Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3 is out. The changes over 3.2.3.final are minimal, but we
should now support OpenSUSE 11.1 out of the box. We also fixed one
segfault issue exposed by doctesting as well as one performance
regression in primes_first_n. You can download Sage 3.2.3 from
http://www.sagemat
Hi,
I dabbled a little with the vmware version of Sage and was able to
install EditArea, a javascript syntax highlighting library (http://
www.cdolivet.net/index.php?page=editArea). It is quite useful when
editing Python and can be turned on or off. It also allows callbacks
so pressing the save b
Dear Michael,
On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Please report any issues you see.
Upgrade on OpenSuse 10.2, AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3700+ went fine.
Plus: My favorite benchmark (cohomology rings of all groups of order
64) appears to be 3% faster.
I wonder why. Coincidence? Or did something
On Jan 6, 3:14 am, Simon King wrote:
> Dear Michael,
Hi Simon,
> On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Please report any issues you see.
>
> Upgrade on OpenSuse 10.2, AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3700+ went fine.
Ok, upgrade from 3.2.2?
> Plus: My favorite benchmark (cohomology rings of all
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 3:14 am, Simon King wrote:
>> Dear Michael,
>
> Hi Simon,
>
>> On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>> > Please report any issues you see.
>>
>> Upgrade on OpenSuse 10.2, AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3700+ went fine.
>
> Ok, upgrade
Hi, I got a possible bug from the notebook's bug report link. Is there
somebody who could confirm this? I didn't found something in trac...
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ver?key=pCwvGVwSMxTzT6E2xNdo5fA&t=1231239688226000&pt=1231239668226000&diffWidget=true&s=AJVazbWGmhG3lc0ZC-EUq7UehwJbk9WWmQ
V
Hello folks,
in order to make regression testing easier I have started building
older Sage releases (+ the current one) from 3.2.3 on backwards in
/disk/scratch/mabshoff-sage-releases
on sage.math. These are accessible to everybody and for example in
case of 3.2.2 will be slightly patched to
Hi,
I got the following bug report. Can someone test and open a ticket in
case this is still an issue/a real bug?
Cheers,
Michael
OS Type:Linux 32-bit
Release:Ubuntu 8.04
GNOME: 2.22.3
SAGE Version 3.1.2, Release Date: 2008-09-19
When using the SAGE notebook with typ
Hi, I got this bug report from notebook's bug report link. Somebody
who could confirm this? I didn't find something related in trac, just
an older ticket where the settings dialog was implemented...
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ver?key=pCwvGVwSMxTzT6E2xNdo5fA&t=1231239989543000&pt=1231239969543
done: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4945
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
_jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de
--~--~
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> in order to make regression testing easier I have started building
> older Sage releases (+ the current one) from 3.2.3 on backwards in
>
> /disk/scratch/mabshoff-sage-releases
>
> on sage.math. These are accessible to everybody and for example in
> case of
I fixed this in one of the notebook tickets needing review.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> Hi, I got this bug report from notebook's bug report link. Somebody
> who could confirm this? I didn't find something related in trac, just
> an older ticket where the settings
On Jan 6, 9:08 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> I like this idea. One of things that is very attractive about Sage is
> that I can release a paper with code that runs on a specific version of
> Sage and people will have access to that version to run that code.
>
>
Hi Michael,
On Jan 6, 5:17 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> > Upgrade on OpenSuse 10.2, AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3700+ went fine.
>
> Ok, upgrade from 3.2.2?
Yes.
> > Plus: My favorite benchmark (cohomology rings of all groups of order
> > 64) appears to be 3% faster.
> > I wonder why. Coincidence? Or did
jsMath has some extensions, like 'verb' and 'AMSmath': see the web
pages http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/verb.html and
http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/AMSmath.html, for
example.
1. Does it make sense to load these automatically in sage?
2. To fix a bug, I would like
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> jsMath has some extensions, like 'verb' and 'AMSmath': see the web
> pages http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/verb.html and
> http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/AMSmath.html, for
> example.
>
> 1. Does it make sen
On Jan 6, 1:36 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > jsMath has some extensions, like 'verb' and 'AMSmath': see the web
> > pageshttp://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/verb.htmland
> >http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/aut
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 9:08 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> I like this idea. One of things that is very attractive about Sage is
>> that I can release a paper with code that runs on a specific version of
>> Sage a
On Jan 6, 5:37 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> In light of the fact that we now seem to have nearly infinite disk
> space (thanks NSF!!),
> and sagenb.org is a vmware image, and because of
> my remark above, I think it would be completely f
Hi:
Sage is getting a really good reception here at the
AMS conference. I am posting to
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sagedays/ams2009/
some of the photos from the booth and panel. Several
developers stopped by, for example Kiran Kedlaya and Jason Grout.
The booth is more out-of-the-wa
20 matches
Mail list logo
