I forgot a minor remark. On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer > <ferdinand.ihrin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one > > remove the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in > > graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py? These graphs are nice for > > general q, see [1] or [2]. > IIRC this restriction is due to these graphs not being strongly > regular for the other values of q.
For m odd and q = 3, you also get SRGs. The SRGs are isomorphic to the perp=False case (maybe the complement graph of the perp=False case, do not recall). Best, Ferdinand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/1723287.Jc8WpS11KJ%40grosserwald.
