On 2011-11-08 19:35, William Stein wrote: > Right now we get a TypeError when trying to evaluate the above, which > is unfortunate too, but at least it's an error rather than a totally > wrong answer. With your patch, probably Sage would silently produce > a wrong answer. Yes it would always produce 0. The problem is that I have no idea how to distinguish
sage: integral_numerical(log(x), 0, 0) from sage: integral_numerical(dirac_delta, 0,0) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
