I implemented this at #12047. While I was at it, I also cleaned up the
documentation and added numerical integration to the reference manual.
Please review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12047
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2011-11-08 19:35, William Stein wrote:
>> In this case, dirac_delta is actually a distribution. It
>> is defined as the distribution with the property that
>>
>> integral(dirac_delta, a, b)
>>
>> is 0 if the interval [a,b] does not cont
On 2011-11-08 19:35, William Stein wrote:
> In this case, dirac_delta is actually a distribution. It
> is defined as the distribution with the property that
>
> integral(dirac_delta, a, b)
>
> is 0 if the interval [a,b] does not contain 0, and is 1 if the
> interval [a,b] does contain 0.
Not qu
On 2011-11-08 19:35, William Stein wrote:
> Right now we get a TypeError when trying to evaluate the above, which
> is unfortunate too, but at least it's an error rather than a totally
> wrong answer. With your patch, probably Sage would silently produce
> a wrong answer.
Yes it would always prod
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Currently, in sage-4.7.2:
>
> sage: integral_numerical(log(x), 0, 0)
> (nan, nan)
>
> Mathematically, the integral should certainly be zero: there is a
> primitive function which is continuous and defined at 0. Symbolically,
> we can compute
