On May 20, 12:11 am, Mickael Gastineau wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Mickael,
> After a check with the authors of the CeCILL-C license, they confirm
> that CeCILL-C is not immediately compatible with the GPL.
> But the CeCILL-C is compatible by transitivity with the GPL. The
> derived software from
Hi Michael,
After a check with the authors of the CeCILL-C license, they confirm
that CeCILL-C is not immediately compatible with the GPL.
But the CeCILL-C is compatible by transitivity with the GPL. The
derived software from the software under CeCILL-C can be released
under CeCILL (it's the comp
On May 13, 5:25 am, Mickael Gastineau wrote:
Hi Mickael,
> The fedora says that isn't compatible but the FSF says that it is
> compatible with GPL :
> seehttp://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ (section CeCILL version
> 2)
> orhttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
No,
The fedora says that isn't compatible but the FSF says that it is
compatible with GPL :
see http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ (section CeCILL version
2)
or http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
and the FAQ of the cecill says that the "CeCILL is nevertheless
compati
On May 13, 1:42 am, Mickael Gastineau wrote:
> Dear all,
Hi Mickael,
> You may have heard about the protocol called "Symbolic Computation
> Software Composability Protocol", abbreviated SCSCP, developped under
> the SCIEnce project (http://www.symbolic-computation.org/).
>
> I have made a C l
