Hi
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 05:46:36AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> (3) Maybe (I haven't tested this) do
>sage: notebook(reset=True)
This works fine, thanks. It prompts for a new password and then
continues.
regards,
Jan
--
.~.
/V\ Jan Groenewald
/( )\www.aims.ac.za
^^-^
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 01:07 -0400, didier deshommes wrote:
> 2007/8/14, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that makes sense.
> > If I do this:
> >
> > sage: a = RQDF(5)
> > sage: number_of_partitions(1000)
> > 24061467864032622473692149727991
> > sage
Hi,
I have some problems with the way is_zero() is implemented (or maybe
it is the documentation...)
Is this behavior really desirable?
sage: k = var('k')
sage: pol = 1/(k-1) - 1/k -1/k/(k-1)
sage: pol
-1/((k - 1)*k) - (1/k) + 1/(k - 1)
sage: pol.partial_fraction()
0
sage: pol.is_zero()
False
sag
To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
very little actual memory. My presumption was that the slowness had
something to do with sag
Jaap Spies wrote:
> I'm trying to make a vpython package for SAGE:
> see http://www.vpython.org/index.html
[...]
Got an answer from the VPython mailing list:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Bruce Sherwood wrote:
>>> Dunno whether this might explain the problem that was seen with the Sage
> []
>>> It seems
Bill Hart wrote:
>
Hello,
> To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
> memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
> of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
> very little actual memory. My presumption was that the s
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Michael Abshoff wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine
> > with including
> > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages
> > (I can't remember
> > for sure though
Hi William,
I believe you are the one that is confused about the GPL.
The GPL is a form of copyright that is provided with a
piece of work. In this case I permit people to use Wykobi
under the terms of the GPL open source license as opposed
to say the CPL, LGPL or the Mozilla license.
As for com
Hi William,
I believe you are the one that is confused about the GPL.
The GPL is a form of copyright that is provided with a
piece of work. In this case I permit people to use Wykobi
under the terms of the GPL open source license as opposed
to say the CPL, LGPL, BSD or the Mozilla Public license.
Whatever the fact of the case, I find the tone of this email
offensive. I'm sure I am not the only one. I think an apology is
called for.
John Cremona
On 8/14/07, Arash Partow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> I believe you are the one that is confused about the GPL.
> The GPL is
On 8/14/07, Arash Partow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe you are the one that is confused about the GPL.
> The GPL is a form of copyright that is provided with a
> piece of work. In this case I permit people to use Wykobi
> under the terms of the GPL open source license as opposed
> to say
On 8/14/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See also
>
> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2006-July/006579.html
>
> for a discussion of Python and UCS2 vs. UCS4
>
> Ubuntu and Fedora distribute Python compiled with UCS4.
> Maybe the Python version of SAGE should comply with
Hi,
I changed the install script in python-2.5.1.p3,
replaced:
./configure --prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL"
with
./configure --prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL" --enable-unicode=ucs4
build sage-2.8 with no problems.
--
All tests passed!
Total time fo
On 8/14/07, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first thing I checked upon investigation was if somebody had pushed
> the box into swap and that wasn't the case.
>
> An 'ls -1 > foo.txt' in the now infamous tmp-directory took in excess of
> 10 seconds which is pretty bad and that was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
About 30 seconds of google-ing "gpl commercial" yielded the following
email written by Richard Stallman (see below). Of course, it is
*theoretically* possible that he is also "confused about the GPL", but I
think that's unlikely. Of course, I a
William Stein wrote:
> I would definitely consider making this change, at least as long as nobody
> sees any major problems with it in the next few days. One problem is
> that doing "sage -upgrade" will require rebuilding every Python-related thing
> i SAGE, which will be a bit painful.
>
> An
On 8/14/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Whatever the fact of the case, I find the tone of this email
> offensive. I'm sure I am not the only one. I think an apology is
> called for.
I'm very sorry for not carefully reading the email before moderating
it "send" -- I usually just
Hi,
Recently Waldek created a (forked) version of Axiom called "FriCAS",
which means "free CAS". He set things up so it builds and installs
in the SAGE environment in about 10-15 minutes (instead of hours
for the previous version of Axiom). I've created a SAGE package and
would like to request
Hello,
The build worked perfectly with SAGE 2.7.3 on Ubuntu 7.04 on a Core 2 Duo.
--Mike
On 8/14/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently Waldek created a (forked) version of Axiom called "FriCAS",
> which means "free CAS". He set things up so it builds and installs
>
William Stein wrote:
> for the previous version of Axiom). I've created a SAGE package and
> would like to request SAGE users to test out building this package on
> OS X and Linux. To try the package just do this:
>
> sage -i axiom4sage-0.3.1.spkg
>
> After about 10-15 minutes you s
Worked for me too, MacOSX MacBook.
