[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.2 does not works in macos Big Sur

On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 10:51:05 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote: > > > I have not noticed it before, but *sage-9.2-OSX_10.15.7-x86_64.app.dmg >> >> does >> not work *in macos 10.15.7. !! >> >> I do not understa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.2 does not works in macos Big Sur

> I have not noticed it before, but *sage-9.2-OSX_10.15.7-x86_64.app.dmg > > does > not work *in macos 10.15.7. !! > > I do not understand how a sage for macos 10.15.7 that does not works on > macos 10.15.7 has b

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.2 does not works in macos Big Sur

But, actually, it seems that macos Big Sur is not the problem. I have not noticed it before, but *sage-9.2-OSX_10.15.7-x86_64.app.dmg does not work *in macos 10.15.7. !! I do not understand how a sage for macos 10.

Re: [sage-devel] Missing package?

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, 19:23 parisse, wrote: > When compiling giac with nauty, I install nauty by hand and statically > linked, nothing more than libnauty.a is required. > In configure.ac, the check is done by > AC_CHECK_LIB(nauty,main) > AC_CHECK_HEADERS(nauty/naututil.h) > I can of course add anot

Re: [sage-devel] Missing package?

When compiling giac with nauty, I install nauty by hand and statically linked, nothing more than libnauty.a is required. In configure.ac, the check is done by AC_CHECK_LIB(nauty,main) AC_CHECK_HEADERS(nauty/naututil.h) I can of course add another check if it's required to compile with nauty, just

[sage-devel] Re: polynomial_modn_dense_ntl.pyx -- small_roots function -- minor change

Le mercredi 4 novembre 2020 10:00:41 UTC+1, Adam Larat a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > I hope I am posting at the correct place. > > There is a minor bug in the verbose output of the small_roots function in > Z/nZ[X]. > At line 567 (Sage 9.2, I might not be absolutely up to date…) of the > bu

Re: [sage-devel] Missing package?

Thx On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:32, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM brucew...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > This is off-topic but I don't know the right place to ask this question > about using git. > > > > I now have a detached HEAD at 9.3.beta0 > > > > I tried "git checkout

Re: [sage-devel] Missing package?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM brucew...@gmail.com wrote: > > This is off-topic but I don't know the right place to ask this question about > using git. > > I now have a detached HEAD at 9.3.beta0 > > I tried "git checkout master" and got some hints and then > fatal: 'master' matched multiple (2

Re: [sage-devel] Missing package?

This is off-topic but I don't know the right place to ask this question about using git. I now have a detached HEAD at 9.3.beta0 I tried "git checkout master" and got some hints and then fatal: 'master' matched multiple (2) remote tracking branches How do I get my develop branch back? On Wednes

[sage-devel] Re: missing docker images of sagemath

At https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemath/sagemath-dev/tags tags are still 4 months old. I notice that #30736 is in 9.3.beta0 but not #30820 yet. This should be fixed automatically if #30820 is in the next beta? On Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 8:25:46 PM UTC+1 Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > Could some p

[sage-devel] Segmentation Fault with Singular's Primdec_lib

I tried importing functions from Singular's primdec_lib to use them in comparison with sage's minimal_associated_primes(), but get a segfault every time I use them after I use minimal_associated_primes() from Sage. Can anyone explain why? Example: min_ass1=sage.libs.singular.function_factory.