On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I was
> > reading the document you posted on the wiki about sd24, and I see the
> > roadmap is planning
g numpy arrays, I don't know if it may be faster.
Let me know if you want to improve it, we may have a fruitful discussion :)
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups
already in SAGE); I don't know how to hook in
a new window (from the browser) a SAGE console session which is
attached to the session of the notebook. Can anyone help with this?
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
;
>
>
> > 6. TRANSPOSE/CONJUGATE
> > If I want to get the transposed of a matrix, I have to write
> > "mat.transpose()", while on Matlab it's as easy as "mat' ". Same for
> > conjugating complex numbers or transposing+conjugating complex
&
May there be any "official" way to explain reciprocally and fix this?
I don't see any reason for not doing some effort in the direction of
cooperation, I don't think there's any problem among the user
communities
Maurizio
On Jul 23, 7:05 am, Jason Grout wrote:
&
numpy as another key component of SAGE, and I don't think
it can go anyway in science without supporting and being supported by
scipy/numpy: collaboration looks much more promising!
Maurizio
On Jul 22, 11:36 pm, Maurizio wrote:
> I have a quick question that is related to engineering suppor
s community, I'm wondering if they may
help, being even more experienced in contributing to SAGE.
Cheers
Maurizio
On Jul 14, 1:57 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> > I just spend a couple of words about IDEs. I've personally spent a
>
Unfortunately, I have no log of this. I think that what we did was to
make it run under the sage -sh shell, so that it was possible to do
"from sage import *" at the beginning of any python file and achieving
something pretty usable.
Sorry for missing details
Maurizio
On 18 Lug, 02:29
how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
which looks like html5 canvas
Maurizio
On 14 Lug, 10:03, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi
>
>
At the moment, there may be very little advantage of using SAGE
instead of plain python to interface with numpy/scipy, which are
anyway the core toolboxes needed.
Maurizio
>
> > I don't know what about outside Europe, but I find so strange that
> > SAGE is unknown in scientifi
roubles in working with scipy.optimize within SAGE, but I have
no details right now... I should better check!
My 2 cents
Thanks
Maurizio
On 11 Lug, 20:41, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:20 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > 1. IDE's
&g
e by non-mathematicians.
>
> Dave
I strongly agree on this! Even if there's nothing wrong with current
emphasis, I think that there's a lot of potential in non-mathematics,
but other sciences related users. For example, just having good
examples of the well working integration with n
ok, still me :P
I've found the relevant ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7501
now I'll try to apply the patch. it seems to me that this is actively
worked on, and there should be some draft code on someone else's
computer, so I am probably not any helpful here.
c
I am sorry,
yesterday I started to work on this, but I was working on sage 4.2
today I updated to sage 4.3.2, but I also noticed that in the
beginning of the file cell.py it is stated that it is part of the OLD
sage notebook...
now I should understand where to look again :)
maurizio
On 17 Feb
n the path recognized by the html page?
the good thing of codemirror, is that it is just a script to be
applied on a textarea within a div: doesn't that already match with
the current status of a cell?
thanks a lot
maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegro
d 0.6 version. the
important features should be back in 0.7 soon
My 2 cents
Regards
Maurizio
On 4 Feb, 06:52, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 09:33 PM, Alex Leone wrote:
>
> > Mozilla Bespin[1], which is an browser-based IDE with syntax
> > highlighting etc, recently releas
On 21 Gen, 00:22, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > even if in the recent times I've been much less involved with SAGE, I
> > just wanted to point out two pieces of software that I hope could
> > become us
ategorized snippets.
http://www.jonobacon.org/2010/01/12/acire-0-2-released/
By all
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this gro
I honestly didn't get the chance to work with it, but when I installed
sage-mode in emacs, I found it very useful, because it does this
integration of a powerful editor (also sufficiently newbie friendly)
with a sage embedded terminal
Try sage-mode and emacs!! :)
Maurizio
On 17 Nov, 17:31
Hi,
let me give a quick reference for starting with ppa:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/launchpad-ppa-tips/
regards
Maurizio
On Oct 24, 5:30 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
> Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive
I have not taken any offense, on the contrary!
Thank you very much for your detailed answer.
Maurizio
On Oct 27, 10:41 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > What about adopting a simpler strategy?
> > What do you think about this:
lems are solved.
