> After looking at the size of boost, it doesn't look like rewriting the > C++/python wrapper of PolyBoRi would be necessary. I think it is also > worth the trouble of including the boost-python interface, since it > provides a very elegant and easy method of interfacing C++ [1]. I tried > googling for ways of using cython with C++ and the code that came up > was not very pleasant.
I think we will still have to use Cython here. The reason is that we want BooleanPolynomial and BooleanRing to fit into SAGE's inheritance tree. Can we -- without going through Python -- inherit from SageObject which is written in Cython using Boost? I think in our scenario PolyBoRi would be wrapped twice: a) an interface to make the current highlevel code of PolyBori work (either replicated via Cython or by using Boost) b) an interface which plays nice in the context of SAGE. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
