On Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:32:55 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote: > > I don't remember if we need votes for optional spkgs. I think we do. > Anyway, here is one. > > See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637. Pablo Angulo has > some great work here making a wide variety of Sage worksheets turn out to > good .rst files. I've done some relatively minor documentation and corner > case fixes in the script. > > Now, he uses BeautifulSoup 3 as an HTML scraper, and although this could > be installed by the user in other ways like easy_install, it's probably > best just to have an optional spkg waiting for use. The script already > fails with a good message (I've updated it somewhat) in case BS is not > installed, so we just need to be allowed to put this in the optional spot > so that > > sage -i beautifulsoup > > works. Please vote, if we need to (?): > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No >
Well, that was a rousing chorus. Given that this is a pretty normal Python package available via pip and easy_install, I'll take the silence as saying "optional is ok". Please comment at #10637 if you disagree. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