Thanks for discussing this
Regards
Maurizio
On 27 Ott, 17:54, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I wonder
just some fine tuning. I hope
this amount of changes can be discussed openly, and that everybody can
help in this process.
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Ott, 20:37, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 26-Oct-09, at 11:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I wonder
Thank you Rob,
you seem to have caught my point 100%, I completely agree with your
comments
Maurizio
On Oct 26, 1:06 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> We have a Sage server on our campus. We don't have departmental
> sysadmins, instead it is maintained by the same folks who do the
>
ks correctly? Shouldn't it
come almost directly from checking the working upgrade of every single
current version?
Best regards
Maurizio
On 25 Ott, 15:48, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 2009, a
ease, rather than fearing
that something goes wrong because of a simple bug, and discovering it
just one day before the deadline (if not worse!).
I hope this will be useful to the community.
Best regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an
(or any other vastly widespread
distribution) to me is much less prone to problems, in the sense that
there is also much more support on Internet, because of the wide
adoption.
My 2 cents
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-d
tation for netlists. Maybe you could introduce the mechanical
equivalent of those :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Ott, 22:05, kstueve wrote:
> Have any of you heard of Erik Neumann? He published some excellent
> Java physics demos athttp://www.myphysicslab.com/ He is in Seatle,
> and has atte
tools out there, but maybe providing a service like this could
improve the translation process a lot.
Think about that
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
gards
Maurizio
On 17 Ott, 00:04, Dorian Raymer wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> We have merged a big development effort into the master
> repository<http://github.com/codenode/codenode>
> !
>
> This represents a milestone in the ongoing effort to bring the whole design
> to a new s
hat I wouldn't like to switch back to an old maxima,
so we should at least wait for them fixing it... maybe we can help on
that
regards
Maurizio
On 16 Ott, 22:55, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 16 říj, 22:44, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:> I am. I will
> write
Can't we take advantage of inheritance for this issue? I don't know
how far that can go, though, I'm not a programmer...
Thanks
Maurizio
On Sep 28, 9:40 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > First of all, thank you
>
After all, I'd be glad to see if any interest is shown in this
direction, since there is a reasonable amount of work around the
notebook now. Otherwise, thank you for the discussion :)
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
nts, I hope you can catch the usefulness
of this (if any) :P
Thanks, and regards
Maurizio
PS: feel free to ask me for many more insights, if I've not been clear
enough
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To u
Wouldn't be better if there was some sort of triangular end which
points to the exact thick (when they are plotted)? Without them, the
slider look a bit "approximate" or "inexact" :)
On Sep 18, 6:14 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> > I've attache
he word "solve"?
I don't know whether this is generally a good thing to do, but I just
keep finding it so easy if I do "solve[Tab]" so that ALL the functions
related to solving equations are shown (both exact and numerical)
cheers
maurizio
On Sep 17, 4:52 pm, Burcin
ation teams! For example:
the number of elements of the Italian translation team of Ubuntu is
just 16.
Otherwise, I think that the translation process can become VERY
frustrating
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On Sep 9, 9:50 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
> John
Why don't we close this ticket?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4566
There seems to be already a quite reasonable explanation to do this in
its comments
Maurizio
On 4 Set, 15:34, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Jason and anybody interested in symbolics in Sage,
>
> On Fri,
needed for the units package.
>
> E.g.,
>
> meter = var('meter', docstring="A meter is...", latex_name="m")
>
By the way, which is the status of the units package? Is the code
somewhere on the net? I'm quite curious! :)
Regards
Maurizio
>
&g
thanks guys :)
it was just an issue with missing environmental variables like
SAGE_ROOT I think, in the .emacs file.
now I hardcoded the directory where SAGE is, and I'm (slowly) going to
try sage-mode
thanks everybody!
maurizio
On 31 Ago, 10:51, Pierre wrote:
> maurizio, you should
ing to me (will I be able to look
at typeset output as well?)
Anyway, if that's so useful (as I hope) it looks reasonable to me to
make this more accessible to other people, or at least more
advertised! :)
Thanks and regards
Maurizio
On 30 Ago, 12:32, Pierre wrote:
> Maurizio, you shou
On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi!
> > I have a question.
> > Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
> > happen to work on this?
