>
> Once more, the rules make a point to enforce politeness but they seem
> to avoid things like having the respect to answer a honest question.
>
>
Collated for ease of reply, though there were also implicit questions and
examples of what was meant in the email.
- what is our commitment to
Hello guys,
Once more, the rules make a point to enforce politeness but they seem
to avoid things like having the respect to answer a honest question.
Could we thus have an answer to the ones aked by Therry ? Not ignoring
anybody is also part of elementary "friendliness".
Nathann
On 25 Novembe
> > > [Edited because this should be a family show]
>
> I was trying to be sarcastic and make visible a risk for machismo or
> androcracy that could follow from establishing some kind of competition
> within the community.
>
> I realize that the way i wrote those two lines somehow strengthen
> > [Edited because this should be a family show]
I was trying to be sarcastic and make visible a risk for machismo or
androcracy that could follow from establishing some kind of competition
within the community.
I realize that the way i wrote those two lines somehow strengthen such
theses. I am
Hi,
On 24/11/2014 15:06, kcrisman wrote:
> It seemed to me that this was an attempt to provide some slightly less
> arbitrary measure than "the BDFL and whoever he likes" or "the release
> manager and his friends". I am pretty sure that there were calls to
> perhaps find a different measure. Natur
>
> Trac tickets and comments, however, are public. Thus, among the many
> good questions raised by Thierry which deserve an answer, I am also
> interested by the answer to the following question:
>
> I consider myself as a Sage developer, i have never heard about this
> initiative before. Cou
Hello,
> Realistically, that is not how we operate. Somebody opens a ticket, works on
> it, and then posts the result for review. I have found quite a number of
> random failures on the buildbot (tagged by the random_fail keyword:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/query?keywords=~random_fail) and nobody
> For example:
>
> - what is our commitment to free software ?
> - should we collaborate (fund, advertise,...) with closed proprietary
> software ?
> - how do we take decisions (equality, transparency, collaboration, taking
> care of minorities,...) ?
> - are there some reserved territories wit
