> > > Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end > > of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't > > have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out > > of github, and until we feel that we have an API and model we really > > like, it will likely continue that way. > > So, for an Sage server admin this means that there is no horry to look at > IPython yet? And on the other hand, IPython will come, and there is no > meaning to make big enhancements to sagenb? > > I think the lack of progress on sagenb is much more due to the *simultaneous* existence of the (for now, beta) Jupyter and SMC projects. Nearly all effort that would have gone to sagenb has gone in those directions - and I'm not criticizing those projects, just recognizing reality.
> For now sagenb works quite well for user viewpoint. As an admin I see > missing features, like really deleting a given user include data, and > deleting accounts that have no local password and ldap does not found use > anymore. Also main page for documentation on sagemath.org does not > contain > "Admin's Guide" parallel to "Developer's Guide". > > Please do open issues at the sagenb github site, that would be quite helpful. Also, it's really interesting to me how many admins have these truly amazing fixes that they haven't shared with the rest of the community because sagenb development has been moribund. A few of us are trying to fix that, though. - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
