I forgot a minor remark.
On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
> wrote:
> > My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one
> > remove the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
> >
Hi Dima,
On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
> wrote:
> Certainly we can make that function more general, and test for the
> strongly regular needs elsewhere.
That would be nice.
> (although functions with names star
Hi Ferdinand,
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
wrote:
>
> My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one remove
> the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
> graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py? These graphs are nice for general
>
Dear Sage Developers,
My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one remove
the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py? These graphs are nice for
general q, see [1] or [2].
My current hack is to change
if m %