(and I tried installing the publicly-available optional Axiom package
yesterday and that didn't work)
Paul
Axiom installation finished.
real10m17.685s
user8m5.767s
sys 1m27.710s
Successfully installed axiom4sage-0.3.1
Now cleaning up tmp files.
Maki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Installed successfully on Dell Latitude D620 (Core Duo T2400 1.83GHz)
running Gentoo and sage-2.8. It's slow because the laptop was running
on battery, and hence throttled down.
real29m12.096s
user26m1.034s
sys 1m22.641s
Successfully ins
On Aug 14, 12:59 am, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is exactly what NTL does in its quad float class. Just about every
> function starts and ends with a macro to adjust the fpu, resulting in
> around 7 extra assembly instructions. In the following code, the
> overhead is quite si
installs fine on suse 10.2 amd64 machine running sage 2.8.
On 8/14/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently Waldek created a (forked) version of Axiom called "FriCAS",
> which means "free CAS". He set things up so it builds and installs
> in the SAGE environment in ab
Something goes wrong in LAPACK build:
sage-spkg installed/lapack-20070723 2>&1
lapack-20070723
Machine:
Darwin George.local 8.10.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.0: Wed May 23
16:50:59 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.21.3~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh
powerpc
Deleting directories from past builds of previ
On Aug 14, 11:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Whatever the fact of the case, I find the tone of this email
> > offensive. I'm sure I am not the only one. I think an apology is
> > called for.
>
> I'm very sorry fo
On Aug 14, 2007, at 12:46 , David Harvey wrote:
>
> Something goes wrong in LAPACK build:
>
> sage-spkg installed/lapack-20070723 2>&1
[snip]
> make[2]: *** [lapack_install] Error 126
> Error compiling lapack.
A shot in the dark: can you check your install log for lines
containing "fork:"? I
On Aug 14, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> Something goes wrong in LAPACK build:
>>
>> sage-spkg installed/lapack-20070723 2>&1
> [snip]
>> make[2]: *** [lapack_install] Error 126
>> Error compiling lapack.
>
> A shot in the dark: can you check your install log for lines
> containin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've looked at ticket #59, in which David Kohel says:
William, my student noticed some slow performance with elliptic curves
group law. I think there was a huge overhead in duplication:
sage: E = EllipticCurve([GF(101)(1),3])
sage: P =
On Aug 14, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've looked at ticket #59, in which David Kohel says:
>
>
> William, my student noticed some slow performance with elliptic
> curves
> group law. I think there was a huge overhead in duplication:
>
> sage: E = EllipticCurve([GF(10
On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Worked for me too, MacOSX MacBook.
> (and I tried installing the publicly-available optional Axiom package
> yesterday and that didn't work)
> Paul
>
The previous optional package 'axiom4sage-0.1.1' is compatible only
with versions of Sage prior to 2.8.1 a
It build fine but the I/O is seriously bugged for me, at least for the
displaying of rational functions (but probably wrapping too)...
I paste this:
--
k =
New members are moderated. I didn't post FlameGuy's
email but didn't delete it either. (Both William and I are moderators.
It was addressed to William and didn't think it appropriate
for me to delete emails adressed to him, but I did tell him
I would not post it for obvious reasons.)
I do think it
On 8/14/07, cwitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 12:59 am, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is exactly what NTL does in its quad float class. Just about every
> > function starts and ends with a macro to adjust the fpu, resulting in
> > around 7 extra assembly instructi
On 8/14/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New members are moderated. I didn't post FlameGuy's
> email but didn't delete it either. (Both William and I are moderators.
> It was addressed to William and didn't think it appropriate
> for me to delete emails adressed to him, but I did tell
On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It build fine but the I/O is seriously bugged for me, at least for the
> displaying of rational functions (but probably wrapping too)...
Thanks for the report. I will look into it.
Do other things work ok? E.g. this script that posted
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 8/14/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Whatever the fact of the case, I find the tone of this email
>> offensive. I'm sure I am not the only one. I think an apology is
>> called for.
>
> I'm very sorry for not carefully reading t
I think repeated squaring is not more efficient in all cases. For
example over Z it is only
more efficient if your multiplication algorithm is faster than the
naive one (which is O(n^2) in the number of bits).
So in the case of elliptic curves it really depends on the efficiency
of the addition s
On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It build fine but the I/O is seriously bugged for me, at least for the
> displaying of rational functions (but probably wrapping too)...
> ...
Oops, for the full axiom interface to work reliably you need
sage-2.8.1 or the following patc
39 matches
Mail list logo
