On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:29 PM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've run some Sage labs using the notebook here at UVM and two things
> have come up.
>
> (1) At the end of class, I asked my students to print out their work
> and turn it in. I stopped this almost immedi
Hello!
I've run some Sage labs using the notebook here at UVM and two things
have come up.
(1) At the end of class, I asked my students to print out their work
and turn it in. I stopped this almost immediately, since the
printouts are hugely wasteful: blank pages, things overrun the
margins, et
> Does it go away if you pass the "fragile" option to the frame
> environment? It seems that that is how people overcame this in the
> past. Can you look in the source to the slides that was posted previously?
>
> \begin{frame}[fragile]
Yes indeed, that works.
I remember the problem, now that y
gerhard wrote:
>> What problems are you having? Beamer and SageTeX are largely orthogonal,
>> but there are some tricky bits with verbatim environments
>
> When I add a sageblock in a frame, e.g.,
> \begin{sageblock}
> var('x')
> f = log(sin(x)/x)
> \end{sageblock}
>
> I get the error messa
> What problems are you having? Beamer and SageTeX are largely orthogonal,
> but there are some tricky bits with verbatim environments
When I add a sageblock in a frame, e.g.,
\begin{sageblock}
var('x')
f = log(sin(x)/x)
\end{sageblock}
I get the error message
Runaway argument?
! Paragraph
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 at 09:34AM -0700, gerhard wrote:
> PS: anybody got beamer with sagetex to work?
What problems are you having? Beamer and SageTeX are largely orthogonal,
but there are some tricky bits with verbatim environments, which are
covered in the documentation. If there are other proble
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Soroosh Yazdani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice if one had a way of checking the code of a procedure that
> is called inside of another function. Specifically, when you type
> M.myfunc??, sage prints out the source code, and in many cases, this code i
It would be nice if one had a way of checking the code of a procedure that
is called inside of another function. Specifically, when you type
M.myfunc??, sage prints out the source code, and in many cases, this code is
very generic, that calls another function, possibly after checking some
boundary
> PS: anybody got beamer with sagetex to work?
Yep. Franco Saliola posted some slides with the source of a talk he
gave awhile back:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_frm/thread/be12e21544158624/e3d60d77ef171168?lnk=gst&q=slides+first+sage+franco#e3d60d77ef171168
--Mike
--~--~
Hmm,
looks like everybody has all the features they want!
And yes, the notebook is REALLY NICE to have...
Seriously, though, I would like to
split a notebook into distinct pages
for easy presentation in talks and classes.
-gerhard
PS: anybody got beamer with sagetex to work?
--~--~-~
Now that's a really pure-mathematical suggestion!
John
2008/4/20 Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just a thought: if for some reason, the click event gets registered
> twice instead of once, one would go around a cycle of length 3 "the
> wrong way around". Perhaps change the cycle length a
Just a thought: if for some reason, the click event gets registered
twice instead of once, one would go around a cycle of length 3 "the
wrong way around". Perhaps change the cycle length and see how that
affects the bug?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
>
>
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > > For some reason, that cycle got reversed.
> >> >
> >> > Are you su
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > > For some reason, that cycle got reversed.
>> >
>> > Are you sure?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, that's exactly what happened for me - sometime ago the cycle was
>> wrap/u
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > For some reason, that cycle got reversed.
> >
> > Are you sure?
> >
>
> Yes, that's exactly what happened for me - sometime ago the cycle was
> wrap/unwrap/hide, and then it switched to wrap/hide/unwrap.
> > For some reason, that cycle got reversed.
>
> Are you sure?
>
Yes, that's exactly what happened for me - sometime ago the cycle was
wrap/unwrap/hide, and then it switched to wrap/hide/unwrap. Maybe it
is something paltform dependent?.. I am using Firefox from Windows and
it behaves in such a
I think the notebook is really nice.
On Apr 19, 9:47 am, gerhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, vis
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:56 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
> >
> > We already implemente
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
>
> We already implemented that two different ways. Both ways were too
> slow and/or inconsistent, so we disabled/r
>> For about 2/3 the things I personally want to output word wrap is
>> better, and for the other half, word wrap is worse.
>
>
>The above sentence is mathematically inconsistent because I had "half" at the
>beginning of the sentence, changed it to 2/3, but didn't change the
>other half to 1/3.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
>
> We already implemented that two different ways. Both ways were too
> slow and/
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
We already implemented that two different ways. Both ways were too
slow and/or inconsistent, so we disabled/removed the functionality. When
it comes to the notebook
How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
Also, I think that default line truncation can be improved: sometimes
even if a line fits my screen without horizontal scrolling it gets
truncated and I need to click on the output (twice) to make it look
better. Is it possible to determine the width o
23 matches
Mail list logo
