On May 7, 11:25 am, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 7, 11:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >  (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should
> > >  not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is  better.  Should the
> > >  default value of 'sep' be changed?)
>
> > Why?  I think \[ and \] are ugly and hard to type compared to $$'s.  What
> > makes them so much better?
>
> >  -- William
>
> In the newsgroup comp.text.tex, people like Heiko Oberdiek (who I
> believe is a LaTeX expert) often says things like this, when people
> post sample code using $$ $$:
>
>   No, no, no, use never $$ in LaTeX.
>   (Spacing is wrong, fleqn is not working, ...)
>
> I haven't successfully been able to search for '$$ $$' in that
> newsgroup to find definitive descriptions of what's wrong.  Also, for
> what 'view' does, perhaps the difference between '$$ $$' and '\[ \]'
> doesn't really matter.  I may try to find out exactly what the problem
> with '$$ $$' is, and get back to you.

There's a thread now going in comp.text.tex called "what's wrong with $
$ in LaTeX" which has some (somewhat cryptic) replies.  I'll try to
post a link to it on Google groups:

<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/browse_frm/
thread/9488e9105a61c2c8#">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/
browse_frm/thread/9488e9105a61c2c8#</a>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to