[X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future Mainly because I think everybody should use emacs as their operating system. it will save their time and the money they spend on buying fancey computers. Also Nicolas is very cool so I wanted to support his point ;)
That's said, I found couple of bugs in it when I use it with emacs 24, for example you can only run sage-build from a window with inferior-sage-mode (subproblem of what we discussed before probably you need to add that hook thingi to the sage-build as well), also autocomplete and keyword?? take ages to work. It also hijacks python files no matter if there's a python interpretor open or not (I wrote a fix for this one). Though, it's unstable emacs 24. But if by the time it gets released, sage-mode is not standard, it's less probable that somebody cares about these bugs as Benjamin said. בתאריך יום רביעי, 30 במאי 2012 09:27:05 UTC-6, מאת David Kohel: > > [X ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future. > > Argument: Sage includes many interfaces to standard software. > This includes software that the majority users will never use in > their lifetimes, e.g. the big M's (unless at a mathematics > department or institute where there exists a license) and > numerous open source software libraries and systems. > Emacs is a standard open source tool, and an interface > (albeit from emacs to sage) seems reasonable. > I also thought that this was "standard" in the sense that > it was one file which one could find (like sagetex.sty) in > the sage distribution. I would like to find it there if I need > to update my system. > > --David > > On May 30, 7:44 am, Ivan Andrus <darthand...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 25, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > > > > Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users, > > > > > Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would > look at trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found > #2666 which wants to make sage-mode a standard package. > > > > > If people want this then I'd like to get it done. But if not then I'd > like to close the ticket. Personally, I'm not sure it should be standard > since people who wish to use it still have to add something to their > .emacs, and hence they still need to know about it and take some action. > However, I'm open to being persuaded. The spkg is 272K. > > > > > [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future. > > > [ ] Don't make it standard and close the ticket. > > > [ ] Don't make it standard now, but don't close the ticket. > > > > The results are fairly close (I guess everyone has responded who wants > to). We have 3.5 votes for making it standard, 3.5 for not, and 1 for > thought it was standard, which I assume means make it standard. So I guess > I'll keep the ticket open and work towards making it standard unless anyone > else would like to weigh in. > > > > -Ivan > > > > [X] Don't make it standard and close the ticket. > > Justin C. Walker > > David Roe > > Dima Pasechnik > > Benjamin Jones -- initially, see below > > > > [X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future. > > Nicolas M. Thiéry > > Keshav Kini > > Volker Braun > > Benjamin Jones -- if it would improve maintenance, see above > > > > [X] I thought it was already standard, and am surprised to hear that it > isn't. > > William Stein -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
