Hi Dima, On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer > <ferdinand.ihrin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Certainly we can make that function more general, and test for the > strongly regular needs elsewhere.
That would be nice. > (although functions with names starting from _ are not meant for general > use...) I only edited classical_geometries.py as it was the quickest solution for me. I do not assume that I am meant to edit anything in that file. ;-) For q odd, just replacing the hard coded point_type by some equivalent of the GAP code Difference(List(Elements(GF(q)), x -> x^2), [0 * Z(q)]), respectively, Difference(Elements(GF(q)), List(Elements(GF(q)), x -> x^2)) should suffice. For q even, it is similar with the trace, but I cannot write down GAP code for it without some effort. > If you can open a trac ticket for this, please do and CC me on this Done. I CCed you in it. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29459 > (incidentally I am working on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26513 > right now - and appear to have a fix :-)) Nice! Best, Ferdinand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/1587251.WigJy6oaBf%40grosserwald.
