Hi,
my prehistoric PPC PowerBook Mac OS X 10.4 successfully finished
building 3.1.3alpha2 and ran make testlong.
The testsuite didn't show surprises, apart from the known failures
only the usual timeouts and sporadic maxima crashes. There is a nice
new one for /elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py, w
On Oct 1, 8:29 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> Slightly different failures for sage -testall than others have reported:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/magma.py
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/rin
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:28 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha2 is out. It took a little longer and we ended up fixing some
> hard to track down bugs while waiting to merge some more spkgs. The
> highlight is likely the pynac.spkg - note that the actual library
> i
On Oct 1, 4:06 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2:30 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> > > Mike: Any idea what is going on here?
>
> > I think it's a missing line
>
> > sag
On Oct 1, 2:30 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> > Mike: Any idea what is going on here?
>
> I think it's a missing line
>
> sage: from sage.calculus.calculus import is_SymbolicExpression
>
> in calculu
On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 12:20 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
> > --
> > The following tests failed:
>
>
On Oct 1, 12:20 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
Hi Jaap,
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
> sage -t devel/s
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha2 is out. It took a little longer and we ended up fixing some
> hard to track down bugs while waiting to merge some more spkgs. The
> highlight is likely the pynac.spkg - note that the actual library
> integration code is not merged yet, but will be in 3.1.
On Oct 1, 8:35 am, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Georg,
> builds fine on Intel Mac OS X 10.4, this is what I get for make
> testlong:
>
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t -long devel/
On Oct 1, 10:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sagemath.org, cremona fails to build:
>
> 1.3.alpha2/local/include twoadic.cc -o twoadic_n.o
> g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include
> -DNTL_ALL -I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local
Hi,
On sagemath.org, cremona fails to build:
1.3.alpha2/local/include twoadic.cc -o twoadic_n.o
g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include
-DNTL_ALL -I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local/include
-I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local/include descent.cc -o
d
Hi,
builds fine on Intel Mac OS X 10.4, this is what I get for make
testlong:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py
Successful build and only one doctest failure, calculus/all.py
deprecation warning, on here:
proc/version:
Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.27-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2
20070115 (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:07:19 UTC 2008
/proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 1
vendor_id : Genui
On Oct 1, 4:39 am, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I only had the same failures as Alex Ghitza, on an intel mac (10.5).
>
> M. Hampton
Ok, I cannot reproduce the problem with
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
**
F
I only had the same failures as Alex Ghitza, on an intel mac (10.5).
M. Hampton
On Oct 1, 3:54 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two more things:
>
> a) the latest eclib.spkg is broken when we use 'export MAKE="make -
> j4"' - see #4228
>
> The issue here is a change to use ${MAKE} in th
Two more things:
a) the latest eclib.spkg is broken when we use 'export MAKE="make -
j4"' - see #4228
The issue here is a change to use ${MAKE} in the makefile instead of a
hard coded make. The way we uses to invoke parallel make has really
bothered me and I would suggest that we introduce
$S
On Sep 30, 9:53 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2008, at 21:08 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Please test and report issues as usual.
>
> > This probably is not specific to this build. I just used Software
> > Update on my Intel Mac to install "Java for Mac OS
On Sep 30, 10:47 pm, "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Built fine on 32-bit dell laptop running ubuntu. There are however four
> doctest failures:
>
> interfaces/magma.py
> calculus/all.py
> rings/number_field/order.py
> rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
>
> I've put a log wi
Built fine on 32-bit dell laptop running ubuntu. There are however four
doctest failures:
interfaces/magma.py
calculus/all.py
rings/number_field/order.py
rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
I've put a log with these up at
http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/sage/failures
The calculus
On Sep 30, 2008, at 21:08 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Please test and report issues as usual.
>
> This probably is not specific to this build. I just used Software
> Update on my Intel Mac to install "Java for Mac OS X 10.5 update 2,
> version 1.0". When I try to make 3.1.3.alpha2, in particul
> Please test and report issues as usual.
This probably is not specific to this build. I just used Software
Update on my Intel Mac to install "Java for Mac OS X 10.5 update 2,
version 1.0". When I try to make 3.1.3.alpha2, in particular
r-2.6.1.p20.spkg, it hangs on "checking whether Java compile
21 matches
Mail list logo
