On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:51:19 PM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:32:55 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote: >> >> I don't remember if we need votes for optional spkgs. I think we do. >> Anyway, here is one. >> >> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637. Pablo Angulo has >> some great work here making a wide variety of Sage worksheets turn out to >> good .rst files. I've done some relatively minor documentation and corner >> case fixes in the script. >> >> Now, he uses BeautifulSoup 3 as an HTML scraper, and although this could >> be installed by the user in other ways like easy_install, it's probably >> best just to have an optional spkg waiting for use. The script already >> fails with a good message (I've updated it somewhat) in case BS is not >> installed, so we just need to be allowed to put this in the optional spot >> so that >> >> sage -i beautifulsoup >> >> works. Please vote, if we need to (?): >> >> [ ] Yes >> [ ] No >> > > Well, that was a rousing chorus. > > > Given that this is a pretty normal Python package available via pip and > easy_install, I'll take the silence as saying "optional is ok". Please > comment at #10637 if you disagree. > Ok. Let's tip the Yes/No ratio towards Infinity ;) [x] Yes [ ] No
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
