[sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3

https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37840 is handling the problem, I guess. On Sunday, April 28, 2024 at 8:56:36 AM UTC+9 Henri Girard wrote: > I still have this message on ubuntu 24.04 but it compiles fine in wsl2 > (sage 1.4. beta4) > > Any help ? In between I use sage conda 10.2.0 because

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3

I still have this message on ubuntu 24.04 but it compiles fine in wsl2 (sage 1.4. beta4) Any help ? In between I use sage conda 10.2.0 because I can't build sage dev Le 19/04/2024 à 05:18, Henri Girard a écrit : Sorry I forget error message r /home/pi/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.1

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3

Sorry I forget error message r /home/pi/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.12/var/lib/sage/scripts/cypari/spkg-requirements.txt (line 1)) [cypari-2.1.5] [spkg-pipinst] Requirement already satisfied: cysignals>=1.7 in /home/pi/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packa

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3

On Sunday, April 14, 2024 at 2:39:35 AM UTC+9 henri girard wrote: Build with manjaro ryzen 9 9700x Thanks for the report. First time to hear of Majaro distro :-) Very easy ! Good. I feel that sagemath betas are very stable these days. -- You received this message because you are subscrib

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath/sage] Restructure `sage.*.all` for modularization, replace relative by absolute imports (PR #36676)

Please whoever is not blocked by the author of this PR, record my -1 vote on this. Yes, this vote has a political element in it. You want to play politics - let us play it. Dima On 10 April 2024 02:40:40 CEST, Tobias Diez wrote: >@tobiasdiez requested your review on: sagemath/sage#36676 Restru

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath GSoC 2024

Thanks, Travis, for sharing this great news here. One recent change in the GSoC program, perhaps important for the Sage project, may have been overlooked in the past. GSoC is open not just to "students" but also to "open source beginners" -- without any age limit or any restriction regarding th

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 10.1 for macOs ARM randomly fails to compute the Riemann/Ricci tensor or Ricci scalar when using threads

Hi, Le lundi 2 octobre 2023 à 13:42:29 UTC+2, Alejandro Marino Vaquero Avilés-Casco a écrit : When running sagemath release version 10.1 in macOs for the arm architecture (the target tested has a M2 processor) with multiple threads, the calculation of the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor or t

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

I checked the dockerfile (with 10.0 and replacing noteobook by jupyterlab) and besides some missing icons it works. It is nice to have several alternatives. In conda I could add optional packages; is it possible with this new dockerfile? Thanks, Enrique. El jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2022 a las

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:59 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Well, I'll try if I can trigger version 10.0. I also noticed there are two >> webhooks in the github repo. Not sure what to do, I'll leave it as it is >> for now. >> > > What webhooks? > > So, anyone who has access to the github repo settin

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, 10:56 Harald Schilly, wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:51 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> OK, but we probably should not be running this on "all" releases, only >> on the missing on Zenodo ones. >> Also, it's you who has to run this script, most probably I can't (as >>

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:51 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > OK, but we probably should not be running this on "all" releases, only > on the missing on Zenodo ones. > Also, it's you who has to run this script, most probably I can't (as > it's somehow "owned" by you). > Well, I'll try if I can trigge

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

Hi Harald, On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 9:09 AM Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hi, I was indeed the one who set this up, but I vaguely remember someone else > added files to the sources back then. files are a different story, no files will do anything if the integration is off, I suppose. > > In any cas

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] sorry state of Zenodo integration

Hi, I was indeed the one who set this up, but I vaguely remember someone else added files to the sources back then. In any case, I accessed zenodo and removed the link with zenodo from the archived version, and added the sagemath/sage repository. Let's see what happens, i.e. it says it is "syncin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

Hi, I am sorry that I could not get back to you sooner. Thanks for reminding me the problems of WSL and the vintage of my machine. Best regards, phi On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 11:56:06 AM UTC-5 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 8:10 AM being nobody00 > wrote: > > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

Hi, I am sorry that I could not get back to you sooner. Thank you so much for the advice, I will try it out and report back. Best regards, phi On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 4:46:26 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/cdefs.h:453:10: fatal error: > scipy/_lib

