On May 13, 5:25 am, Mickael Gastineau <amgastin...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Hi Mickael, > The fedora says that isn't compatible but the FSF says that it is > compatible with GPL : > seehttp://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ (section CeCILL version > 2) > orhttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses No, it is not. That entry is specifically about "CeCILL version 2". > and the FAQ of the cecill says that the "CeCILL is nevertheless > compatible with the GNU GPL: when a software under CeCILL is > integrated with a software under the GPL, the resulting work can be > distributed under the GNU GPL" > > So I consider that this license is compatible with the GPL license. Well, the FSF speaks specifically about the "CeCILL version 2". If you check the link I posted to the Fedora wiki you will see that they agree with that assessment, but neither "CECILL-C" nor "CECILL-B" are considered GPL compatible by the Fedora people. If you read the CECILL- C license I tend to agree that it is incompatible with the GPL. > Mickael, Cheers, Mcihael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
