[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Albrecht
> After looking at the size of boost, it doesn't look like rewriting the > C++/python wrapper of PolyBoRi would be necessary. I think it is also > worth the trouble of including the boost-python interface, since it > provides a very elegant and easy method of interfacing C++ [1]. I tried > googlin

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-17 Thread Michael Brickenstein
Hi! > Can you elaborate when and how much of boost is needed for the build? I - the pointer libraries (shared_ptr, weak_ptr, intrusive_ptr, scoped_array...) - iterator support from boost - preprocessor metaprogramming - of course boost::python > would also be curious about a tentative release da

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-17 Thread Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi! > Hello Michael, > I just want to mention, that the size of the compiled PolyBoRi > libraries is dependend on build settings. > On our 64-BIT compute server, it is less than 6 MB. > Can you elaborate when and how much of boost is needed for the build? I would al

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi! I just want to mention, that the size of the compiled PolyBoRi libraries is dependend on build settings. On our 64-BIT compute server, it is less than 6 MB. To the arithmetic: we can solve the famous pigeon hole problem series in a time comparable to minisat (sat-solver) just by multiplying

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-16 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hello, On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:12:02 +0200 Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William Stein wrote: > > > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be > > > fine with including > > > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional > > > packages (I can't r

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-14 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Michael Abshoff wrote: > William Stein wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine > > with including > > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages > > (I can't remember > > for sure though

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-13 Thread Michael Abshoff
William Stein wrote: > Hello, > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine > with including > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages > (I can't remember > for sure though). It's just a little python program, after all. > > It would take a

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-13 Thread William Stein
On 8/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 13, 6:43 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 13 August 2007 11:57, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > >http://www.scons.org/ > > > > > as build system and Boost > > > > > http://www.boost.org/ > > > > While Scons is ra

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-13 Thread mabshoff
On Aug 13, 6:43 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 13 August 2007 11:57, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > > > > Hi [sage-devel], Burcin & PolyBori authors, > > > thanks to Burcin Erocal -- a PhD student from Linz, Austria -- first steps > > are made to integrate the PolyBori f

[sage-devel] Re: build dependencies

2007-08-13 Thread Joel B. Mohler
On Monday 13 August 2007 11:57, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Hi [sage-devel], Burcin & PolyBori authors, > > thanks to Burcin Erocal -- a PhD student from Linz, Austria -- first steps > are made to integrate the PolyBori framework into SAGE. PolyBori is a > framework for computing in the Boolean Ring