I'm in my office now and it works fine. Seems like the flaky wifi at home
is to blame. Sorry for the false alert.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, vi
On 1/21/12 11:58 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
I still see occasionally missing output.
Does it seem to be the same problem (i.e., the event isn't getting sent
to the server)? Do you happen to have a message log?
One thing to note: the control value of a slider being sent to the
server is the *i
I still see occasionally missing output.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www
On 1/20/12 6:11 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
This happens pretty reliably. Here is what I did:
I think we may have fixed this by upgrading jqueryui. I pushed the
change to aleph.sagemath.org. Can you check it?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups
On 1/20/12 6:11 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
This happens pretty reliably. Here is what I did:
I think this might happen because I upgraded jquery and didn't upgrade
jqueryui. I've submitted a pull request here:
https://github.com/sagemath/singlecell/pull/229
I'm hoping that Alex or someone ca
On 1/20/12 6:11 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
This happens pretty reliably. Here is what I did:
Thanks. I've reproduced this, and am looking at it.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...
This happens pretty reliably. Here is what I did:
1) execute
@interact
def f(n=(1..10)):
print n*n
2) Move slider to n=6
3) Output updates to 36
4) Move slider to n=3
Output stayed at 36
The log doesn't show the "SEND" for n=3 but the slider is definitely at
n=3. Also, waiting for a long
On 1/20/12 11:47 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
Thanks, that fixes the update speed issue!
Great!
But I have another problem with interacts, sometimes the output is not
updated as I release the slider in the above example. In fact, I do see
the same in the Android app and in the web client (Chrome
Thanks, that fixes the update speed issue!
But I have another problem with interacts, sometimes the output is not
updated as I release the slider in the above example. In fact, I do see the
same in the Android app and in the web client (Chrome 16 as well as
Firefox 9 on Linux), so I'm fairly c
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 at 03:20AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> I've fixed it now, and decreased the normal polling interval to
> 250ms (from 400ms) to match sagenb. Can you try it again?
Seems speedier to me. Less than a second to update after releasing the
button.
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
- http
On 1/18/12 10:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
My Java client for the single cell server that is at the core of the Android
app pretty consistently gets a reply in about 1s. And I have ping times of
about 150ms. Here is the log for a sample sessio
I don't see anything special with interacts in the Java client. It takes a
little bit over 1s to get the interact prepare, and getting the update
after changing the value (here to n=7) again takes about 1s. But when I use
the web interface the interacts feel slower (I'd say about 3s to update
a
On 1/18/12 10:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
So I'm reporting a bug
which is that interacts are slow.
Tracked here:
https://github.com/jasongrout/simple-python-db-compute/issues/227
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> My Java client for the single cell server that is at the core of the Android
> app pretty consistently gets a reply in about 1s. And I have ping times of
> about 150ms. Here is the log for a sample session for "1+1":
Very interesting! So the
My Java client for the single cell server that is at the core of the
Android app pretty consistently gets a reply in about 1s. And I have ping
times of about 150ms. Here is the log for a sample session for "1+1":
<< (32ms) Request to execute
>> (871ms) Python output
SageOutput
{
"content":{
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 at 06:42PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> I just did a little test of http://aleph.sagemath.org. I made this
> interact in aleph and also in sagenb.org:
>
> @interact
> def f(n=(1..10)):
> print n*n
>
>
> With aleph, I can easily count to 4 from when I let go of the slide
On 1/18/12 9:55 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Steinwrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus
wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus
>>> wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On W
FYI, just converted all my WebWork problems that call the single-cell
and all is well. Response times appear to be very good except for an
occasional hiccup (which could be anything.)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an e
On 1/18/12 8:42 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
They seem about equally fast to me, both around a count of 1. Connecting
from Singapore.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> In the recent thr
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
Willia
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
>>> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
>>> William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get
Thanks, works!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
>> William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do
>> do anything but throw HTTP-500 internal server erro
On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80,
William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get it do
do anything but throw HTTP-500 internal server errors. Since I am once
again at an institution that blocks ports !=
27 matches
Mail list logo
