On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
...
>
> The word "SageMath" does not have any entries at all in the trademark
> database.
>
> The point of this email is to discuss:
>
> (1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious "yes")?
+1
>
> (2) Should we also tra
Disclaimer: IANAL, but I do read Slashdot an awful lot. (that is,
take this with a larger-than-average lump of salt)
> If there were a problem trademarking the name Sage, it would I guess
> be most likely to be because of the accounting software.
>
> The word "SageMath" does not have any entrie
On Oct 16, 2009, at 5:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
> The point of this email is to discuss:
>
> (1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious "yes")?
>
> (2) Should we also trademark Sage in the context of math software,
> if possible?
>
> (3) Is there somebody who like "legal stuff" who
William Stein wrote:
> The point of this email is to discuss:
>
>(1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious "yes")?
I'm not sure it is obvious. Remember too it is only in the USA - to do it in
every country would probably cost a whole lot more.
>(2) Should we also trademark Sage
Hi Martin!
On Oct 16, 2:02 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > The point of this email is to discuss:
>
> > (1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious "yes")?
>
> Sorry for being so ignorant, but why is the answer obviously 'yes'?
IANAL, but I could imagine that in some countries it would b
> The point of this email is to discuss:
>
>(1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious "yes")?
Sorry for being so ignorant, but why is the answer obviously 'yes'?
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C
