[sage-devel] Re: nc algebra?

2007-12-27 Thread Michel
There is also the "affine" package in maxima. Regards, Michel On Dec 27, 5:46 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > what about the non-commutative part of Singular (formerly known as > > "Plural")? > > Singular-Plural has one disadvantage though: It can not deal with free >

[sage-devel] Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-27 Thread William Stein
Hi, What *standard* Sage spkg packages are out of date right now (I'm skimming http://sagemath.org/components.html)? * cddlib: we ship 094b, but 094d is current. * clisp: we ship clisp-2.41, but 2.43 is current (I'm sure you can comment!) * cvxopt: we ship 0.9 but 0.9.1 is out. It has "eff

[sage-devel] Re: error building sage 2.9 on cygwin 1.5.24: tmp-dive_1.s:110: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_386_GOTPC

2007-12-27 Thread William Stein
On Dec 27, 2007 12:31 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just tested and Sage prints a message informing the user that it > > isn't supported, but then goes on happily :) > > > > While I am trying to compile Sage 2.9.1.1 on Cygwin I ran into the > > same problem and the quite old

[sage-devel] Re: latex functions in SAGE?

2007-12-27 Thread William Stein
On Dec 21, 2007 5:35 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder what SAGE developers think of the following idea: > to include in SAGE some functions which make the > creation of latex structures easier (for the purpose of > writing papers, etc). I'm thinking of two things: > (a) outpu

[sage-devel] sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread William Stein
Hi, Who is the release manager for Sage-2.9.2? I'm hoping for a good release, which happens by Jan 4, 2008, in time for making some DVD's for the AMS meeting and having some user testing. It should thus be a bug-fix conservative, etc., release. I'm guessing Michael Abshoff should be release ma

[sage-devel] Fwd: About SAGE

2007-12-27 Thread William Stein
Hi, I occasionally get emails like the one below. There's no way I have the time or inclination to burn and mail out DVD's of Sage to people. Does anybody: (1) want to volunteer to do this sort of thing in exchange for some "shipping and handling fees"; then all such requests get

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 27, 9:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Who is the release manager for Sage-2.9.2? I'm hoping for a good > release, which > happens by Jan 4, 2008, in time for making some DVD's for the AMS meeting and > having some user testing. It should thus be a bug-fix co

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-27 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 27, 9:18 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What *standard* Sage spkg packages are out of date right now > (I'm skimminghttp://sagemath.org/components.html)? > > * cddlib: we ship 094b, but 094d is current. > * clisp: we ship clisp-2.41, but 2.43 is current (I'm

[sage-devel] Re: writing an interpeter for mathematica language

2007-12-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Dec 26, 2007 7:33 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 26, 6:22 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 26, 2007 6:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 25, 2007 3:32 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: About SAGE

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 3:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I occasionally get emails like the one below. There's no way I have the > time or inclination to burn and mail out DVD's of Sage to people. Does > anybody: > >(1) want to volunteer to do this sort of thing in excha

[sage-devel] Re: Most Sage spkg's are out of date!

2007-12-27 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 27, 9:18 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What *standard* Sage spkg packages are out of date right now > (I'm skimminghttp://sagemath.org/components.html)? > > * cddlib: we ship 094b, but 094d is current. > * clisp: we ship clisp-2.41, but 2.43 is current (I'm

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Tutorial nits #2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 12:20 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 27, 5:55 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I added a link to a patch on the comment section > > ofhttp://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1544 > > It passes sage -t. > > > > Hi David, > > I assume the bundle

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
On Dec 27, 2007 3:37 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Who is the release manager for Sage-2.9.2? I'm hoping for a good > release, which > happens by Jan 4, 2008, in time for making some DVD's for the AMS meeting and > having some user testing. It should thus be a bug-fix

[sage-devel] Re: Why does sage not use Qemu?

2007-12-27 Thread Martin Albrecht
> Has anybody else actually > _used_ VirtualBox? Maybe it only works on OS X 10.4? I run it under 64-bit Linux and it works quite nice. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EM

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread Harald Schilly
On Dec 27, 9:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... interactive 3d graphics > What do you think? Have you thought more generally about interactive cells? A widget included in the answer-cell, which assignes values to a local variable and then issues an update for reevaluation

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Tutorial nits #2

2007-12-27 Thread David Joyner
A new patch has been posted to http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/tut20071227.hg Passes sage -t. Also, the new version of tut.tex is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/tut.tex This includes the fixes of every typo i know of and some added examples. On Dec 27, 2007

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.15 vs. gcc 4.3.0 20071130 (experimental)

2007-12-27 Thread remo
> This is a triviality. mwrank_elliptic curves need to be initialized > with 5 integers, period. Currently Sage just tried to coerce the 5 > things to integers, whcih some stupid results (e.g. 1.2 gets rounded > to 1 with meaningless results). This is really bad behaviour. If mwrank only except

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.9.2

2007-12-27 Thread Ted Kosan
Harald wrote: > Have you thought more generally about interactive cells? A widget > included in the answer-cell, which assignes values to a local variable > and then issues an update for reevaluation. > I've just written feature request #1613 > http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1613 I have be