>
> > My desire wou
this useful, but if that doesn't
require too much work (as I hope), I think this could help a lot
people coming from MatLab.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 28 Ago, 00:38, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > The Sage not
hCAD,
since it supports units, and has proven pretty handful in the past.
I would like very much to have units supported in symbolic equations:
eq1 = x^2 + 2m * x + 1 m^2 = 0
solve(eq1) -> x = -1 m
:)
Regards
Maurizio
PS: that will result very useful, I appreciate that you accept
suggest
That's great! Congratulations!
maurizio
On 4 Ago, 18:09, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> > Can you pattern match on it? It's really irritating to do subs/
> > pattern matching on the existing derivatives.
&g
that is wonderful!!
by the way, I am looking forward to see those LTI and Fourier
Transform features applied to our powerful symbolic system :D
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 9:23 pm, Rafael Cardoso Dias Costa
wrote:
> The problem is solved!
>
> http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/677/
>
>
ch an appreciable initiative. I hope that it relies on well
spread standards like SPICE or SPECTRE netlist
Thanks for focusing on this as well :)
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 10:24 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> This seems interesting.
>
> I teach circuits and networks every semester as an application of
>
the
> above issue to keep working with fderivative of pynac?
>
> Or should we just restore old "diff" by simply sub-classing it
> from SFunction like what is being done for "integration"
> and others?
>
> Cheers,
> Golam
At the very end, my personal opi
everybody.
Regards
Maurizio
On Jul 18, 2:57 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Golam,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Golam Mortuza
>
> Hossain wrote:
>
>
>
> > I could implement above rather easily by exposing underlying Ginac
> > feature. However, I am not
I agree. We could do something like plotting all the deltas with a
stem plot and then superimposing the rest of the plot
Maurizio
On 24 Giu, 04:21, David Roe wrote:
> One way would be to have a vertical ray that doesn't change the scaling of
> the rest of the graph (just goes to the
As a clarification of what I was talking about, see this:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImpulsePair.html
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 23:45, Maurizio wrote:
> Many kudos for this!
>
> Honestly, I don't actually know whether it means that much, but at
> this point I think
uch of them,
but I'm sure there are many similar physical problems, that would take
advantage of plotting deltas.
Thanks again
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 19:02, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Thanks David, Tim, Burcin!
>
> Correct me if I have missed your points. With your suggestions
>
x27;s still pending, or it has been done, so that
some documentation to new design could be helpful, given that Dirac
delta implementation should rely on that.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 17 Giu, 13:56, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Golam,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:38:16 -0300
> Golam Mortu
ction, with the name
"solve_numerical" or something like that, so that when I do "sol[Tab]"
I get all the functions related to solving an equation, whatever the
domain.
Regards
Maurizio
On 15 Giu, 17:08, Jason Grout wrote:
> paramaniac wrote:
> > Dear Sage Developers,
files. Is there any guideline for Sphinx syntax?
If the current documentation is not there, which is the most updated
source?
Moreover, how are the available translations made public? I don't see
any advertisement.
Thanks
Regards
Maurizio
On 22 Mag, 09:10, Franco Saliola wrote:
> On Thu,
could help people to fall into
SAGE by looking for something else in google :)
I know this looks pretty useless, since nowadays everybody should
speak English, yet I know universities are still full of people not
necessarily fluent in English.
Regards
t we can start working on
building something on top of it. I am not even sure if something in
Pynac engine is not going under some rewriting or development. But I
think that 4.0 is coming soon!
I would be glad to hear your impressions and to be updated on your
work :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 2 Mag, 20:53,
rting points of the new CAS. I'm
sure you can give a lot of good (potentially constructive) advices,
and I'm sure people here are really willing to listen for them.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goo
he worksheet was not there anymore. By pressing "Discard
and quit", it was moved to the "Active" folder.
Is this desirable? I don't think so. I was actually very afraid I
could have lost it, but then I just found it in Active.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~--
gher
number of developers committed to symbolics (of course) rather than
SAGE. At the same time, I think that SAGE can make a big step forward,
once its community focuses on this task!
Thanks a lot
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
thank you for clarifying this, I didn't know that sympy was already
pretty well working with the new symbolics
I hope this has at least given some information to the community as
well! I always learn a lot from these discussions
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Apr, 22:58, Jason Grout wrote:
>
ittle slow
Regards
Maurizio
On Apr 21, 1:12 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 20, 1:12 pm, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Hi Burcin, thanks for replying!
