatz
Am 17.11.2010 00:42, schrieb Johannes:
> Hi list,
> today I tried to build the newset sage Version on my system from the
> sources and it fails.
>
> this seems to be the imporant part of the install log for me:
>
>
> those hints helped me:
> http://ask.sagemath.org/question/107/building-atlas
>
Was the issue that ATLAS had not finished building yet?
Francois
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl
I forwarded this to sage-combinat-devel
On Nov 17, 2:40 am, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody get the same kind of error as below and manage to solve
> it ? Otherwise, I will send a mail to the mercurial team to figure out
> what's up.
>
> Best,
> Vince
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 at 02:01AM -0800, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A developer of R attempted to pull the part of the Bash source code
> responsible for the "operate-and-get-next" feature into R interface.
> See the following link:
>
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/readline-operate-and-get-next-t
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 11/14/10 08:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> There is some work being done at #9418 at make GNU patch a standard
>>> package such that, in the future
No, building ATLAS failed.
Am 17.11.2010 04:16, schrieb François Bissey:
>> those hints helped me:
>> http://ask.sagemath.org/question/107/building-atlas
>>
>>
> Was the issue that ATLAS had not finished building yet?
>
> Francois
>
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel
35 matches
Mail list logo
