[X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future
Mainly because I think everybody should use emacs as their operating
system. it will save their time and the money they spend on buying fancey
computers. Also Nicolas is very cool so I wanted to support his point ;)
That's said, I found c
I support the cause as well. Today, again I had to write the anoying
if unipoly p(arg) otherwise p([arg] + rest)
בתאריך יום חמישי, 10 במאי 2012 17:19:57 UTC-6, מאת Keshav Kini:
>
> darijgrinberg writes:
> > I am wondering whether this is intended behaviour or a bug. I imagine
> > it being a
I use fintely presented group in my code and for that I have to make lots
of call to gap. I'll try to replace them with your code and I'll see how
it'll work.
At first glance, I think it would have been a good idea, if you would have
started with permgroup.py and turned it into a free/finitepre
great.
>
> -Ivan
>
> [1] http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/sage_mode-0.8.spkg
>
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 4:27 PM, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I confirm I getting the same bug, in emacs 24, sage 5, getting
>
> Wrong type argument: hash-table-p, nil
>
> buffe
"sage-update-autoloads" also did not solve my problem, but with the hack of
Ezequiel
> ;;; hack to avoid error in python-send-command
> (add-hook 'sage-startup-before-prompt-
hook (lambda () (compilation-minor-mode 1)))
it works fine. It could be emacs 24 thing.
בתאריך יום שלישי, 24 באפ
I confirm I getting the same bug, in emacs 24, sage 5, getting
Wrong type argument: hash-table-p, nil
buffer *SAGE-main* is in commint-run mode. No inferior-sage-mode.
I have to run inferior-sage-mode, manually.
I have installed sage-mode-0.6 and sage-mode-0.7 directly from sage website
I also
In the following code:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: 2/(2*X)
2/(2*X)
Is there a case against simplifying 2/(2*X) to 1/X? If it is a bug, it
seems to me that we need a new set of "non_monic_gcd" functions for all
ring element classes that uses generic reduction (or is there a less
invasive solution?).
Okay it has nothing to do with function fields, is just that function field
passes the computation to fraction_field:
sage: k = FiniteField(nicePrime)
kA. = PolynomialRing(k)
ka = kA.fraction_field()
kaX. = PolynomialRing(ka)
kax = kaX.fraction_field()
sage: kax
Fraction Field of Univariate Polyn
I'm working on this but I thought maybe someone like William who wrote the
function field module knows the fix immidiately:
sage: k = FiniteField(13)
kA. = PolynomialRing(k)
ka = kA.fraction_field()
kx. = FunctionField(ka)
sage: ka(2)/ka(2)
1
sage: kx(2)/kx(2)
2/2
It makes some functions that c
ut this error on Lion".
> Any links to any posts/forums on this?
>
> I guess it is an ECL bug (or feature :)). I'll cc'in this to the ECL
> list, just in case they are aware of these issues.
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 1:26 pm, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
; link to it here?
> Thanks,
> Dmitrii
>
> On Mar 2, 5:03 pm, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I saw people talking about this error on Lion. But this machine is
> > linux, so it might be a new error.
> >
>
hich is not of the expected type (OR FILE-STREAM STRING PATHNAME).
I hope that helps in spotting the problem.
On Mar 2, 2:03 am, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I saw people talking about thiserroron Lion. But this machine is
> linux, so it might be a newerror.
Hi there,
I saw people talking about this error on Lion. But this machine is
linux, so it might be a new error.
uname - a
Linux msx0 2.6.18-274.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 8 21:37:35 EST 2011
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Error Log:
;;; OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=0, Speed=3, Debug=0
;;;
;;; E
It might be a trivial question but I merged two patch files that
uploaded previously but I couldn't delete the old files here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12170
Sorry if it's trivial question
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
It might be a trivial question but I merged two patch files that
uploaded previously but I couldn't delete the old files here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12170
Sorry if it's trivial question
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
e patch of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12170
On 23 ינואר, 02:32, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> In current version of sage you can not have a singular object for k(a)
> [x] when k is a non-prime finite field and a is transcendental. This
> is because singular does not supp
In current version of sage you can not have a singular object for k(a)
[x] when k is a non-prime finite field and a is transcendental. This
is because singular does not support defining such rings explicitly,
while if k was prime we had no problem.
I don't know what the developers of singular were
Hi Maarten,
I see this in Florian Hess's codes
###
# Genus
GffDifferentDeg := function(K)
local of, oi, df, di;
of := GffOrderMaxFinite(K);
oi := GffOrderMaxInfty(K);
df := GffOrderDisc(of);
di := GffOrderDisc(oi)
Thanks Julian,
Looking forward to compute with your codes
:)
On 20 דצמבר, 02:20, Julian Rüth wrote:
> I already have some code that does that for function fields. I just have
> not turned it into a sage patch yet. I'll CC you on the ticket for this.
>
> julian
>
> *
I think it is essential (speaking priority) to have a parallel to
Magam
"
RationalExtensionRepresentation(F) : FldFunG -> FldFun
The function field F represented as an extension of a rational
function field. This function gives the representation of function
fields F/k as finite extensions.
"
Th
, 12:34 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:57 PM, syd.lavas...@gmail.com
>
> wrote:
> > AFAIK, currently the function field object can not compute itsgenus
> > (see below). I'm thinking about adding this feature in following few
> > days. Now, the
AFAIK, currently the function field object can not compute its genus
(see below). I'm thinking about adding this feature in following few
days. Now, there are two different approaches I can take, and I would
like to know which one is more desirable for Sage community:
1. Sage can use singular to c
Hi there,
I was looking at solve_right. And as much as I understand if the
system has infinitely many solutions it just generates a random
solution (with free vars = 0). Doesn't it make more sense that it
gives back a matrix :
[C0 C1 C2 ..] such that X = C0 + C1*t1 + C2*t2 + ... be a solution to
t
Sorry, for the spam threat. I just wanted to target somebody on the
ticket team and I wasn't sure:
1) how sage-devel is effective for that
2) how responsive other members are.
3) If I'm boring people on the list with n'importe quoi.
But apparently it worked pretty well in all directions.
Best
Hi Maarten,
Thank you for the link. It was the thing I was looking for. I have
read Hess's paper on his algorithm for computing basis for Riemann-
Roch space . I'm pretty happy to start working on it , once I went
through your code and see what we have available at hand.
Also for my research I wa
sold to
Magma.
And thank you for telling me about IRC. I'll probably bug you pretty
soon there.
Cheers,
Syd
On 16 נובמבר, 09:04, Julian Rüth wrote:
> Hi Syd,
>
> * Jeroen Demeyer [2011-11-16 14:36:24 +0100]:> On
> 2011-11-16 09:12, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote:
> &g
Hi there,
I would like to know what's the status of the function field package
development in Sage, i.e. this ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9054
I would like to know when is the tentative date of the release (though
I think I can download the patch and install it myself) and
27 matches
Mail list logo
