Re: [sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

2024-03-22 Thread 'Gonzalo Tornaría' via sage-devel
Thanks David, It would be interesting to add nominations that were banned into the analysis. For all we know, somebody could have received 16/17 votes if they were in the ballot, but a single negative vote was enough to prevent that. Could you add anonymized information about nominations that d

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

2024-03-21 Thread kcrisman
The anonymized votes are here , in case anyone wants to do further analysis. Thanks, David. This actually confirms that, as such elections go, it's remarkably non-controversial; a third (!

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

2024-03-20 Thread David Roe
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:10 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It's very important to note that with multiwinner approval voting, merely > counting the votes per candidate and picking the top ones can lead to > rather unfair results > (unlike in the single winner case). > > For instance, if we elect k=