FWIW I think that nauty has been discussed enough that IF we were to
integrate it a bit more then it would certainly have passed the period to
become standard.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and st
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> some thoughts for inclusion:
>
> People working in combinatorial enumeration used to swear by nauty, there was
> no alternative, basically.
>
> It is a very solid plain C code, working on all sorts of platforms.
Excellent. I skimmed some
nauty is the classic in its field, just as PARI is in computational NT.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
some thoughts for inclusion:
People working in combinatorial enumeration used to swear by nauty, there was
no alternative, basically.
It is a very solid plain C code, working on all sorts of platforms.
It probably beats alternatives to graph isomorphism testing in Sage.(needs a
check)
It has
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 20:50, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> Good to go? I suppose we need a formal vote to make the package
>> standard, right?
>
>
> Of course. It's not clear to me that it should be standard, by the way...
Indeed -- there are questi
> Of course. It's not clear to me that it should be standard, by the way...
+1 of course.
By the way, I know that some doctests are flagged "optional - nauty"
out there, so we must fix that on the way.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-
On 2015-10-09 20:50, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Good to go? I suppose we need a formal vote to make the package
standard, right?
Of course. It's not clear to me that it should be standard, by the way...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group
On Friday, 9 October 2015 10:36:35 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 7:08:19 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>>
>> the copyright notice above very explicitly states that "all
>> rights reserved"
>
>
> As you said, thats a no-op:
> http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/allrights
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 7:08:19 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>>
>> the copyright notice above very explicitly states that "all
>> rights reserved"
>
>
> As you said, thats a no-op:
> http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/allrightsreserved/
>
>
On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 7:08:19 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> the copyright notice above very explicitly states that "all
> rights reserved"
As you said, thats a no-op:
http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/allrightsreserved/
The modified nauty-h.in does give permission to everything except
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 9 October 2015 07:44:55 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Looks great; The two restrictions
>>
>> * * You must not remove this section of the text, containing author
>> *
>> * attribution, copyright notice, and legal discl
On Friday, 9 October 2015 07:44:55 UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Looks great; The two restrictions
>
> * * You must not remove this section of the text, containing author
>*
> * attribution, copyright notice, and legal disclaimer.
> *
> * * You must clearly m
Looks great; The two restrictions
* * You must not remove this section of the text, containing author
*
* attribution, copyright notice, and legal disclaimer.
*
* * You must clearly mark modified versions of this software
*
* as differing from
13 matches
Mail list logo
