Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Please everyone write Jupyter with "y" when talking about Project Jupyter and the Jupyter Notebook. Read "Where does the name come from" at: https://github.com/jupyter/design/wiki/Jupyter-Logo#where-does-the-name-come-from : ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On 2015-11-03 12:50, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello tikz lovers!! > > I create a(nother) ticket to use tikz picture with jupiter > (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19515 > ). +1 for making this work in jupiter > (I don't understand the reason of the tic

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 08:27:51 UTC, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > > Thanks William. > > For what it's worth, >> >> view(transducers.GrayCode()) and show(transducers.GrayCode()) >> >> just work also in SageMathCloud -- example: >> >> >> https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/4a5f0542-5873-4

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Thanks William. For what it's worth, > > view(transducers.GrayCode()) and show(transducers.GrayCode()) > > just work also in SageMathCloud -- example: > > > https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/4a5f0542-5873-4eed-a85c-a18c706e8bcd/files/support/2015-11-03-212108-tikz.sagews > > I finally added t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello tikz lovers!! > > I create a(nother) ticket to use tikz picture with jupiter ( > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19515). > (I don't understand the reason of the ticket #18116 and it doesn't work > on my sage 6.9... ) > > For what

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

2015-04-07 12:13 GMT-04:00 Volker Braun : > No, I'm saying its nice functionality but attached at the wrong place. If > you can't use .plot() to generate the graphics the how on earth is a new > user supposed to discover that functionality? Its just a terrible UI. > You're right about that! I gue

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

No, I'm saying its nice functionality but attached at the wrong place. If you can't use .plot() to generate the graphics the how on earth is a new user supposed to discover that functionality? Its just a terrible UI. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 4:30:58 PM UTC+2, Viviane Pons wrote: > > > > 201

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

2015-04-03 4:05 GMT-04:00 Volker Braun : > On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 9:56:40 AM UTC+2, Daniel Krenn wrote: >> >> Actually, it is a short for >> view(latex(transducers.GrayCode())) > > > I know. And who cares? The important point is to present a uniform user > interface for generating graphical

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 9:56:40 AM UTC+2, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > Actually, it is a short for > view(latex(transducers.GrayCode())) I know. And who cares? The important point is to present a uniform user interface for generating graphical output. The _latex_ method of transducers.Gray

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Am 2015-04-03 um 01:27 schrieb Volker Braun: > I didn't even know that that was possible, yet another way to plot stuff > that is not accessible via plot()... > > There is no ticket for refactoring view() into something consistent > except for the awfully vague #18033. IMHO the finite state machin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Le 02/11/2014 23:36, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : 2014-11-02 08:35:25 UTC, tdumont: Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq > packages are new and need to be compiled. > > > On Thursday, Oc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

2014-11-02 08:35:25 UTC, tdumont: > > Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq > > packages are new and need to be compiled. > > > > > > On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > Its in 6.4.beta

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

> > > I think the lack of progress on sagenb is much more due to the > > *simultaneous* existence of the (for now, beta) Jupyter and SMC > projects. > > Nearly all effort that would have gone to sagenb has gone in those > > directions - and I'm not criticizing those projects, just recognizing

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:57 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> > Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end >> > of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't >> > have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out >> > of github, and u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

> > > Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end > > of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't > > have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out > > of github, and until we feel that we have an API and model we re

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Volker Braun wrote: > > I think the mirroring is currently broken either due to the website > relayout or the boxen move. > Things seem to be back in order now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Fernando Perez wrote: Yup, we're a little behind... :)  Trying to get 3.0 out before the end of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out of github, and until we feel that we h

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out of github, and until we feel that we have an API and model we really like, it will lik

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Is the first release out yet? In August you said it would be October/November... On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:02:29 PM UTC+1, Fernando Perez wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Volker Braun > wrote: > >> Currently it is single user only. > > > the multiuser support is a separate

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Currently it is single user only. the multiuser support is a separate project that wraps the single user component: https://github.com/jupyter/jupyterhub Single-user application and multiuser authentication/management are not bundled into

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Currently it is single user only. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:20:57 PM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > I got ipython to run. Looks nice. > > How is account management done with it? Ldap integration? > > -- > Jori Mäntysalo > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

I got ipython to run. Looks nice. How is account management done with it? Ldap integration? -- Jori Mäntysalo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sag

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

I think the mirroring is currently broken either due to the website relayout or the boxen move. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:42:58 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Workaround is to run > > > > sage -f zeromqsage -f pyzmq > > sage -f ipyt

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Workaround is to run sage -f zeromqsage -f pyzmq sage -f ipython [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer I.e. sagemath.org stalled. Mirrors of those somewhere? -- Jori Mäntysalo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Ok, its a dependency bug: http://trac.sagemath.org/17202 Workaround is to run sage -f zeromq sage -f pyzmq sage -f ipython On Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:55:23 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. I did not. But no help from that: running configure Configure: Autodetecting ZMQ settings... Custom ZMQ dir: /home/jm58660/sage/l

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" > > It s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" It said that pyzmq is missing. Then sage -i pyzmq said that zmq.h was not found. (And last "yum whatprovides 'zmq.h'" found no matches...). A bug in pyzmq? (Might be, again, something wrong with m

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On 22 October 2014 17:12, Volker Braun wrote: > Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" Thanks! John > > > On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:55:19 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: >> >> I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this >> "ipython notenook" and is it part

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know what is the new line which is equivalent to > > %load_ext sage.misc.sage_extension >> > > with sage 6.2? > %load_ext sage should now work. > > The ticket #16050 (I think...) moved some code so... > >