On Dec 8, 2007 5:37 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sage-Developers,
>
> Because of slashdot, many people downloaded Sage today. Counting
> distinct ip addresses
> once (per download type) the number of distinct downloads via htttp
> from my three (of the 8)
> mirrors was:
>
> L
Hi Sage-Developers,
Because of slashdot, many people downloaded Sage today. Counting
distinct ip addresses
once (per download type) the number of distinct downloads via htttp
from my three (of the 8)
mirrors was:
Linux Binary
294
OS X Binary
290
Source
144
VMware (Windows)
600
Total 1328
I read slashdot a lot, but I only read +5 moderated comments - you can
set the filter to do that. If you read _all_ the comments, you'll
feel ill. There is an exponential drop in intelligence with each
point I think, at least after the mod points have stabilized.
Anyway, its true, by Slashdot s
On Dec 8, 2007 11:56 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 8:54 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was making that statement relative to the general level of
> > intelligence of slashdot comments.
> >
> > Josh
> >
Well, after reading the comment THOROUGHLY (I'm not sure why I've done
that), I agree. I must say that I wasn't aware of the fact that THIS is the
general level of intelligence of slashdot comments, although I occasionally
skim through the news.
Anyway, it surely IS publicity :)
Best wishes, Fabio
On Dec 8, 8:54 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was making that statement relative to the general level of
> intelligence of slashdot comments.
>
> Josh
>
Yep, compared to the other threads the comments seemed outright
intelligent
I was making that statement relative to the general level of
intelligence of slashdot comments.
Josh
On Dec 8, 11:51 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/12/2007, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > but the comments
On 08/12/2007, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> but the comments are pretty good.
>
Do you think so? I was struck by how silly and/or uninformed a lot of
them were, and ended up stopping reading them, while thinking that
"any publicity is good publicity".
I think this underlines how
but the comments are pretty good.
On Dec 8, 11:12 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The articles summary is pretty absurd.
>
>Josh
>
> On Dec 8, 10:40 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:41 AM, William St
The articles summary is pretty absurd.
Josh
On Dec 8, 10:40 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > On Dec 8, 2007 7:39 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Dec 8, 2007 4:13 P
On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007 7:39 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2007 4:13 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/08/1350258 wow! :)
>>
>> Ah, that's why http://sagemath.
On Dec 8, 2007 7:39 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007 4:13 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/08/1350258 wow! :)
>
> Ah, that's why http://sagemath.org/ is down. :)
>
> Ondrej
>
Yep, the apache server c
On Dec 8, 2007 4:13 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/08/1350258 wow! :)
Ah, that's why http://sagemath.org/ is down. :)
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@go
13 matches
Mail list logo
