Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-21 Thread Joseph Hundley
I found all the old cpp stuff I had and put it at https://sourceforge.net/projects/egut/files/oldCppStuff.tar.gz/download It's less than I thought. Either I've lost some files or just didn't remember correctly the stage the project was at when my former student convinced me we ought to switch o

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph Hundley
Aah. Well, some of this stuff was actually written in C++ and then rewritten in Java. It might make more sense to just look for the old C++ implementation instead. On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 3:11:36 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > >> >> It's not clear that this desire to do s

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-11 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> > >>> It's not clear that this desire to do something general is that well >>> grounded in practical applications. In my old java project I implemented >>> only the five simply connected exceptional groups and mostly got by just >>> fine. Still, that was the idea. I noticed that reductive Ka

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-09 Thread Joseph Hundley
On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 3:43:27 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > Hey Joe, >Sorry for the delayed response (I've been traveling the past few days). >> >> >> Sorry for posting and then disappearing for a bit. Thanks for your >> answers. I will be very happy to have your help with th

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 9:00:19 PM UTC, Joseph Hundley wrote: > > Hi Travis and David, > > Sorry for posting and then disappearing for a bit. Thanks for your > answers. I will be very happy to have your help with the project to the > extent that you have time, and even just any quick

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-08 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Joe, Sorry for the delayed response (I've been traveling the past few days). > > > Sorry for posting and then disappearing for a bit. Thanks for your > answers. I will be very happy to have your help with the project to the > extent that you have time, and even just any quick suggestions a

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-04 Thread Joseph Hundley
Hi Travis and David, Sorry for posting and then disappearing for a bit. Thanks for your answers. I will be very happy to have your help with the project to the extent that you have time, and even just any quick suggestions and advice. My thinking was to do something that would cover arbitrary

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2016-12-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Joseph, There is currently a fair amount implemented with root systems: sage: Phi = RootSystem(['A',2]) sage: P = Phi.root_lattice() sage: Q = Phi.root_lattice() sage: P = Phi.weight_lattice() sage: al = Q.simple_roots() sage: al[1] alpha[1] sage: al[1].weyl_action([1,2,1]) -alpha[2] sage:

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2016-12-13 Thread David Roe
I'm interested in helping out with this project. Julian RĂ¼th, Xavier Caruso and I are working on p-adics on the Sage IRC channel ( http://www.sagemath.org/help-irc.html) at 4pm EST (10pm CET) today. If you want to log in and chat about character lattices for a bit I'd be happy to share ideas. I'

[sage-devel] group algebra modules

2016-12-13 Thread Joseph Hundley
I'm playing around with implementing Based Root Data, with an eye towards eventually implementing groups attached to them. So, I need to instantiate the character and cocharacter lattices; they need to be free Z-modules with an action of the relevant Weyl group. In other words they are Z[W]-mod