Ivan Andrus writes:
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> So, summarizing, I have no strong feelings in the spke vs easy_install
> thing, but if having it as an optional spkg makes someone's
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
> So, summarizing, I have no strong feelings in the spke vs easy_install thing,
> but if having it as an optional spkg makes someone's life easier, my vote is
> just go for it.
>
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:29:06 AM UTC-4, jason wrote:
>
> On 6/26/12 8:23 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > BS3 is same license as Python, BS4 is MIT so I didn't want to have to
> > pretend to be a lawyer
>
> On this reason: MIT license [1] is perfectly fine for inclusion in Sage.
>
>
Ok, great. We
On 6/26/12 8:23 AM, kcrisman wrote:
BS3 is same license as Python, BS4 is MIT so I didn't want to have to
pretend to be a lawyer
On this reason: MIT license [1] is perfectly fine for inclusion in Sage.
Thanks,
Jason
[1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php,
http://www.gnu.org/
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> I am all for having data-scrapping tools easily available, but is there
> any actual advantage on having an spkg rahter than using easy_install, or
> is it just for the convenience of the sws2rst conversion?
>
> That being
I am all for having data-scrapping tools easily available, but is there any
actual advantage on having an spkg rahter than using easy_install, or is it
just for the convenience of the sws2rst conversion?
That being said, why make the spkg with BS3 rather than BS4? I believe BS4
breaks some back
On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:51:19 PM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:32:55 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> I don't remember if we need votes for optional spkgs. I think we do.
>> Anyway, here is one.
>>
>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637. Pablo
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:32:55 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote:
>
> I don't remember if we need votes for optional spkgs. I think we do.
> Anyway, here is one.
>
> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637. Pablo Angulo has
> some great work here making a wide variety of Sage workshee