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/cdefs.h:453:10: fatal error: scipy/_lib/_uarray/_uarray.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so.p/bits/long-double.h: Invalid argument These are sporadic system call errors that are known to happen on WSL. See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31088 Just restarting th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 8:10 AM being nobody00 wrote: > > > What OS? > $ uname -a > Linux PC1 4.4.0-17763-Microsoft #2268-Microsoft Thu Oct 07 16:36:00 PST 2021 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > this is a guest OS of WSL, as far as I know, and very old one (4+ y.o., and unsupported since early

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

> What OS? $ uname -a Linux PC1 4.4.0-17763-Microsoft #2268-Microsoft Thu Oct 07 16:36:00 PST 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Please find appended below excerpts from 'config.log' and 'scipy-1.9.2.log'. Maybe this is newly introduced after https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34658? FWIW, beta 4

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8 beta 4: Error building a wheel for scipy-1.9.2

What OS? I'm guessing Mac OS, in which case you need the fix at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34658, or build 9.8.beta3 or wait for a later beta release that includes the fix. -- John On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 12:40:30 PM UTC-8 beingn...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear SageMath, > > scip

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8.b3 - Error building Sage. package: jupyter_jsmol-2022.1.0

> What is the installed version of wheel according to "./sage -pip list"? ~/sage-9.8/b3.0$ ./sage -pip list | grep 'wheel' wheel 0.37.1 On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 1:51:54 AM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > What is the installed version of wheel according to "./sage

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.8.b3 - Error building Sage. package: jupyter_jsmol-2022.1.0

What is the installed version of wheel according to "./sage -pip list"? On Friday, November 18, 2022 at 9:00:06 PM UTC-8 beingn...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear All, > > Please find 'config.log' and 'jupyter_jsmol-2022.1.0.log' in the attached > 'report.b3.7z' > > Your help is much appreciated. > > Be

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

There is also a working solution with conda (see the environment.yml file in https://github.com/sagemath/sage-binder-env ) El jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2022 a las 10:44:16 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon escribió: > PS: I confirm that your solutio

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

PS: I confirm that your solution works for the notebooks of https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples.html The start up is quite long, but if one is patient enough, it works! Le jeudi 17 novembre 2022 à 09:41:11 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi, > Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:41 UTC+

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

Hi, Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:41 UTC+1, de...@benjamin-hackl.at a écrit : > Hey all, > > I really liked the way of making code accessible via a repository or gist > containing a bunch of notebooks together with a simple Dockerfile that has > not much more than "FROM sagemath/sagemath

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: time to update the trac server - use a git mirror for now

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, 11:09 Frédéric Chapoton, wrote: > I have contacted Erik Bray and would prefer to wait until he can answer. I > have also contacted Ralk Hemmecke, who knows gitolite. > > I am afraid that the rollback would also mean to roll back the full git > repo, which seems like an awful

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.7.beta3: hecke_series takes forever

Vincent Delecroix, sorry. Guillermo On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 03:56, davida...@gmail.com wrote: > This is now #34025 . > > David A. > > Le dimanche 19 juin 2022 à 17:38:55 UTC-4, GMS a écrit : > >> >> As suggested by Vincent Delecrois, this is due to #33876.

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.7.beta3: hecke_series takes forever

This is now #34025 . David A. Le dimanche 19 juin 2022 à 17:38:55 UTC-4, GMS a écrit : > > As suggested by Vincent Delecrois, this is due to #33876. David Ayotte is > taking care of it. > > Guillermo > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 at 22:46, G. M.-S. wrote: > >

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.7.beta3: hecke_series takes forever

As suggested by Vincent Delecrois, this is due to #33876. David Ayotte is taking care of it. Guillermo On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 at 22:46, G. M.-S. wrote: > > After waiting for more than an hour of CPU time (1 core at 100%), here are > the results of interrupting. > > *macOS 11.6.7* (Big Sur) with Xc

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 9.7.beta3: hecke_series takes forever

After waiting for more than an hour of CPU time (1 core at 100%), here are the results of interrupting. *macOS 11.6.7* (Big Sur) with Xcode 13.2.1: $ ./sage ┌┐ │ SageMath version 9.7.beta3, Release Date: 2022-06-19

