The anonymized votes are here <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12kbJepIKLpLKwLDum70FsSkqTto2St5gbspf3DyrPIc/edit?usp=sharing>, in case anyone wants to do further analysis.
Thanks, David. This actually confirms that, as such elections go, it's remarkably non-controversial; a third (!) of the electorate approved everybody, and only one candidate got less than 2/3 (approval) votes. And nearly everyone used more than half their potential votes. There is a small C/D vs. E/F(/G, and certainly not uniformly anyway) bloc difference in a third of the voters, but that's not spectacular at all. (If you would like actual harmonic analysis of more subtle potential coalitions, it will, alas, have to wait until well after the end of the semester - and anything else would probably be well within tolerations of randomness on a suitable probability distribution.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/cdc5150f-6e36-4d83-9590-3a1def6bb27dn%40googlegroups.com.
