> > Just a question from the uninformed peanut gallery - under 2.10.3 in
> > the notebook, I get slightly different behavior for
> > view([f,x+var('y'),25*x^2])
> > and
> > show([f,x+var('y'),25*x^2])
> > where the show consistently seems to make all symbols the same size,
>
> First, these don't
On May 9, 1:24 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 3:25 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes
> > along these lines:
>
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145
>
> Just a question from th
On May 9, 3:25 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes
> along these lines:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145
>
Just a question from the uninformed peanut gallery - under 2.10.3 in
the notebook, I g
I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes
along these lines:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145
John
On May 7, 11:07 am, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The documentation for 'view' has one typo, and perhaps some other
> problems. Part o
On Wed, 07 May 2008 at 11:12AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should
> > not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is better. Should the
> > default value of
On May 7, 11:25 am, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 7, 11:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should
> > > n
On May 7, 11:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should
> > not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is better. Should the
> > defa
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:12 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? I think \[ and \] are ugly and hard to type compared to $$'s. What
> makes them so much better?
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~hildebr/tex/course/intro1.html
The main advantage of the bracket pair "\[", "\]" over the
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should
> not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is better. Should the
> default value of 'sep' be changed?)
Why? I think \[ and \] are ugly and hard