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath and VScode

Hi, > VS code cannot debug python code that is executed by a shell script. It looks like he has set the expectation too high. > My strategy usually is to create a new (temporary) python file that contains the code I want to debug (or calls the method I want to debug), and then use the python deb

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath and VScode

VS code cannot debug python code that is executed by a shell script. You have to execute python code directly in order to debug it. My strategy usually is to create a new (temporary) python file that contains the code I want to debug (or calls the method I want to debug), and then use the pytho

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath and VScode

See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30484 - help is welcome in writing instructions for our documentation On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 1:33:14 AM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear All, > > There was a related discussion here: > > https://ask.sagemath.org/question/43240/sagemath-and-vsco

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath version 9.6.rc0 [Makefile:246: testalllong] Error 17

Hi, > make pytest Thank you for the info, that will be tried when RC1 comes out BTW, these tests are great features of this release, 9.6. Thank you, sage team. Regards, phiho On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:16:28 AM UTC-4 adarsh.k...@gmail.com wrote: > I had a similar problem with Sage v

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath version 9.6.rc0 [Makefile:246: testalllong] Error 17

I had a similar problem with Sage v9.6.beta4 on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/ZYaVBloUbF0) in that PyTest was not detected by Sage. I found that running ``` ./sage -i pytest ``` solves the problem. However, based on another conversation it was pointed out that runnin

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath Accepted as GSoC 2022 Mentor Organization

Sorry for the delayed reply. Thank you for letting me know about that. I have sent a message to the moderators asking to post a message there. Best, Travis On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 8:05:46 PM UTC+9 enriqu...@gmail.com wrote: > Today I received a message from EAGER mail list (algebraic geome

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath Accepted as GSoC 2022 Mentor Organization

Today I received a message from EAGER mail list (algebraic geometry events) a message about a GeomScale organization being accepted as a mentoring organization for the 2022 Google Summer of Code and looking for candidates. Would it be useful if Travis or someone else would send a message to this

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath Accepted as GSoC 2022 Mentor Organization

Wonderful! Thanks for serving as the org admin again this year! On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:03:20 PM UTC-8 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > Hi everyone, >Great news. SageMath has been accepted this year as a mentor > organization. I will start the preparations for the next stages. > > Best, > Tra

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath in The Calabi-Yau Landscape

Hi, Le samedi 26 février 2022 à 02:09:04 UTC+1, hohoa...@gmail.com a écrit : > Dear List, > > Sagemath occupies a whole section (Appendix E) in "The Calabi-Yau > Landscape: from Geometry, to Physics, to Machine-Learning" by Yang-Hui He: > > https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02893 > > Does Sagemath Sage

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 9.6 beta1 jupyter notebook missing output

Hi, Sage behavior seems to be different on the console: ~/sage-9.6/b01$ ./sage ┌┐ │ SageMath version 9.6.beta1, Release Date: 2022-02-13 │ │ Using Python 3.8.10. Type "help()" for help. │ └

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 9.6 beta1 jupyter notebook missing output

Hi, Le samedi 19 février 2022 à 03:28:03 UTC+1, hohoa...@gmail.com a écrit : > > >1. In [3] only gives A^4 in Out [3] (missing A^0, A^1, A^2 and A^3) >2. In [4] gives no output (but In [8] does) >3. In [6] gives no output (but In [7] does) > > There is no bug in all this. To display

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath and xrdp - Environment Variable error

This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30888 On Thursday, December 17, 2020 at 12:13:01 PM UTC-8 Tyler Spilker wrote: > I have managed to get it working by putting a symbolic link to > /usr/share/sagemath/bin/sage-env to /bin/sage-env > > It looks like the environment variables aren't picked u

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath and xrdp - Environment Variable error

I have managed to get it working by putting a symbolic link to /usr/share/sagemath/bin/sage-env to /bin/sage-env It looks like the environment variables aren't picked up correctly for the xrdp session and I don't understand their relationship well enough to figure it out On Thursday, December