>
>
>
> > I don't know what about those algorithms, but it seems to me that
> > SymPy already implements some goo
ntegrals; if those fail, then you bring out the big guns and apply
> > the decision procedure. If you're interested in working on
> > integration, maybe you'd rather work on the first phase? That
> > probably requires more computer science and less math than the second
to those, send patches
upstream, and move forward if needed.
Regards and many thanks
Maurizio
On Apr 20, 12:57 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM, root wrote:
>
> >> So we have a good start to implement the Risch algorithm in sympy already.
>
>
sounds more like a
Computer Science task, which is not really my field.
If I look at my first aim (Laplace and Fourier transforms...) I can
see a long way to cover, hopefully in the shortest time frame!
Regards
Maurizio
On 19 Apr, 17:10, Martin Musatov wrote:
> Aha! Quite the challenge is it n
Nice! :)
On 19 Apr, 16:42, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> In case there's interest... It's possible to embed any web page into an
> output cell with a bit of client-side mischief:
>
> http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/464/
>
> Since this uses cell_div_output_*, the embeds won't respond to requests
> to hid
problem? You can see that I'm not that
good in deep mathematical theory, but approaching the simplest problem
(that could be different from this one I'm looking at right now) is
fun :)
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send ema
Thanks for the answer.
As the time goes, I get more understanding of the complexity of the
problem (much more than I expected at first).
On 19 Apr, 02:27, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Maurizio wrote:
> > Could you be clearer? As I told, I'm not familiar
anything else?
Finally, I still would like to know which is the best way to translate
the output of a calculation with polynomial rings into a symbolic
expression, that can be carried on with maxima or pynac. Can you help
me?
Thank you very much
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~
t way I can think of is to use repr(), so that I can use solve
(), but hopefully there's a better way, at least to convert a
polynomials to a symbolic expression... Is there?
I know this is not leading anywhere... but thank you for your time! :)
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~--
quation solve" with no success. I am sure I could do
some DE solution in the past (something with maxima, something with
SymPy, I think, all through SAGE), but I think that I found the way to
do it pretty easily browsing the old reference manual...
Thanks a lot
Maurizio
PS: delta of dirac is a
change the standard behavior. So, would be
possible to keep a backup of the worksheet (when we open it), and then
start working on the original worksheet, and then restore the original
copy, if and only if the user decide to "discard" the changes? I know
this is not really the standard wa
Some time ago, I was annoying you guys for issues with transforms and
stuff like that.
On 20 Mar, 01:35, Maurizio wrote:
>
> So, up to now, my wishlist is:
> - better Laplace, Fourier, Zeta, any othertransformmanagement
> (especially in symbolic)
> - unit of measurem
On Mar 30, 5:36 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > I would really like to not have to annoy you with this stuff, but I
> > really think I'm missing something important (and useful!!)
>
> > The first thing I have to
ec[0])).subs(simpleDict)
vbSol = SR(repr(outVec[1])).subs(simpleDict)
I fear that I'm confusing SAGE by going back and forth with different
packages, so this is taking me hours to do simple operations (am I
wrong) like expand(), factor(), collect() and others (especially
expand, as you could se
hod for a pynac object).
Yes, the problem is that I found them quite slow, even though this
could arise from complex expressions. Unfortunately, I have not any
commercial software to compare with. Should I compare it with
evaluation time from working directly within maxima?
Maurizio
On Mar 30, 4:24 pm
One question: is there any plan to replace expand(), factor() and
other functions like these? I don't see them mentioned in the todo,
and I always find their usage so much time consuming...
Thanks
Maurizio
On Mar 29, 1:47 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put up a preliminary
this discussion useful for the
future.
Best regards
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 22:37, Maurizio wrote:
> People,
> I'm really glad about having brought this discussion to a reasonably
> interesting level.
>
> From now on, I can't give any other comment (I can't deal with c
o get those improvements I was
talking about in the previous posts
Regards
Maurizio
On 29 Mar, 15:38, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
> > Maurizio wrote:
> >> Let me throw this stone, it's just something that pops into my mind
> >> now: do you know what sim
nsidered as a possible enhancement. This would be really useful to
improve notebook usability.
