Hello everybody.
GD compilation has failed, here is the location of the log file :
http://download239.mediafire.com/0mqt4mnnnqgg/owtzzzjyymm/install.log.bz2
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Oct 19, 2008, at 13:33 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 19, 12:19 pm, Travis Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Travis,
>
>> I was attempting to build sage 3.1.4 on mac os x 10.5.5 with Xcode
>> 3.1 (gcc 4.2) installed.
>
> Did you select gcc 4.2 via gcc_select? I tried bui
Robert and Tim,
Thanks for your responses. Perhaps it is time I start reading the Sage
Developer's Guide. :)
-- Kyle
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Oct 20, 1:44 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2008, at 13:33 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 19, 12:19 pm, Travis Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> > Hi Travis,
>
> >> I was attempting to build sage 3.1.4 on mac os x 10.5.5 with Xcode
> >>
John Voight and I are having trouble with the patch I attached to
#4249 (see below). On my machines I get a doctest failure, while on
his he does not. Please could someone else try? the patch should
apply equally to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4.
John
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sage <[EM
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:38:56PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
>
> John Voight and I are having trouble with the patch I attached to
> #4249 (see below). On my machines I get a doctest failure, while on
> his he does not. Please could someone else try? the patch should
> apply equally to 3.1.3 o
On Oct 20, 2008, at 04:38 , John Cremona wrote:
>
> John Voight and I are having trouble with the patch I attached to
> #4249 (see below). On my machines I get a doctest failure, while on
> his he does not. Please could someone else try? the patch should
> apply equally to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4.
Tr
Hi,
There will be a Sage Bug Day this Thursday, October 23, 2008:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug14
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send em
Hello,
I'd like to call Sage from Java. As far as I understand, there is no
ready solution yet.
I suppose, one option would be to use sage notebook server, is there a
document describing its communication protocol?
Another option would be to use some generic way of calling Python from
Java, e.g
Hello,
You can look at this thread for an example of how to communicate with
the notebook server via Java:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/197e1597ac860794/22455d9058f3f59e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=why+python+scripts+take+longer#22455d9058f3f59e
--Mike
On Mon, Oct 20, 20
On Oct 20, 8:59 am, yegor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call Sage from Java. As far as I understand, there is no
> ready solution yet.
>
> I suppose, one option would be to use sage notebook server, is there a
> document describing its communication protocol?
>
> Another op
Hello folks,
here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please give it a
try and give feedback For a source tarball and a sage.math only
tarball see
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
On Oct 20, 8:21 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There will be a Sage Bug Day this Thursday, October 23, 2008:
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug14
I guess we will start at 10 am PST as usual. 3.2.alpha0 will also be
out in about an hour (I am running the final round of
yegor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call Sage from Java. As far as I understand, there is no
> ready solution yet.
>
> I suppose, one option would be to use sage notebook server, is there a
> document describing its communication protocol?
No, but Robert Bradshaw put together a simple http pr
Hi,
I traced this down to integral_elements_with_trace not handling the
signs in pari's output of qfminim properly. It will only return a single
element from each pair of conjugates, and depending on
F.reduced_basis(), it might miss elements in ZZ with the required trace
entirely.
sage: F. = Num
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:21 PM, David R. Kohel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi William,
>
>> Have you seen this: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4322
>
> No, actually I didn't get an e-mail about it. This can be reduced to
> a crash in the follow example:
>
> sage: P. = PolynomialRing(
On Oct 20, 2008, at 07:33 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 04:38 , John Cremona wrote:
>
>>
>> John Voight and I are having trouble with the patch I attached to
>> #4249 (see below). On my machines I get a doctest failure, while on
>> his he does not. Please could someone el
Hi folks,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:04 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
>
> #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
> 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona]
> #4272: Michael Abshoff: add
Built and tested without a glitch on 32-bit gentoo machine.
Best,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:24 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.2.alpha0. The big new thing is the pynac interface.
> Other than that various fixes, features and doctests. Please gi
Hi folks,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:04 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
>
> #4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
> 100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona]
> #4272: Michael Abshoff: add
20 matches
Mail list logo