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath Anaconda and Python 3.8

2020-10-07 18:22:31 UTC, Zachary Scherr: > > You should probably follow the directions here: > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html > > and install sage into its own environment so that it correctly installs > all the dependencies. Sage 9.2 will support python 3.8. > Also d

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath Anaconda and Python 3.8

You should probably follow the directions here: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html and install sage into its own environment so that it correctly installs all the dependencies. Sage 9.2 will support python 3.8. On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 2:18:27 PM UTC-4 asv...@gmai

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 9.0 for MacOS is not linked with SSL

Would you like to put one of the option in Homebrew? On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 5:27 AM Nathan Dunfield wrote: > Unfortunately, no recent SageMath binary for macOS comes with a working > SSL lib. Two fixes: > > 1) Download "mac_sage9.tgz" from > > https://bitbucket.org/t3m/snappy/downloads/ > > unpac

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 9.0 for MacOS is not linked with SSL

Unfortunately, no recent SageMath binary for macOS comes with a working SSL lib. Two fixes: 1) Download "mac_sage9.tgz" from https://bitbucket.org/t3m/snappy/downloads/ unpack, and follow the instructions. 2) Assuming you have the XCode command line tools installed, the following usually wo

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath part of GSoC 2020

Congratulations yet again! On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 8:47:41 AM UTC-5, Harald Schilly wrote: > > SageMath was selected to be part of Google Summer of Code 2020. > > wiki: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2020 > > gsoc: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/4553430409936896/ > > tim

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 10:25:07 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi John, > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:08 PM John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > > I have compiled it without any problems. You should not be using gcc > from homebrew, but rather the version of gcc installed by Xcode or

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

If I am allowed to quote classics here: Quo usque tandem abutere, Catalina, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? Quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit audacia? O tempora, o mores! On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:24 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi John, > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

Hi John, On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:08 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > > I have compiled it without any problems. You should not be using gcc from > homebrew, but rather the version of gcc installed by Xcode or its > command-line tools. That might help. (You should install the homebrew gcc > packag

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 8.9 is not complied on macOS Catalina with python3

I have compiled it without any problems. You should not be using gcc from homebrew, but rather the version of gcc installed by Xcode or its command-line tools. That might help. (You should install the homebrew gcc package to get gfortran, but at least for me, installing homebrew's gcc installed

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath for Windows download counts via GitHub

> Good luck on trying to count "users" instead of copies. > RJF > > >> True that. Though I think it is interesting that in practice we get many contacts from people who do *not* download new versions very often, so there is at least some vague connection between downloads and users (as oppose

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath for Windows download counts via GitHub

Just curious -- if sourceforge says there are 65,766 downloads of Maxima 5.42.2 (say) for Windows, does that mean there are really another 4139 downloads of (some version of) Maxima that are not counted because they were downloaded from SageMath? I assume Maxima downloads for linux are undercoun

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath Conway polynomials error from Conda Forge

I coincidentally found the very same issue recently. The issue appeared to be that the newest version of conda (4.6.x) was more specific in checking versions than the older release, such that sagemath-conway-polynomials 0.5.p0 (version 0.5, patchlevel 0) was thought to be a prerelease version

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

Fri 2019-01-18 17:00:50 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon: > > Btw, I've noticed that LIP6 does no longer appear (nor any French mirror...) > in the list of mirrors for binaries: > http://www.sagemath.org/download.html > I think it was in the list some time ago... Yes, Harald just removed the LIP6 mirror f

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

Le vendredi 18 janvier 2019 16:23:23 UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : > > I just wrote to the maintainers of the SageMath download mirror > at LIP6, Paris. > Btw, I've noticed that LIP6 does no longer appear (nor any French mirror...) in the list of mirrors for binaries: http://www.sagemath.or

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

Hi, It turns out that 3 package source tarballs have incorrect checksums on www-ftp.lip6.fr: ipython_genutils-0.2.0.tar.gz jinja2-2.10.tar.gz ipython-5.8.0.tar.gz Copying to SAGE_ROOT/upstream tarballs downloaded from another mirror (mirror.koddos.net) for these three ones (only) lead to a

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

I just wrote to the maintainers of the SageMath download mirror at LIP6, Paris. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Bad source tarballs for ipython-5.8.0 on some mirrors

That's definitely weird. The master is files.sagemath.org, and it's website says ipython-5.8.0.tar.gz torrent 4.75 MB 2018-09-29 15:52 MD5: 7014b8824981eef2cb893ea5398d6b8d and sha1: 987b66cc662db8bd2ae96eee2f2237266d0c92dc So, that's correct. Must be the faul of that mirror. My contact email fr

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac down?