At the very end, I'm afraid we would be implementing something like
Notepad++ (just an example) within the browser... Isn't there any
firefox plugin or stuff like that to directly provide this?
Than
#x27;t get the point of removing stuff for engineers,
how could this help them (I should say, us)? I think good examples and
documentation would be SO MUCH better to have!
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On 25 Mar, 16:09, rjf wrote:
> I think that you probably miss the point. Most engineers are not
>
share/contrib/
Thank you very much
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 16:16, Robert Dodier wrote:
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > As regards a Maxima package for z transform, I think Alasdair McAndrew
> > has written such a package about 2 years ago.
>
> More recently I've written some z-
ngle version.
I still encourage you guys to at least give your comments
Regards and thanks everybody
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 21:03, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> Maurizio
out there. I'm not saying we
should include REDUCE, also because I don't know whether maxima guys
at least made z transform available, but I think we should at least
consider taking some advantage from their open source code, especially
if we are now working so hard i
I agree... but what about magnitude and argument of the complex
number? I find this representation often more useful than real and
imaginary, so I think it's just a matter of the application.
+1 from me
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 22:28, Henryk Trappmann wrote:
> As I see there are no speci
I've opened a question on their launchpad project:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/python-quantities/+question/64894
I hope you guys share my feelings, so that I've been a good ambassador
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 19:28, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > I
ython-quantities-developers
Thanks
Maurizio
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Granato
Date: Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Subject: Quantities chance to spread
To: python-quantities-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
Hello guys,
I'm Maurizio, an electronic engineer w
But I think we need some effort to further develop
that... hopefully I'll push for that :)
Regards
Maurizio
Let me throw this stone, it's just something that pops into my mind
now: do you know what simulink is? That is a unique feature of MatLab
(actually it's a toolbox), which ha
just probably end up losing a good occasion, because things
are not ready yet (although I hope that's not the case)!
Regards
Maurizio
On 20 Mar, 01:01, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
>
http://www.sagenb.org/pub/285/
Even though this has just a minor percentage of the whole lot of
possibility there, I'm still quite happy about that, I really hope you
guys have a look at that.
I hope your patience stays always this high, as you can see, I'm not
giving up so easily ;)
M
nac???)
- NEW: labels in the notebook :) colors would be VERY nice as well!
I hope you don't ban me, but I can tell you I will come with many more
requests soon... I'm afraid to be to annoying, but I really enjoy this
stuff! Many thanks!
Regards
Maurizio
On 20 Mar, 00:20, Minh Nguyen wr
about all the other facts?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 23:48, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> > can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
> > compatible with SAGE? I don't know how S
age about that! What do you think?
I would prefer to keep that package, and simply try to apply some
short differential patch to it to get a SAGE compatible version, but
I'm not sure if I'll be able to.
Thank you for your time
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 19:29, Maurizio wrote:
> In fact my
Mar 19, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> > I know this is not being polite from me, but would you also consider
> > implementing folders in SAGE notebook?
>
> > I would really appreciate, since the number of my notebooks is growing
> > fast, and I'm wondering h
t know about it.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 22:05, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I implementing the feature in the notebook before where it lists all
> users when you click on "Share". I thought this was nice, since you
> could chose the ones you want. There are now
x2 = 39.76 inches
x2.unlock()
x2 = 1.01 m
PS: locking property could also be specified when instantiating an
object
2) changing the standard metric system (imperial / SI / any other) so
that by default each value is scaled as previously proposed
Any comment?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 16 Mar,
eters (or feets, or anything else)...
Regards
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 00:55, "fergusno...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for emailing me Nicolas.
>
> I had a quick play with writing a units extension really just to learn
> more about SAGE. I've only just started
and to ask them if they are willing
to work with us on making quantities compatible with one of our
symbolic packages? They seem pretty experienced about this package,
seem willing to improve their work, and this is (in my opinion) going
to be a VER
Thank you Jason, I'll try it as soon as possible.
By the way, have you got any idea about where in the code should I
look at to let it work with SAGE numbers? Something like constructors
or stuff like that?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 15 Mar, 02:29, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maurizio wrote:
&
theless I am wondering if the other opportunities
out there (there are at least three, as you can see in the trac
ticket) have been previously explored to take some advantage! There
are non-trivial issues like compound units management that may have
already been successfully faced.
Regards
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
