On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 at 06:42PM -0800, William Stein wrote: > I just did a little test of http://aleph.sagemath.org. I made this > interact in aleph and also in sagenb.org: > > @interact > def f(n=(1..10)): > print n*n > > > With aleph, I can easily count to 4 from when I let go of the slider > until the number updates. With sagenb.org, I can't even count to 1. > I.e., sagenb.org is *dramatically* faster at interacts than > aleph.sagenb.org, at least in this one test. I've never though of > interacts on sagenb.org as "fast" before.
I'm seeing the same thing. The singlecell server is almost always slower, and has a high variance -- it's fast-ish sometimes, and sometimes really really slow. After a little while it just stops working. Connecting from Korea; about 135 ms ping time to sage.math, with huge bandwidth; I just averaged 4.96 MB/s downloading a source tarball. Dan -- --- Dan Drake ----- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake -------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