I'm able to ssh to it now (it didn't work 15 min ago), and also was able to pull from git to the github mirror. And the www interface is back on, too. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:51 PM Erik Bray wrote: > > I'm on it. > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > Is it just me, o

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac down?

I restarted apache and postgres and it seems fine for now, but from the log it looks like the site was being scraped by something that wasn't obeying robots.txt and thus effectively DoS-ing us. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:51 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > I'm on it. > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dima

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac down?

I'm on it. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Is it just me, or it's really down, and should be rebooted? > > Dima > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sagemath-admins" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and sto

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 7:43:14 PM UTC-4, Julian Rüth wrote: > > Thanks for reporting this and even providing a workaround :) > > You are right, Sage was built with libssl-dev but the final container had > been missing openssl. I fixed it for the 8.2 build and pushed a new image > to the Doc

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

Thanks for reporting this and even providing a workaround :) You are right, Sage was built with libssl-dev but the final container had been missing openssl. I fixed it for the 8.2 build and pushed a new image to the Docker Hub. julian On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 10:06:54 PM UTC+2, Nathan Dun

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

*ping* Julian who built the 8.2 docker image... On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Nathan Dunfield wrote: >> In the interim, could you try to install OpenSSL and its development files >> a,d reinstall Sage's pip ? > > > Actually, I fixed the problem simply by installing the (non-development) > Ubun

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

> > In the interim, could you try to install OpenSSL and its development files > a,d reinstall Sage's pip ? > Actually, I fixed the problem simply by installing the (non-development) Ubuntu package "openssl". In particular, I did not need to reinstall or rebuild any part of Sage itself. I'm

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 8.2 Docker image: pip lacks SSL support

I have met this problem, which occurs when OpenSSL isn't available systemwide (there is a saga somewhere in sage-devel's archive, around spring 2017 IIRC...). I have personally checked that Sage's pip is (or was, at the time) unable to use SSL when compiled against Gnu TLS alone... This should

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Trac downtime for upgrades

When it is down will it say why it is down? On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:47 AM Erik Bray wrote: > Hi all, > > I have some long overdue updates for Sage's Trac that I've been > putting off deploying for several months, for various reasons. > However, I believe it *is* ready to deploy. > > This upgra

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath 8.2.beta7: issue compiling cbc

After distclean, it's now compiling. Thanks, David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath 8.2.beta7: issue compiling cbc

On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 4:51:55 PM UTC, David Coudert wrote: > > I have a compilation error with package cbc-2.9.4 during the compilation > of SageMath version 8.2.beta7 (make -j1). > System: macbook air OS X Yosemite > > cbc was already installed and working with previous version of Sagem

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath problems

Yes, can someone please look into this? zulip hasn't worked in a few days now. John On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 11:51:39 PM UTC-8, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Hello, > processing of ticket actions is quite slow and zulip.sagemath.org gives a > 502, both since at least yesterday. Can someone p

[sage-devel] Re: "SageMath will replace Maple"

I assume that they decided there was not enough use of Maple to justify the expense of the license in CSC. The sentence indicating that Sage will "replace" Maple is probably a simplification of something like ... "Those (few?) current users of Maple on our computer system may find that Sage [Sa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:38 PM, John Cremona wrote: > On 26 October 2017 at 11:18, Erik Bray wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly >> wrote: >>> Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed >>> out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torren

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sagemath mirrors security issues

On 26 October 2017 at 11:18, Erik Bray wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly > wrote: >> Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed >> out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here >> http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sagemath mirrors security issues

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed > out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here > http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have checksums and what would be > missing is to sign them.

