I would like to emphasize the importance of integrating R. I have
given a few sage demonstrations lately, and I think I would have won
over a lot more people if it was included. Since I don't use it
myself, I have not volunteered for it, but I am happy to play a
supporting role testing, etc. It
> That sounds very good.
> But what would be the advantage of using RPy instead of your pexpect module?
It'd be faster since it integrates with the R library directly.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
T
That sounds very good.
But what would be the advantage of using RPy instead of your pexpect module?
Greetings, Fabio.
On 10/31/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > What is your opinion?
> > Can anyone unravel details about how this will be implemented? RPy
> maybe?
> I am almost fin
> What is your opinion?
> Can anyone unravel details about how this will be implemented? RPy maybe?
I am almost finished with a pexpect interface so that you can use R
just like any of the other programs that Sage has interfaces for
(Maple, Mathematica, Magma, etc.). I also have an experimental s
I mostly agree with the things stated above, and sage.calculus is clearly an
important part for applications.
Still, we should also consider other possible uses. I recently talked to
Michael Abshoff about whether we are planning to make R a part of SAGE. He
told me that William was convinced that i
> > So this is it:
> > Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> > be used for natural sciences/engineering applications etc.?
> > I think that first of all this would mean more users coming to sage.
>
> From my perspective, SAGE has evolved to the point where
Fabio wrote:
> So this is it:
> Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> be used for natural sciences/engineering applications etc.?
> I think that first of all this would mean more users coming to sage.
>From my perspective, SAGE has evolved to the point wh
On 10/28/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just copy and pasting something which I spoke about with cwitty and
> Martin Albrecht.
>
> So this is it:
> Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> be used for natural sciences/engineering applications
