I read slashdot a lot, but I only read +5 moderated comments - you can set the filter to do that. If you read _all_ the comments, you'll feel ill. There is an exponential drop in intelligence with each point I think, at least after the mod points have stabilized.
Anyway, its true, by Slashdot standards this was excellent coverage. -MH On Dec 8, 2:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 11:56 AM, mabshoff > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 8:54 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was making that statement relative to the general level of > > > intelligence of slashdot comments. > > > > Josh > > > Yep, compared to the other threads the comments seemed outright > > intelligent. But I understand how John would get that impression :) > > Clearly John doesn't read slashdot much. The comments are extremely > intelligent > compared to the norm on slashdot. Plus Mike Hansen made a bunch of > very intelligent > comments. > > And of course most of the people commented have never tried out Sage, since > they > all slashdotted the download servers... > > -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
