Aah. Well, some of this stuff was actually written in C++ and then rewritten in Java. It might make more sense to just look for the old C++ implementation instead.
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 3:11:36 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > >> >> >>>> It's not clear that this desire to do something general is that well >>>> grounded in practical applications. In my old java project I implemented >>>> only the five simply connected exceptional groups and mostly got by just >>>> fine. Still, that was the idea. I noticed that reductive Kac-Moody groups >>>> have a similar classification (and presentations) with root data. >>>> >>> >>> Somewhat of a side question, but how much of your java code do you think >>> is portable to Sage (or C++ that we can create bindings to with Cython)? >>> >> >> Not sure. Actually, at risk of exposing my ignorance, let me just admit >> that I'm not sure what "portable" means here. >> >> > I guess my question is do you use any special Java functionality or > packages? It might just be something we can rewrite in C++ by making some > minor changes to the syntax and semantics. From there, we can make it into > a small optional Sage spkg to get some functionality in Sage quickly. > > Best, > Travis > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