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath mirrors security issues

Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have checksums and what would be missing is to sign them. AFAIK there is no official public/private key for files on s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 2:25:34 PM UTC+1, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > P.s. in case this helps others from making the same mistake as me: don't > click the branch link on https://github.com/dimpase/sagetrac-mirror/ in > order to see if all branches are there unless you have a decent sys

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

P.s. in case this helps others from making the same mistake as me: don't click the branch link on https://github.com/dimpase/sagetrac-mirror/ in order to see if all branches are there unless you have a decent system with some ram to spare. On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 14:18:46 UTC+2, Dima Pase

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

PS. it's set up using --mirror option of git clone and git push, so it should actually be suitable for running anything (bots too) that only needs read access to the repo. In detail, on my desktop I did git clone --bare g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git cd sage.git/ git push --mirror g...@github.co

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

It is a snapshot, not constantly updated. But it does contain all the branches present in the original repo. We can look into setting up a constant updating, it should not be too hard, and would take off load from trac, too. Dima On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > Am

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

Am 2017-09-12 um 13:58 schrieb 'Martin R' via sage-devel: > It worked for me after I rebooted my laptop (in Vienna, Austria). I guess > it's > a coincidence, but who knows... a reboot did not help me (Klagenfurt, Austria). Clemens > > Martin > > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017 13:26:03 UTC+2

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

It worked for me after I rebooted my laptop (in Vienna, Austria). I guess it's a coincidence, but who knows... Martin Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017 13:26:03 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > > I've created a trac mirror repo on github: > https://github.com/dimpase/sagetrac-mirror > Please pul

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

Am 2017-09-12 um 13:26 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: > I've created a trac mirror repo on github: > https://github.com/dimpase/sagetrac-mirror > Please pull from there, if you have problems with trac's git. do I understand correctly that this is a snapshot (as indicated on that page: 2017-09-12 12:15 UK

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] git trac connection problems from continental Europe

I've created a trac mirror repo on github: https://github.com/dimpase/sagetrac-mirror Please pull from there, if you have problems with trac's git. Cheers, Dima On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Reported on sage-devel. > But works for me at UK... > > -- > > --- > You rec

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] CDN's mathjax will go by the end of the month

On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 11:10:44 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Harald Schilly > > Date: Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:06 PM > Subject: Re: [sagemath-admins] CDN's mathjax will go by the end of the > month > To: sagemath-admins > > > > I'l

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] Fwd: documentation: activate button?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Luca De Feo wrote: > The "activate" button DOES appear in local installations, if they are > served by the local HTTP server (through the jupyter notebook). Try > it, it's cool. ... well, ok. but what about using the sage cell server for all this? is there an obst

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath PPA

Hi Thanks. I've just uploaded 7.5.1 to https://launchpad.net/~aims/+ archive/ubuntu/sagemath-dev/+packages Note it is the sagemath-dev repo not the sagemath repo. Would you be willing to test it? Regards, Jan On 4 February 2017 at 21:07, Antonio Valdés Morales wrote: > Dear Jan, > First of al

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] http://macappstore.org/sage/ ?

I've no idea, but searching for this tool took me to https://github.com/caskroom/homebrew-cask/blob/master/Casks/sage.rb looking at blame/log reveals some names … -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no > promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about 50GB > iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds. The new machine has 8TB of hard disks in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about 50GB iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds. Whats the plan for external networking and secrets? On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 9:57:43 P

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> we can't, because there are filesize limits. >> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use) > > I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> we can't, because there are filesize limits. > how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use) I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem with using a commercial one is that the traffic is so expensive.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote: >> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should >> just switch to GitHub. > > we can't, because there are filesize limits. how about git-lfs ? (which is probably

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote: > no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should > just switch to GitHub. we can't, because there are filesize limits. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" gr

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org are down... >> >> I've done what I can and right now >> >>- files.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org >>> are down... > > I've done what I can and right now > >- files.sagemath.org >- rsync.sagemath.o

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect >> firewall rule? >> > > It was William, I suppose. > Actually, disabling

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org >> are down... I've done what I can and right now - files.sagemath.org - rsync.sagemath.org seem to respond to pings. And - build.sagemath.org doesn'

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:24 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org >> are down... >> > > I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today). It turns out the UPS is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org > are down... > I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today). William > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: >> >> Di

  1   2   3   >