On 08/12/2007, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but the comments are pretty good. >
Do you think so? I was struck by how silly and/or uninformed a lot of them were, and ended up stopping reading them, while thinking that "any publicity is good publicity". I think this underlines how important it is for people visiting the home page to get a good impression, and an accurate summary of what Sage is, within seconds. It will be very interesting to see how the downlad rate increases as a result, and traffic on sage-support, and bug-reports, and so on. John > On Dec 8, 11:12 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The articles summary is pretty absurd. > > > > Josh > > > > On Dec 8, 10:40 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:41 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 7:39 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Dec 8, 2007 4:13 PM, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>>http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/08/1350258wow!:) > > > > > >> Ah, that's whyhttp://sagemath.org/isdown. :) > > > > > >> Ondrej > > > > > > Yep, the apache server crashed due to slashdotting. Fortunately the > > > > computer itself > > > > didn't crash so I just restarted the server. > > > > > With slashdot, you might have to put it in a looping restart script > > > like trac is :) > > > -- John Cremona --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
