On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:01 AM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:24 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm actually pretty curious about how pexpect and XMLRPC both
> > done locally compare speedwise. I've done some simple benchmarks
>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:24 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm actually pretty curious about how pexpect and XMLRPC both
> done locally compare speedwise. I've done some simple benchmarks
> below. The short answer is that pexpect is between several hundred
> to several thous
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:13 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:3
On Feb 23, 11:59 pm, "alex clemesha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, thanks for doing those benchmarks,
> they are pretty interesting to see!
>
> I want to stress that I think that this API discussion
> should really *not* have anything to do with speed,
> and this is precisely because of
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:0
Hello,
I am limiting myself to less than one email per day in this thread :)
On Feb 23, 2:58 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, though I'm not sure, that mabshoff has perhaps misunderstood
> my points, probably because my post was too long, for which I
> apologize. As I said, t
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:02 AM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:02 AM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In Knoboo we *decouple* the idea of a kernel
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:02 AM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In Knoboo we *decouple* the idea of a kernel, it could be another
> > Python (Sage) process, with communication through Pexpect
> >
> > ..
I think, though I'm not sure, that mabshoff has perhaps misunderstood
my points, probably because my post was too long, for which I
apologize. As I said, this post was very much in the conciliatory
spirit of Jason Grout's original one. In particular, I was
emphatically not addressing any of the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Knoboo we *decouple* the idea of a kernel, it could be another
> Python (Sage) process, with communication through Pexpect
>
> ... but it also couple be another Python (Sage) process running a very
> minimal XML-RPC ser
On Feb 23, 3:38 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Du to lack of time and need for sleep I will only touch a couple
issue.
> Great thanks are due to Jason G. for starting to distill some of the
> issues involved in the developments leading to sage-edu in a very
> gracious manner. I h
Great thanks are due to Jason G. for starting to distill some of the
issues involved in the developments leading to sage-edu in a very
gracious manner. I hope to add, in a similar vein (nothing about APIs,
sorry!), more commentary on some more of the underlying issues, and a
request to the "main d
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, this discussion blew up way to fast for me to keep on top of it
> and
> > form a coherent opinion. Ted, I'm specifically CCing you
Thanks, Jason, for the lengthy reply. I think it summarizes things
nicely.
I started a simple API at the AMS meeting in January, and I think the
time is ripe to have a discussion about this. I'll start a new thread
summarizing my ideas (probably on sage-edu) when I have a bit more
time (p
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow, this discussion blew up way to fast for me to keep on top of it and
> form a coherent opinion. Ted, I'm specifically CCing you; if you don't
> want to reply (either on or off list), I understand. Personally, I'd
16 matches
Mail list logo
