[sage-devel] Successful build on older MacBook Pro

2025-02-27 Thread Mike Wirth
Following Kwankyu's instructions to preface it with a PR on 39571, my build from source of Sage succeeded on my old MacBook Pro 9,2. Sage started up and executed simple tests with the following error *Possible bug wrt Safari* The 2d test plot opened a Safari window and displayed the generated png

Re: [sage-devel] Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

2025-02-26 Thread Mike Wirth
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:54 PM Mike Wirth wrote: > >> Hi all, > > > Responding to a suggestion to not pay attention to binary pkgs that > Homebrew failed to install, and pressing forward with the build, I did so. > Took a long(!) time on this wimpy MacBook Pro 9,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

2025-02-24 Thread Mike Wirth
Thanks, Kwankyu,, I'll take the incremental testing approach. As a first set of questions: - On the Install from Source Code page, the "macOS package installation" paragraph advises the installation of a long list of binary

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

2025-02-22 Thread Mike Wirth
Thank you, Volker, for that proof of viability of building Sage on Apple silicon (an M2 Mini) and to Kwankyu on both an M4 and Intel, all with macOS 15.3.1 (I assume). I would be happy to try again as suggested. But I expect I need to do some *cleaning of accumulated crud on my system* first to e

[sage-devel] Any interest in making building from source on Mac more robust?

2025-02-21 Thread Mike Wirth
Sage newbie. here, but long term Mac, etc., user and developer. Did serious early work with algebraic manipulation system, Macsyma, including doing internal mods in Lisp for 2D display of math expressions (pre-Latex). Especially interested in the manifolds package for tensor calculus. My primary