On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:17 AM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 3:14 am, Simon King <k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de> wrote:
>> Dear Michael,
>
> Hi Simon,
>
>> On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Please report any issues you see.
>>
>> Upgrade on OpenSuse 10.2, AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3700+ went fine.
>
> Ok, upgrade from 3.2.2?
>
>> Plus: My favorite benchmark (cohomology rings of all groups of order
>> 64) appears to be 3% faster.
>> I wonder why. Coincidence? Or did something change with Cython?
>
> Mhh, if it is reproducibly 3% (i.e. if this isn't some numerical
> jitter and doesn't take into account start up time) I would guess
> "#4939: William Stein: massive performance regression to
> primes_first_n" might play a role here since your code likely doesn't
> improve from using FLINT for example, but that is a guess on my end.

No, that can't be it.  Any code affected by #4939 would be affected in
such a way that it would no longer run, since I simply removed the
leave_pari=True option (which nobody would use).   I didn't make
anything else faster.

 -- William

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to