> > >>> It's not clear that this desire to do something general is that well >>> grounded in practical applications. In my old java project I implemented >>> only the five simply connected exceptional groups and mostly got by just >>> fine. Still, that was the idea. I noticed that reductive Kac-Moody groups >>> have a similar classification (and presentations) with root data. >>> >> >> Somewhat of a side question, but how much of your java code do you think >> is portable to Sage (or C++ that we can create bindings to with Cython)? >> > > Not sure. Actually, at risk of exposing my ignorance, let me just admit > that I'm not sure what "portable" means here. > > I guess my question is do you use any special Java functionality or packages? It might just be something we can rewrite in C++ by making some minor changes to the syntax and semantics. From there, we can make it into a small optional Sage spkg to get some functionality in Sage quickly.
Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
