That sounds very good. But what would be the advantage of using RPy instead of your pexpect module?
Greetings, Fabio. On 10/31/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What is your opinion? > > Can anyone unravel details about how this will be implemented? RPy > maybe? > I am almost finished with a pexpect interface so that you can use R > just like any of the other programs that Sage has interfaces for > (Maple, Mathematica, Magma, etc.). I also have an experimental spkg > for rpy, but there will need a bit of work done so that it can > interface cleanly with the Sage data types. > > --Mike > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
